Source: Figure created in the Mind the Graph Platform, available at www.mindthegraph.com
The high prevalence of cardiac diseases around the world has created a need for quick, easy and cost effective approaches to diagnose heart disease. The auscultation and interpretation of heart sounds using the stethoscope is relatively inexpensive, requires minimal to advanced training, and is widely available and easily carried by healthcare providers working in urban environments or medically underserved rural areas. Since René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laennec’s simple, monoaural design, the capabilities of modern-day, commercially available stethoscopes and stethoscope systems have radically advanced with the integration of electronic hardware and software tools, however these systems are largely confined to the metropolitan medical centers. The purpose of this paper is to review the history of stethoscopes, compare commercially available stethoscope products and analytical software, and discuss future directions. Our review includes a description of heart sounds and how modern software enables the measurement and analysis of time intervals, teaching auscultation, remote cardiac examination (telemedicine) and, more recently, spectrographic evaluation and electronic storage. The basic methodologies behind modern software algorithms and techniques for heart sound preprocessing, segmentation and classification are described to provide awareness.
RanganathanNSivaciyanVSaksenaFB. The art and science of cardiac physical examination with heart sounds, jugular and precordial pulsations on CD includes 12-lead ECG interpretation. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2016.
KalinauskienėERazvadauskasHMorseDJ, et al. A comparison of electronic and traditional stethoscopes in the heart auscultation of obese patients. Medicina2019; 55(4): 94.
18.
MilesRNCuiWSuQT, et al. A MEMS low-noise sound pressure gradient microphone with capacitive sensing. J Microelectromech Syst2015; 24(1): 241–248.
19.
SurtelWMaciejewskiMMaciejewskaB. Processing of simultaneous biomedical signal data in circulatory system conditions diagnosis using mobile sensors during patient activity. In: 2013 Signal processing: algorithms, architectures, arrangements, and applications (SPA), 2013, pp.163–167.
20.
LengSTanRSChaiKTC, et al. The electronic stethoscope. Biomed Eng Online2015; 14: 66.
21.
MakaryusANMakaryusJNFiggattA, et al. Utility of an advanced digital electronic stethoscope in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared with coronary computed tomographic angiography. Am J Cardiol2013; 111(6): 786–792.
22.
LiuYNortonJJSQaziR, et al. Epidermal mechano-acoustic sensing electronics for cardiovascular diagnostics and human-machine interfaces. Sci Adv2016; 2(11): e1601185.
23.
ZhangGLiuMGuoN, et al. Design of the MEMS piezoresistive electronic heart sound sensor. Sensors2016; 16(11): 1728.
24.
WintherSNissenLSchmidtSE, et al. Diagnostic performance of an acoustic-based system for coronary artery disease risk stratification. Heart2018; 104(11): 928–935.
25.
HuYXuY. An ultra-sensitive wearable accelerometer for continuous heart and lung sound monitoring. In: 2012 Annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, pp.694–697. New York, NY: IEEE.
26.
PintoCPereiraDFerreira-CoimbraJ, et al. A comparative study of electronic stethoscopes for cardiac auscultation. 2017 39th Annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)2017, pp.261–2613. New York: IEEE.
27.
LaiLSWRedingtonANReinischAJ, et al. Computerized automatic diagnosis of innocent and pathologic murmurs in pediatrics: A pilot study. Congenit Heart Dis2016; 11(5): 386–395.
28.
KoningCLockA. A systematic review and utilization study of digital stethoscopes for cardiopulmonary assessments. J Med Res Innov2021; 5(40): 4–14.
KangSHJoeBYoonY, et al. Cardiac auscultation using smartphones: Pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2018; 6(2): e49.
33.
HedgeVN. Random noise cancellation in biomedical signals using variable step size Griffth LMS adaptive line enhancer. J Mech Med Biol2012; 12(4): 599–618.
34.
WidrowBGloverJRMcCoolJM, et al. Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE1975; 63(12): 1692–1716.
35.
SunSJiangZWangH, et al. Automatic moment segmentation and peak detection analysis of heart sound pattern via short-time modified Hilbert transform. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2014; 114(3): 219–230.
36.
BasakKMandalSManjunathaM, et al. Phonocardiogram signal analysis using adaptive line enhancer methods on mixed signal processor. In: International conference on signal processing and communications2010, pp.1–5.
RenHJinHChenC, et al. A novel cardiac auscultation monitoring system based on wireless sensing for healthcare. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med2018; 6: 1–12.
39.
LiuCSpringerDLiQ, et al. An open access database for the evaluation of heart sound algorithms. Physiol Meas2016; 37(12): 2181–2213.
40.
LiangHLukkarinenSHartimoI. Heart sound segmentation algorithm based on heart sound envelogram. Comput Cardiol19971997; 105–108.
41.
HuiyingLSakariLIiroH. A heart sound segmentation algorithm using wavelet decomposition and reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. ‘Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering’ (Cat. No.97CH36136), 1997, vol. 4, pp.1630–1633. New York: IEEE.
42.
NaseriHHomaeinezhadMR. Detection and boundary identification of phonocardiogram sounds using an expert frequency-energy based metric. Ann Biomed Eng2013; 41(2): 279–292.
43.
VargheesVNRamachandranKI. A novel heart sound activity detection framework for automated heart sound analysis. Biomed Signal Process Control2014; 13: 174–188.
44.
NigamVPriemerR. Accessing heart dynamics to estimate durations of heart sounds. Physiol Meas2005; 26(6): 1005–1018.
OskiperTWatrousR. Detection of the first heart sound using a time-delay neural network. Comput Cardiol2002; 537–540.
47.
ChenTKuanKCeliL, et al. Intelligent heartsound diagnostics on a cellphone using a hands-free kit. In: AAAI Spring symposium on artificial intelligence for development, 2009, pp.26–31.
48.
GuptaCNPalaniappanRSwaminathanS, et al. Neural network classification of homomorphic segmented heart sounds. Appl Soft Comput2007; 7(1): 286–297.
49.
CappéOMoulinesERydenT. Inference in Hidden Markov models. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
50.
GameroLGWatrousR. Detection of the first and second heart sound using probabilistic models. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439), 2003; 3, pp.2877–2880. New York, NY: IEEE.
51.
GillDGavrieliNIntratorN. Detection and identification of heart sounds using homomorphic envelogram and self-organizing probabilistic model. Comput Cardiol2005; 2005: 957–960.
52.
SchmidtSEHolst-HansenCGraffC, et al. Segmentation of heart sound recordings by a duration-dependent hidden Markov model. Physiol Meas2010; 31(4): 513–529.
53.
AkayYMAkayMWelkowitzW, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag1994; 13(5): 761–764.
54.
BhatikarSRDeGroffCMahajanRL. A classifier based on the artificial neural network approach for cardiologic auscultation in pediatrics. Artif Intell Med2005; 33(3): 251–260.
AriSHembramKSahaG. Detection of cardiac abnormality from PCG signal using LMS based least square SVM classifier. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37(12): 8019–8026.
57.
WangPLimCSChauhanS, et al. Phonocardiographic signal analysis method using a modified hidden markov model. Ann Biomed Eng2007; 35(3): 367–374.
58.
Quiceno-ManriqueAFGodino-LlorenteJIBlanco-VelascoM, et al. Selection of dynamic features based on time–frequency representations for heart murmur detection from phonocardiographic signals. Ann Biomed Eng2010; 38(1): 118–137.
59.
AsmareMHFiltjensBWoldehannaF, et al. Rheumatic heart disease screening based on phonocardiogram. Sensors2021; 21(19): 6558.
60.
DahlLBHasvoldPArildE, et al. Heart murmurs recorded by a sensor based electronic stethoscope and e-mailed for remote assessment. Arch Dis Child2002; 87(4): 297–301.
61.
LvJDongBLeiH, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted auscultation in detecting congenital heart disease. Eur Soc Cardiol2021; 2: 119–124.
62.
PylesLHemmatiPPanJ, et al. Initial field test of a cloud-based cardiac auscultation system to determine murmur etiology in rural China. Pediatr Cardiol2017; 38(4): 656–662.
63.
KaimingHXiangyuZRenS, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1993.
64.
ChorbaJSShapiroAMLeL, et al. Deep learning algorithm for automated cardiac murmur detection via a digital stethoscope platform. J Am Heart Assoc2021; 10(9): e019905.
65.
PolikarR. Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits Syst Mag2006; 6(3): 21–45.
