Pressure ulcers are a frequent complication in patients having limited activity and mobility (e.g., elderly people, spinal cord injury patients, people with disabilities, etc.). The aim of this work is the conceptual design, modelling and control of a new seat cushion for pressure ulcers prevention. The whole system (constituted by the seat cushion equipped with a real-time pressure mapping with closed-loop control) is designed to identify the critical points on the human skin, before pressure ulcers creation, and to be able to distribute the contact pressure between the human and cushion avoiding wound creation. The seat cushion is constituted by soft air-cells actuated by air flow. To define the shape and size of the soft air-cells, finite element simulations are carried out, analysing the internal volume reduction with external loads application to reproduce the variable stiffness. The data obtained by finite element analysis are used to simulate inflation and deflation of the soft bubble air-cells. Finally, the control systems of a single air-cell and of the whole cushion are designed and simulated. The novelty of our work consists in the conception of a seat cushion able to recognise higher and lower risk zones of pressure ulcer generation on the human skin and to provide compensation automatically. This work can therefore be considered in line with the sustainable development goals recently launched by the EU Commission.
EdsbergLEBlackJMGoldbergM, et al. Revised National pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs2016; 43(6): 585–597.
2.
DefloorT.The risk of pressure sores: a conceptual scheme. J Clin Nurs1999;8(2):206–216.
3.
TubaishatAPapanikolaouPAnthonyD, et al. Pressure ulcers prevalence in the acute care setting: a systematic review, 2000-2015. Clin Nurs Res2018; 27(6): 643–659.
4.
CremascoMFWenzelFZaneiSS, et al. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk. J Clin Nurs2013; 22(15-16): 2183–2191.
5.
AndersJHeinemannALeffmannC, et al. Decubitus ulcers: pathophysiology and primary prevention. Dtsch Arztebl2010; 107(21): 371–382.
6.
ColemanSGoreckiCNelsonEA, et al. Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud2013; 50(7): 974–1003.
7.
StekelenburgAGawlittaDBaderDL, et al. Deep tissue injury: how deep is our understanding?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89(7): 1410–1413.
8.
ThompsonD.A critical review of the literature on pressure ulcer aetiology. J Wound Care2005; 14(2): 87–90.
9.
Tamez-DuqueJCobian-UgaldeRKilicarslanA, et al. Real-time strap pressure sensor system for powered exoskeletons. Sensors2015; 15(2): 4550–4563.
10.
MarchioneFGAraújoLMQAraújoLV.Approaches that use software to support the prevention of pressure ulcer: a systematic review. Int J Med Informatics2015; 84(10): 725–736.
11.
PetersonMJGravensteinNSchwabWK, et al. Patient repositioning and pressure ulcer risk-monitoring interface pressures of at-risk patients. J Rehabil Res Dev2013; 50(4): 477–488.
12.
StephensMBartleyCA.Understanding the association between pressure ulcers and sitting in adults what does it mean for me and my carers? Seating guidelines for people, carers and health & social care professionals. J Tissue Viability2018; 27(1): 59–73.
13.
TranJPMcLaughlinJMLiRT, et al. Prevention of pressure ulcers in the acute care setting: new innovations and technologies. Plast Reconstr Surg2016; 138(3): 232S–240S.
14.
TakahashiYNemotoTMizokamiF, et al. A new concept: ‘Relative position between the external force and the bony prominence’ explains location-specific occurrence of superficial injury over an undermining lesion. J Tissue Viability2017; 26(1): 75–78.
15.
Gil-AgudoADe laPeña-González ADel Ama-EspinosaA, et al. Comparative study of pressure distribution at the user-cushion interface with different cushions in a population with spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech2009; 24(7): 558–563.
16.
SonenblumSEVonkTEJanssenTW, et al. Effects of wheelchair cushions and pressure relief maneuvers on ischial interface pressure and blood flow in people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95(7): 1350–1357.
17.
WijesundaraMCarriganW.Fluid-driven bubble actuator arrays. Patent 10,064,744, USA, 2018.
18.
García-MolinaPCasasusSRSanchis-SánchezE, et al. Evaluation of interface pressure and temperature management in five wheelchair seat cushions and their effects on user satisfaction: evaluation of seat cushions to prevent pressure ulcer. J Tissue Viability2021; 30(3): 402–409.
19.
AwtvnfP.All wales best practice guidelines: seating and pressure ulcers. London: PMG,2019.
20.
ShiCDumvilleJCCullumN.Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention: a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE2018; 13(2): e0192707.
21.
BeeckmanDSerraesBAnrysC, et al. A multicentre prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and cost of a static air mattress and alternating air pressure mattress to prevent pressure ulcers in nursing home residents. Int J Nurs Stud2019; 97: 105–113.
22.
CarriganWNuthiPPandeC, et al. Design and operation verification of an automated pressure mapping and modulating seat cushion for pressure ulcer prevention. Med Eng Phys2019; 69: 17–27.
23.
WuGABogieKM.Effects of conventional and alternating cushion weight-shifting in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev2014; 51(8): 1265–1276.
24.
YuCChouTChenC, et al. Development of a modularized seating system to actively manage interface pressure. Sensors2014; 14(8): 14235–14252.
25.
FreetoTMitchellSJBogieKM.Preliminary development of an advanced modular pressure relief cushion: Testing and user evaluation. J Tissue Viability2018; 27(1): 2–9.
GeyerMJBrienzaDMKargP, et al. A randomized control trial to evaluate pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly wheelchair users. Adv Skin Wound Care2001; 14(3): 120–129; quiz 131–132.
29.
TavaresCDominguesMFPaixãoT, et al. Wheelchair pressure ulcer prevention using FBG based sensing devices. Sensors2020; 20(1): 212.
30.
AriasSCardielEGarayL, et al. (2013, July). A pressure distribution measurement system for supporting areas of wheelchair users. In: 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013, pp. 4751–4754. New York: IEEE.
31.
SonenblumSESprigleSHCathcartJM, et al. 3D anatomy and deformation of the seated buttocks. J Tissue Viability2015; 24(2): 51–61.
32.
BelforteG.Manuale di pneumatica. Tecniche Nuove, 2005, pp. 515–517.
33.
NajjariBBarakatiSMMohammadiA, et al. Modelling and controller design of electro-pneumatic actuator based on PWM. IAES Int J Rob Autom2012; 1(3): 125.
34.
TopçuEEYükselIKamişZ.Development of electro-pneumatic fast switching valve and investigation of its characteristics. Mechatronics2006; 16(6): 365–378.
35.
FerraresiCMaffiodoDFrancoW, et al. Hardware-in-the-loop equipment for the development of an automatic perturbator for clinical evaluation of human balance control. Appl Sci2020; 10(24): 1–17.
36.
HollingtonJHillmanSJTorres-SánchezC, et al. ISO 16840-2:2007 load deflection and hysteresis measurements for a sample of wheelchair seating cushions. Med Eng Phys2014; 36(4): 509–515.
37.
AissaouiRKauffmannCDansereauJ, et al. Analysis of pressure distribution at the body-seat interface in able-bodied and paraplegic subjects using a deformable active contour algorithm. Med Eng Phys2001; 23(6): 359–367.
38.
MuscoloGGFontanaM.A novel linear pneumatic actuator with tunable-compliance constraint. Int J Mech Control2020; 21(2): 73–86.
39.
CarriganWNuthiPPandeC, et al. A pressure modulating sensorized soft actuator array for pressure ulcer prevention. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Cleveland, OH, 2017, DETC2017-68191, p. 7. New York: ASME.
40.
MuscoloGGMorettiGCannataG.SUAS: a novel soft underwater artificial skin with capacitive transducers and hyperelastic membrane. Robotica2019; 37(4): 756–777.
41.
FranchiVCannellaFDi RitoG, et al. Modelling and control design of a novel robotic membrane. Int J Mech Control2019; 20(2): 113–122.
42.
BotteroSMuscoloGGFerraresiC.A new soft RCC device with pneumatic regulation. Robotics2020; 9(4): 1–12.
