The wear of a model metal-on-metal ball-and-socket total disc arthroplasty was measured in a simulator. The ball had a radius of 10 mm, and there was a radial clearance between ball and socket of 0.015 mm. The model was subjected to simultaneous flexion–extension, lateral bending, axial rotation (frequency: 1 Hz) and compression (frequency: 2 Hz, maximum load: 2 kN). Throughout the tests, the models were immersed in calf serum diluted to a concentration of 15 g protein per litre, at a controlled temperature of 37 °C. Tests were performed on three models. At regular intervals (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 million cycles), mass and surface roughness were determined; mass measurements were converted into the volume lost as a result of wear. All measurements were repeated six times. Wear occurred in two stages. In the first stage (duration about 1 million cycles), there was a linear wear rate of 2.01 ± 0.04 mm3 per million cycles; in the second stage, there was a linear wear rate of 0.76 ± 0.02 mm3 per million cycles. Surface roughness increased linearly in the first million cycles and then continued to increase linearly but more slowly.
FrelinghuysenPHuangRCGirardiFP. Lumbar total disc replacement part 1: rationale, biomechanics and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am2005; 36: 293–299.
3.
HallRMBrownTDFisherJ. Introduction to lumbar total disc replacement: factors that affect tribological performance. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2006; 220: 775–786.
4.
LeeJLBilliFSangiorgioSN. Wear of an experimental metal-on-metal artificial disc for the lumbar spine. Spine2008; 33: 597–606.
MoghadasPShepherdDETHukinsDWL. Polymer-on-metal or metal-on-polymer total disc arthroplasty: does it make a difference?Spine2012; 37: 1834–1838.
7.
AffatatoSSpinelliMZavalloniM. Predictive role of the lambda ratio in the evaluation of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2008; 222: 617–628.
8.
DowsonDJinZM. Metal-on-metal hip joint tribology. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220: 107–118.
9.
GoldsmithAADowsonDIsaacGH. A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2000; 214: 39–47.
10.
ScholesSCUnsworthA. The tribology of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220: 183–194.
11.
VassiliouKElfickAPDScholesSC. The effect of ‘running-in’ on the tribology and surface morphology of metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing device in simulator studies. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220: 269–277.
12.
ScholesSCGreenSMUnsworthA. The wear of metal-on-metal total hip prostheses measured in a hip simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2001; 215: 523–530.
13.
ParéPEChanFWPowellML. Wear characteristics of the A-MAV™ anterior motion replacement using a spine wear simulator. Wear2007; 263: 1055–1059.
14.
MohadasPMahomedAHukinsDWL. Friction in metal-on-metal disc arthroplasty: effect of ball radius. J Biomech2012; 45: 504–509.
15.
SimonSRRoseRMRadinEL. ‘Stiction-friction’ of total hip prostheses and its relationship to loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am1975; 57: 226–230.
16.
BS ISO 18192-1. Implants for surgery – wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses. Part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding wear conditions for test. London: British Standards Institution, 2008.
17.
ScholesSCUnsworthA. The effects of proteins on the friction and lubrication of artificial joints. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220: 687–693.
18.
ShaheenAShepherdDET. Lubrication regimes in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2007; 221: 621–627.
19.
YaoHGuWY. Physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc during compressive stress relaxation: 3D finite element analysis. Biorheology2006; 43: 323–335.
20.
MoghadasPMahomedAHukinsDWL. Effect of lubricants on friction in laboratory tests of total disc arthroplasty. Med Eng Phys, in press.
21.
TipperJLFirkinsPJBesongAA. Characterisation of wear debris from UHMWPE on zirconia ceramic, metal-on-metal and alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses generated in a physiological anatomical hip joint simulator. Wear2001; 250: 120–128.
22.
NechtowWHinterMBushelowM. IVD replacement mechanical performance depends strongly on input parameters. In: Transactions of the 52nd annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society, 19–22 March2006, Orthopaedic Research Society, Rosemont, IL, USA, 2006.
23.
VicarsRHydePJBrownTD. The effect of anterior-posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc-L TDR. Eur Spine J2010; 19: 1356–1362.
24.
BS ISO 4287. Geometric product specifications (GPS). Surface texture: profile method. Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. London: British Standards Institution, 1997.
25.
BevingtonPR. Data reduction and error analysis in the physical sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1969.
26.
KleinJAHukinsDWL. Relocation of the bending axis during flexion-extension of lumbar intervertebral discs and its implications for prolapse. Spine1983; 8: 659–664.
27.
BlandM. An introduction to medical statistics. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
28.
McKellopHParkSHChiesaR. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop Relat Res1996; 329: S128–S140.
29.
RiekerCKonradRSchounR. In vitro comparison of two hard-hard articulations for total hip replacements. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2001; 215: 153–160.
30.
BisselingPZeilstraDJHolAM. Metal ion levels in patients with a lumbar metal-on-metal total disc replacement: should we be concerned?J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 7: 949–954.
31.
GuyerRDShellockJMacLennanB. Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases. Spine2011; 36: E492–E497.
32.
ZehABeckerCPlanertM. Time-dependent release of cobalt and chromium ions into the serum following implantation of the metal-on-metal Maverick type artificial lumbar disc. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2009; 129: 741–746.
33.
LangtonDJJamesonSSJoyceTJ. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 93: 1011–1016.
34.
UnderwoodRMatthiesACannP. A comparison of explanted articular surface replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing components. J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 93: 1169–1177.
