Experiments and computations were made at a Mach number of 2.0 on a hemispherical blunt nose body with a conical spike of L/D ratio = 1.0. Attempts were made to alter the axisymmetric cavity formation between the spike tip head and the blunt base body. Qualitative measurements and quantitative details indicate the changes which support the drag reduction beyond the conventional sharp spike. Additional drops in drag values were observed by the techniques used in the present investigation. A linear trend of drag reduction is obtained with conical spikes which lead to the drag of a pure conical body.
MehtaRC. Numerical simulation of supersonic flow past reentry capsules. Shock Waves2006; 15(1): 31–41.
2.
KalimuthuRMehtaRCRathakrishnanE. Investigation of aerodynamic coefficients at Mach 6 over conical, hemispherical and flat-face spiked body. The Aeronaut J2017; 121(1245): 1711–1732.
3.
MehtaRC. Numerical heat transfer study over spiked blunt bodies at Mach 6.8. J Spacecraft Rockets2000; 37(5): 700–703.
4.
AhmedMYQinN. Forebody shock control devices for drag and aero-heating reduction: a comprehensive survey with a practical perspective. Prog Aerospace Sci2020; 112: 100585.
5.
ImamuraOWatanukiTSuzukiK, et al.Breathing blunt nose for drag reduction at hypersonic speeds. J visualization2008; 11(4): 280–280.
6.
SatheeshKJagadeeshG. Effect of concentrated energy deposition on the aerodynamic drag of a blunt body in hypersonic flow. Phys Fluids2007; 19(3): 031701.
7.
MeyerBNelsonHFRigginsDW. Hypersonic drag and heat-transfer reduction using a forward-facing jet. J Aircraft2001; 38(4): 680–686.
8.
VenukumarBJagadeeshGReddyKP. Counterflow drag reduction by supersonic jet for a blunt body in hypersonic flow. Phys Fluids2006; 18(11): 118104.
9.
VenukumarBReddyKP. Experimental investigation of drag reduction by forward facing high speed gas jet for a large angle blunt cone at Mach 8. Sadhana2007; 32(1): 123–131.
10.
KulkarniVHegdeGMJagadeeshG, et al.Aerodynamic drag reduction by heat addition into the shock layer for a large angle blunt cone in hypersonic flow. Phys Fluids2008; 20(8): 081703.
11.
KulkarniVReddyKP. Effect of a supersonic counterflow jet on blunt body heat transfer rates for oncoming high enthalpy flow. J Eng Phys Thermophys2009; 82(1): 1–5.
12.
KulkarniVReddyK. Counterflow drag reduction studies for a blunt cone in high enthalpy flow. Int J Hypersonics2010; 1(1): 69–76.
13.
SunXWHuangWGuoZY, et al.Multiobjective design optimization of hypersonic combinational novel cavity and opposing jet concept. J Spacecraft Rockets2017; 54(3): 662–671.
14.
QinQXuJGuoS. Reduction of aeroheating and drag using lateral/oblique/opposing jet on aerodome. J Spacecraft Rockets2018; 55(2): 523–527.
15.
AlbumHH. Regarding the utility of spiked blunt bodies. J Spacecraft Rockets1968; 5(1): 112–114.
16.
GuentherRARedingJP. Fluctuating pressure environment of a drag reduction spike. J Spacecraft Rockets1977; 14(12): 705–710. DOI: 10.2514/3.57253
17.
RedingJPGuentherRARichterBJ. Unsteady aerodynamic considerations in the design of a drag-reduction spike. J Spacecraft Rockets1977; 14(1): 54–60.
18.
MehtaRC. Numerical heat transfer study around a spiked blunt-nose body at Mach 6. Heat Mass Transfer2013; 49(4): 485–496.
19.
MehtaRC. Numerical simulation of the flow field over conical, disc and flat spiked body at Mach 6. The Aeronaut J2010; 114(1154): 225–236.
MikhailAG. Spike-nosed projectiles-computations and dual flow modes in supersonic flight. J Spacecraft Rockets1991; 28(4): 418–424.
23.
MehtaRC. Numerical analysis of pressure oscillations over axisymmetric spiked blunt bodies at Mach 6.80. Shock Waves2002; 11(6): 431–440.
24.
SahooDDasSKumarP, et al.Effect of spike on steady and unsteady flow over a blunt body at supersonic speed. Acta astronautica2016; 128: 521–533.
25.
SahooDKarthickSKDasS, et al.Shock-related unsteadiness of axisymmetric spiked bodies in supersonic flow. Experiments in Fluids2021; 62(4): 1–21.
26.
CrawfordDH.Investigation of the flow over a spiked-nose hemisphere-cylinder at a Mach number of 6.8. NASA-TN-D-118. Washington: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://dp.la/item/e1de7b2f860151cea4f64f4ee1a6ef4d
27.
YamauchiMFujiiKHigashinoF. Numerical investigation of supersonic flows around a spiked blunt body. J Spacecraft Rockets1995; 32(1): 32–42.
28.
KalimuthuRMehtaRCRathakrishnanE. Drag reduction for spike attached to blunt-nosed body at Mach 6. J Spacecraft Rockets2010; 47(1): 219–222.
29.
MenezesVSaravananSReddyKP. Shock tunnel study of spiked aerodynamic bodies flying at hypersonic Mach numbers. Shock Waves2002; 12(3): 197–204.
30.
MenezesVSaravananSJagadeeshG, et al.Experimental investigations of hypersonic flow over highly blunted cones with aerospikes. AIAA J2003; 41(10): 1955–1966.
31.
KobayashHMaruYHongohM, et al.Study on variable-shape supersonic inlets and missiles with MRD device. Acta Astronautica2007; 61(11–12): 978–988.
32.
KobayashiHMaruYFukibaK. Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of telescopic aerospikes with multiple disks. J spacecraft Rockets2007; 44(1): 33–41.
33.
SrinathSReddyKJ. Experimental investigation of the effects of aerospike geometry on aerodynamic drag and heat transfer rates for a blunt body configuration at hypersonic Mach numbers. Int J Hypersonics2010; 1(2): 93–114.
34.
AhmedMYQinN. Drag reduction using aerodisks for hypersonic hemispherical bodies. J Spacecraft Rockets2010; 47(1): 62–80.
35.
AhmedMYQinN. Metamodels for aerothermodynamic design optimization of hypersonic spiked blunt bodies. Aerospace Sci Tech2010; 14(5): 364–376.
36.
AhmedMYQinN. Numerical investigation of aeroheating characteristics of spiked blunt bodies at mach six flight conditions. The Aeronaut J2011; 115(1168): 377–386.
37.
MilicevSSPavlovicMD. Influence of spike shape at supersonic flow past blunt-nosed bodies: experimental study. AIAA J2002; 40(5): 1018–1020.
38.
GauerMPaullA. Numerical investigation of a spiked blunt nose cone at hypersonic speeds. J Spacecraft Rockets2008; 45(3): 459–471.
39.
KalimuthuRMehtaRCRathakrishnanE. Pressure measurements over a hemisphere-cylinder body attached with a forward facing spike. The Aeronaut J2013; 117(1192): 639–646.
40.
KalimuthuRMehtaRCRathakrishnanE. Experimental investigation on spiked body in hypersonic flow. The Aeronaut J2008; 112(1136): 593–598.
41.
KulkarniVMenezesVReddyKP. Effectiveness of aerospike for drag reduction on a blunt cone in hypersonic flow. J Spacecraft Rockets2010; 47(3): 542–544.
42.
MehtaRCJayachandranT. Navier-stokes solution for a heat shield with and without a forward facing spike. Comput Fluids1997; 26(7): 741–754.
43.
ZoreaCRomJ. Effect of a spike on the drag and on the aerodynamic stability of blunt bodies in supersonic flow. J Spacecraft Rockets1970; 7(8): 1017–1019.
44.
MengYSYanLLiSB, et al.Numerical exploration on drag and heat reduction mechanism of a spike-tipped supersonic blunt nose. Mod Phys Lett B2020; 34(32): 2050370.
45.
KnightD. Survey of aerodynamic drag reduction at high speed by energy deposition. J Propulsion Power2008; 24(6): 1153–1167.
46.
XiwanSUHuangWMinOU, et al.A survey on numerical simulations of drag and heat reduction mechanism in supersonic/hypersonic flows. Chin J Aeronautics2019; 32(4): 771–784.
SarwarGKumarPDasS. Insight into the mechanism of drag reduction for a spiked blunt body. Aerospace and Associated Technology: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of ICTACEM 2021, APCATS 2021, AJSAE 2021 and AeSI 2021. Kharagpur: Taylor & Francis: Indian Institute of Technology, 2022, p. 71, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003324539-13.
49.
WhiteJ. Application of navier-stokes flowfield analysis to the aerothermodynamic design of an aerospike-configured missile. Aerospace Design Conference. Irvine, CA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1993, p. 968, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1993-968.
