This article proposes a bending angle controller for soft pneumatic actuators, which could be implemented in soft robotic rehabilitation gloves to assist patients with hand impairment, such as stroke survivors. A data-driven model is used to estimate the angle as pneumatic pressure is applied to the actuator. Furthermore, a finite element model was used to manually optimize the dimensions of the actuator. An embedded flex sensor, which together with a custom testing rig, was used to gather input data for the data-driven model. This rig contains a pneumatic pressure control circuit as well as a camera for image acquisition. Collected data were fed into a linear regression model to predict the data-driven model. Experiments were carried out to validate model’s accuracy as well as modified proportional–integral–derivative controller angle controller performance. The latter controller is designed to mitigate the non-linear response of solenoid valves at different pressures of the actuator. The data-driven model along with the used controller allows more accurate estimation and quicker response.
SasakiDNoritsuguTTakaiwaM, et al. Wearable power assist device for hand grasping using pneumatic artificial rubber muscle. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Kurashiki, Japan, 22 September 2004, pp. 655–660. New York: IEEE.
9.
DeimelRBrockO. A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Karlsruhe, 6–10 May 2013, pp. 2047–2053. New York: IEEE.
10.
GallowayKCPolygerinosPWalshCJ, et al. Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators. In: Proceedings of the 2013 16th international conference on advanced robotics (ICAR), Montevideo, 25–29 November 2013, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
11.
PolygerinosPGallowayKCSavageE, et al. Soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation and task specific training. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Seattle, WA, 26–30 May 2015, pp. 2913–2919. New York: IEEE.
12.
GuoSZhaoFWeiW, et al. Soft actuator for hand rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA’2015), Beijing, China, 2–5 August 2015, pp. 2197–2202. New York: IEEE.
13.
ConnollyFWalshCJBertoldiK. Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching. P Natl Acad Sci USA2017; 114: 51–56.
14.
SunYSongYSPaikJ. Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Tokyo, Japan, 3–7 November 2013, pp. 4446–4453. New York: IEEE.
15.
ElsayedYVincensiALekakouC, et al. Finite element analysis and design optimization of a pneumatically actuating silicone module for robotic surgery applications. Soft Robot2014; 1: 255–262.
16.
PolygerinosPWangZOverveldeJTB, et al. Modeling of soft fiber-reinforced bending actuators. IEEE T Robot2015; 31: 778–789.
17.
LekakouCMustazaSMCrispT, et al. A material-based model for the simulation and control of soft robot actuator. In: Proceedings of the annual conference towards autonomous robotic systems, Guildford, 19–21 July 2017, pp. 557–569. Cham: Springer.
18.
ElgeneidyKLohseNJacksonM. Bending angle prediction and control of soft pneumatic actuators with embedded flex sensors—a data-driven approach. Mechatronics2018; 50: 234–247.
19.
LaschiCCianchettiMMazzolaiB, et al. Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Adv Robotics2012; 26: 709–727.
20.
DrotmanDJadhavSKarimiM, et al. 3D printed soft actuators for a legged robot capable of navigating unstructured terrain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Singapore, 29 May–3 June 2017, pp. 5532–5538. New York: IEEE.
21.
ZhangHWangMYChenF, et al. Design and development of a soft gripper with topology optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24–28 September 2017, pp. 6239–6244. New York: IEEE.
22.
George ThuruthelTAnsariYFaloticoE, et al. Control strategies for soft robotic manipulators: a survey. Soft Robot2018; 5: 149–163.
23.
GerboniGDiodatoACiutiG, et al. Feedback control of soft robot actuators via commercial flex bend sensors. IEEE/ASME T Mech2017; 22: 1881–1888.
24.
ShinDSardellittiIParkYL, et al. Design and control of a bio-inspired human-friendly robot. Int J Robot Res2010; 29: 571–584.
25.
MarcheseADKomorowskiKOnalCD, et al. Design and control of a soft and continuously deformable 2D robotic manipulation system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Hong Kong, China, 31 May–7 June 2014, pp. 2189–2196. New York: IEEE.
26.
KaliskyTWangYShihB, et al. Differential pressure control of 3D printed soft fluidic actuators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24–28 September 2017, pp. 6207–6213. New York: IEEE.
27.
IbrahimSKrauseJCRaatzA. Linear and nonlinear low level control of a soft pneumatic actuator. In: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), Seoul, Korea, 14–18 April 2019, pp. 434–440. New York: IEEE.
28.
YapHKLimJHNasrallahF, et al. A soft exoskeleton for hand assistive and rehabilitation application using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Seattle, WA, 26–30 May 2015, pp. 4967–4972. New York: IEEE.
29.
WangZPolygerinosPOverveldeJTB, et al. Interaction forces of soft fiber reinforced bending actuators. IEEE/ASME T Mech2017; 22: 717–727.
30.
MosadeghBPolygerinosPKeplingerC, et al. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater2014; 24: 2163–2170.
WebsterRJJonesBA. Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: a review. Int J Robot Res2010; 29: 1661–1683.
33.
SadatiSMHNaghibiSEShivaA, et al. Mechanics of continuum manipulators, a comparative study of five methods with experiments. In: Proceedings of the annual conference towards autonomous robotic systems, Guildford, 19–21 July 2017, pp. 686–702. Cham: Springer.
34.
YoonJRyuJBurdeaG, et al. Control of the Rutgers ankle rehabilitation interface. In: Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New Orleans, LA, 17–22 November 2002, pp. 787–794. New York: ASME.
35.
VargaZKeski-HonkolaP. Determination of flow rate characteristics for pneumatic valves. EPJ Web Conf2012; 25: 01096.
