The paper summarizes the state of the art in aeronautical drag reduction across the speed range for the “conventional” drag components of viscous drag, drag due to lift and wave drag. It also describes several emerging drag-reduction approaches that are either active or reactive/interactive and the drag reduction potentially available from synergistic combinations of advanced configuration aerodynamics, viscous drag-reduction approaches, revolutionary structural concepts and propulsion integration.
BushnellD. M.TuttleM. H.Survey and bibliography on attainment of laminar flow control in air using pressure gradient and suction. NASA RP-1035, 1979.
2.
ThibertJ.ReneauxJ.SchmittV.Onera activities on drag reduction. In 17th ICAS Congress, Stockholm, 1990, pp. 1053–1064.
3.
SzodruchJ.Viscous drag reduction on transport aircraft. AIAA paper 91–0685, 1991.
4.
PriestJ.ReneauxJ.Recent developments in international laminar flow research programs for transport aircraft. Onera TP P-1992–163, 1992.
5.
Laminar flow control technology on aircraft. Mitsubishi Juko Giho, 1988, 25(1), 47–52.
6.
HoughG. R.Viscous Flow Drag Reduction, Vol. 72, AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1980 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
7.
SellinR. H.J.MosesR. T.Drag Reduction in Fluid Flows: Techniques for Friction Control, 1989 (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, West Sussex).
8.
BushnellD. M.HefnerJ. N.Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, Vol. 123, AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1990 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
9.
Improvement of aerodynamic performance through boundary layer control and high lift systems. AGARD CP 365, 1984.
10.
Aircraft drag prediction and reduction. AGARD R-723, 1985.
11.
Special course on concepts for drag reduction. AGARD R-654, 1977.
12.
Special course on skin friction drag reduction. AGARD R-786, 1992.
13.
FiedlerH. E.FernholzH. H.On management and control of turbulent shear flows. Progress in Aerospace Sci., 1990, 27, 305–387.
14.
TuttleM. H.MaddalonD. V.Laminar flow control (1976–1991). NASA TM-107749, 1993.
15.
BarnwellR. W.HussainiM.Natural Laminar Flow and Laminar Flow Control, 1992 (Springer-Verlag).
16.
HefnerJ. N.SaboF. E.Research in natural laminarflow and laminar flow control. NASA CP-2487, Parts 1–3, 1987.
17.
WagnerR. D.BartlettD. W.CollierF. S.JrLaminar flow—the past, present, and prospects. AIAA paper 89–0989, 1989.
18.
HolmesB. J.Flight experiences with laminar flow. NASA CP-2413, 1985, pp. 155–169.
19.
WagnerR. D.FischerM. C.CollierF. S.JrPfenningerW.Supersonic laminar flow control on commercial transports. In 17th ICAS Congress, Stockholm, 1990, pp. 1073–1089.
20.
ArnalD.BulgubureC.Drag reduction by boundary layer laminarization. La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1996, 3, 157–165.
21.
SchmittV.HinsingerR.Advanced transport aircraft aerodynamics in cooperation with Airbus Industrie. La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1996, 4, 265–277.
22.
CousteixJ.ArnalD.CoustolsE.Reduction of aerodynamic skin friction drag. Nouvelle Revue d'Aeronautique et d'Astronautique, April 1993, 1, 23–31.
23.
Gad-el-HakM.PollardA.BonnetJ. P.Flow Control: Fundamentals and Practices, 1998 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
24.
ThiedeP.Drag reduction technologies. In Proceedings of the CEAS/Dragnet European Drag Reduction Conference, Potsdam, Germany, June 2000 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
25.
ChoiK.-S.European drag reduction research—recent developments and current status. Fluid Dynamics Res., May 2000, 26(5), 325–335.
26.
BushnellD. M.Supersonic aircraft drag reduction. AIAA paper 90–1596, 1990.
27.
KuchemannD.The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, 1978 (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
28.
KuchemannD.Aircraft shapes and their aerodynamics for flight at supersonic speeds. Adv. Aero. Sci., 1962, 3, 221–253.
29.
RokhsazK.A brief survey of wing tip devices for drag reduction. SAE paper 93–2574, 1993.
30.
SpillmanJ. J.Wing tip sails: Progress to date and future developments. Aeronaut. J., December 1987, 445–453.
31.
HendersonW. P.HolmesB. J.Induced drag—historical perspective. In SAE Aerotech ‘89 Conference, Anaheim, California, 1989 (Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
32.
BushnellD. M.MalikM.HarveyW. D.Transition prediction in external flows via linear stability theory. In Symposium Transsonicum 3 (Eds ZierepJ.OertelH.), 1989, pp. 225–242 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
33.
MorkovinM. V.Bypass transition to turbulence and research desiderata. In Symposium on Transition in Turbines, NASA CP-2386, 1984.
34.
CollierF. S.JrAn overview of recent subsonic laminarflow control flight experiments. AIAA paper 93–2987, 1993.
35.
MaddalonD. V.BartlettD. W.CollierF. S.JrFifty years of laminar flow flight testing. SAE paper 88–1393, 1988.
36.
WagnerR. D.MaddalonD. V.FisherD. F.Laminar flow control leading edge systems in simulated airline service. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. of Aircr., March 1990, 27(3), 239–244.
37.
MaddalonD. V.BraslowA. L.Simulated-airline-service flight tests of laminar flow control with perforated-surface suction system. NASA TP-2966, 1990.
38.
HenkeR.The Airbus A320 HLF fin programme. Nouvelle Revue d'Aeronautique et d'Astronautique, April 1998, 2, 53–55.
39.
CollierF. S.JrArcaraP. C.JrWieY. S.Hybrid laminar flow control applied to advanced turbofan engine nacelles. SAE paper 92–0962, 1992.
40.
TegardenF. W.Hybrid laminar flow nacelles—a test for the future. In Engine-Airframe Integration Proceedings of the Conference, Bristol, pp. 11.1–11.11 (Royal Aeronautical Society).
41.
MullenderA. J.PollD. I. A.Aircraft drag reduction: The application of natural laminar flow to aero-engine nacelles. Presented at ISABE'95, Derby, October 1995.
42.
KazakovA. V.KoganM. N.KuparevA. V.Improving the stability of a subsonic boundary layer by heating the surface near the leading edge. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 1985, 283, 333–335.
43.
KazakovA. V.KoganM. N.KuparevA. V.Stability of the subsonic boundary layer on a flat plate with surface heating in the neighborhoodof the leading edge. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, 1985, 3, 68–72.
44.
BelovI. A.LitvinovV. M.KazakovA. V.Experimental investigation of the influence of non-uniform surface temperature of the flat plate on laminar boundary layer stability. Uchen. Zap. Tsagi, 1989, 20(3).
45.
DovgalA. V.LevchenkoV. Y.TimofeevV.Boundary control by local heating of the wall. In Laminar-Turbulent Transition, 1990, pp. 113–121 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
46.
DovgalA. V.LevchenkoV. Y.TomofeevV.Effect of local surface heating on the transition to turbulence in a three dimensional gas boundary layer. AN, SSSR, Izvestiya Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Seriia Tekhnicheski Nauki, December 1990, 43–48.
47.
MasadJ. A.NayfehA. H.Laminar flow control of subsonic boundary layers by suction and heat-transfer strips. Physics of Fluids, June 1992, 4(6), 1259–1272.
48.
MalikM. R.Prediction and control of transition in supersonic and hypersonic boundary layers. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., November 1989, 27(11), 1487–1493.
49.
KuziminskiyV. A.Effect of cooling of the wing surface on the transition of laminar boundary layer into turbulent at supersonic speeds of flow. Uchen. Zap. Tsagi, 1981, 12(1).
50.
LekoudisS.The stability of the boundary layer on a swept wing with wall cooling. AIAA paper 79–1495, 1979.
51.
PfenningerW.VemuruC. S.Design aspects of long range supersonic LFC airplanes with highly swept wings. SAE paper 88–1397, 1988.
52.
BushnellD. M.Supersonic Laminar Flow Control, Natural Laminar Flow and Laminar Flow Control, 1992, pp. 233–245 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
53.
PowellA. G.AgrawalS.LaceyT. R.Feasibility and benefits of laminar flow control on supersonic cruise airplanes. NASA CR-181817, 1989.
54.
BushnellD. M.Supersonic aircraft drag reduction. AIAA paper 90–1596, 1990.
55.
FischerM. C.VemuruC. S.Application of laminarflow control to the high speed civil transport—the NASA supersonic laminar flow control program. SAE paper 91–2115, 1991.
56.
AndersonB. T.Bohn-MeyerM.Overview of supersonic laminar flow control research on the F-16XL ships 1 and 2. NASA TM-104257, 1992.
57.
BushnellD. M.MalikM. R.Supersonic laminar flow control. NASA CP-2487, Part 3, 1987, pp. 923–946.
58.
PowellA. G.Supersonic LFC: Challenges and opportunities. In NASA First Annual High Speed Research Workshop, Part 4, 1992, pp. 1823–1840, N94–33526.
59.
FuhrmannH. D.Application of natural laminar flow to a supersonic transport concept. AIAA paper 93–3467-CP, 1993.
60.
ThomasA. S. W.Active wave control of boundary layer transition. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut., 1990, 123, 179–199.
61.
FanX.HofmannL.HerbertT.Active flow control with neural networks. AIAA paper 93–3273, 1993.
62.
KralL.FaselH. F.Numerical investigation of 3-D active control of boundary layer transition. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1991, 29, 1407–1417.
63.
ManuilovichS. V.On the possibility of cancelation of Tollmein-Schlichting waves generated by sound. Dokl. Akad, Nauk. SSSR, 1990, 313(2), 280–282.
64.
JoslinR. D.ErlebacherG.HussainiM. Y.Active control of instabilities in laminar boundary layer flow—Part 1: An overview. NASA CR-195016-PT-1, 1994.
65.
BushnellD. M.Turbulent drag reduction in externalflows. AIAA paper 83–0227, 1983.
66.
KramerB. R.SmithB. C.HeidJ. P.NoffzG. R.RichwineD. M.NgT.Drag reduction experiments using boundary layer heating. In AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 11–14 January 1999, paper A99–16069.
67.
KuryachiiA. P.Similation of the thermal method for reducing turbulent friction. Fluid Dynamics, 1998, 33(1), 48–55.
68.
KazakovA. V.KoganM. N.KuryachiiA. P.Effect of local heat supply to a turbulent boundary layer on the friction. Fluid Dynamics, 1997, 32(1), 39–45.
69.
KazakovA. V.KoganM. N.KuryachiiA. P.Reduction of turbulentfriction under local surface heating. J. Appl. Mechanics and Tech. Physics, 1996, 37(6), 832–838.
70.
HefnerJ. N.BushnellD. M.Viscous drag reduction via surface mass injection. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut., 1990, 123, 457–476.
71.
TillmanT. G.HwangD. P.Drag reduction on a large scale nacelle using a micro-blowing technique. In 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 11–14 January 1999, paper A99–16066.
CoustolsE.SavillA. M.Turbulent skin friction drag reduction by active and passive means. AGARD R-786, 1992.
74.
BruseM.BechertD. W.Van der HoevenJ. G.HageW.HoppeG.Experiments with conventional and with novel adjustable drag-reducing surfaces. In Near Wall Turbulent Flows, 1993, pp. 719–738 (Elsevier Science, Oxford).
75.
CoustolsE.Main features of turbulent drag reduction via microgrooved surfaces—riblets. In Proceedings of the 4th European Computational Dynamics Conference, Athens, Greece, 7–11 September 1998, pp. 594–603 (John Wiley, Chichester).
76.
ViswanathP. R.Riblets on airfoils and wings—a review. In AIAA 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, 1999, paper A99–33353.
77.
JinjunW.Reviews and prospects in turbulent drag reduction over riblet surfaces. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., February 1998, 24(1), 31–34.
78.
CrawfordC. H.ChuD. C.KarniadakisG. E.Laminar and turbulent flow over optimal riblets. In Proceedings of the ‘92 European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 7–11 September 1992, pp. 191–198.
79.
HirschelE. H.FleckensteinH. G.Wall with a drag reducing surface and a method for making such a wall. Pat. 4,907,765, 1990.
80.
DickinsonP. H.ProudleyG. M.Methods of manufacture and surface treatment using laser radiation. Pat. 4,994,639, 1991.
81.
LynchF. T.KlingeM. D.Some practical aspects of viscous drag reduction concepts. SAE paper 91–2129, 1991.
BandyopadhyayP. R.Viscous drag reduction of a nose body. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1989, 27(3), 274–282.
84.
BandyopadhyayP. R.Turbulent boundary layers subjected to multiple curvatures and pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 256, 503–527.
85.
ChiwangaS. C.RamaprianB. R.The effect of convex curvature on the large-scale structure of the turbulent boundary layer. Expl Thermal and Fluid Sci., 1993, 6, 168–176.
AndersonS. D.EatonJ. K.Reynolds stress development in pressure driven three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 202, 263–294.
88.
SendstadO.MoinP.The near wall mechanics of three dimensional turbulent boundary layers. Stanford University Thermosciences Division Report TF-57, 1992.
89.
PfenningerW.BaconJ. W.JrInvestigation of methods for re-establishment of a laminar boundary layer from turbulent flow. Northrop Norair Report NOR 65–48 (BLC-161), 1965.
90.
JungW. J.MangiavacchiN.AkhavanR.Suppression of turbulence in wall bounded flows by high frequency spanwise oscillations. Physics of Fluids, August 1992, 4(8), 1605–1607.
91.
AkhavanR.JungW.MangiavacchiN.Control of wall turbulence by high frequency spanwise oscillations. AIAA paper 93–3282, 1993.
92.
BogardD. G.BallK. S.WassenE.Drag reduction for turbulent boundary layer flows using an oscillating wall. AFRL-SR-BL-TR-00–0629, 2000.
93.
ChoiK.-S.GrahamM.Drag reduction of turbulent pipe flows by circular-wall oscillations. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10(1), 7–9.
94.
LaadhariF.SkandajiL.MorelR.Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanwise oscillating surface. Physics of Fluids, October 1994, 6(10), 3218–3220.
95.
MiyakeY.TsujimotoK.TakahashiM.On the mechanism of drag reduction of near-wall turbulence by wall oscillation. Jap. Soc. Mech. Engrs Int. J., Ser. B, 1997, 40, 558–566.
ChoiK.-S.DeBisschopJ.-B.ClaytonB. R.Turbulent boundary-layer control by means of span-wise-wall oscillation. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1998, 36(7), 1157–1163.
98.
DuY.KarniadakisG. E.Suppressing wall turbulence by means of a transverse traveling wave. Science, 19 May 2000, 288, 1230–1234.
SpanglerJ. G.Effects of periodic blowing through flush transverse slots on turbulent boundary layer skin friction. LTV Report 0–71100/6R-6, 1966.
101.
HandlerR. A.LevichE.SirovichL.Drag reduction in turbulent channel flow by phase randomization. Physics of Fluids A, 1993, 5(3), 686–694.
102.
MurakamiY.StilmanI.LevichE.Reducing turbulence by phase juggling. Physics of Fluids A, 1992, 4(8), 1776–1781.
103.
GunsburgerM. D.HouL.SvobodnyT. P.Boundary velocity control of incompressible flow with application to viscous drag reduction. SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 1992, 30(1), 167–181.
104.
KeefeI. R.Two non-linear control schemes contrasted on a hydrodynamic model. Physics of Fluids A, April 1993, 5(4), 931–947.
105.
ChoiH.TemanR.MoinP.KimJ.Feedback control for unsteady flow and its application to the stochastic burgers equation. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 253, 509–543.
106.
BerkoozG.Controlling models of the turbulent wall layer by boundary deformation. AIAA paper 93–3283, 1993.
Gad-El-HakM.Interactive control of turbulent boundary layers: A futuristic view. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., September 1994, 32(9), 1753–1765.
109.
ChoiH.MoinP.KimJ.Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mechanics, March 1994, 262, 75–110.
110.
WadsworthD. C.MuntzE. P.BlackwelderR. F.ShiflettG. R.Transient energy release pressure driven microactuators for control of wall-bounded turbulent flows. AIAA paper 93–3271, 1993.
111.
XuS. X.Disturbance and drag in turbulent channel flow over a wall with progressive waves. Trans. Japan Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci., February 1994, 36(114), 213–224.
112.
HussainF.A robust scheme for control of skin friction and heat transfer in turbulent boundary layers via a new instability mechanism. AFRL-SR-BL-TR-00–0627, 2000.
113.
KerhoM. F.HeidJ. P.KramerB. R.NgT.Active drag reduction using selective low rate suction. In AIAA 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado, 14–17 August 2000, paper A2000–39931.
114.
HillD. C.Drag reduction strategies. Annual Research Briefs, Stanford University, California, 1994, pp. 215–218, paper N95–22437.
115.
KimJ.Advanced concepts for boundary layer control. AFRL-SR-BL-TR-98–0707, 1998.
116.
ChanghoonL.KimJ.BabcockD.GoodmanR.Application of neural networks to turbulence control for drag reduction. Physics of Fluids, June 1997, 9(6), 1740–1747.
117.
KoumoutsakosP.MoinP.Algorithms for shear flow control and optimization. In Proceedings of 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 3, 1999, pp. 2839–2844.
118.
KumarS. M.ReynoldsW. C.KennyT. W.MEMS based transducers for boundary layer control. In IEEE 12th International MEMS 99 Conference, 1999, pp. 135–140.
119.
EndoT.KasagiN.SuzukiY.Feedback control of wall turbulence with wall deformations. Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, October 2000, 21(5), 568–575.
120.
KangS.ChoiH.Active wall motions for skin friction drag reduction. Physics of Fluids, December 2000, 12(12), 3301–3304.
121.
SchoppaW.HussainF.A large scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers. Physics of Fluids, May 1998, 10(5), 1049–1051.
122.
KoumoutsakosP.Vorticity flux control for a turbulent channel flow. Physics of Fluids, February 1999, 11(2), 248–250.
123.
KrooI.McMastersJ.SmithS. C.Highly nonplanar lifting systems. NASA CP 10184, Part 1, February 1996, pp. 331–370.
124.
ZimmerH.The aerodynamic optimization of wings at subsonic speeds and the influence of wingtip design. NASA TM-88534, 1987.
LamF.MaullD. J.Induced drag of a crescent wing planform. J. Aircr., 1993, 30(5), 594–602.
127.
LyapunovS. V.Nonplanar wings with a minimum induced drag. Mekh. Zhid. I Gaza, March-April 1993, 2, 103–109.
128.
SugimotoA.SatoJ.Effect of wing planforms on induced drag reduction. Jap. Soc. Aeronaut. and Space Sci. J., 1992, 40(466), 603–609.
129.
KolobkovA. N.NikolaevM. I.Minimization of the induced drag of nonplanar lifting systems. In Problems in the Aerodynamics of Flight Vehicles and Their Parts, 1991, pp. 52–57, paper A93–48910.
130.
MortaraK. W.StraussfogelD. M.MaughmerM. D.Analysis and design of planar and nonplanar wings for induced drag minimization. NASA CR-191274, 1992.
131.
JonesR. T.Classical aerodynamic theory. NASA RP-1050, 1979.
132.
DehaanM. A.Induced drag of wings with highly swept and tapered wing tips. AIAA paper 90–3062, 1990.
133.
LowsonM. V.Minimum induced drag for wings with spanwise camber. J. Aircr., July 1990, 27, 627–631.
134.
ArdonceauP. L.Aerodynamic properties of crescent wing planforms. J. Aircr., March 1994, 31(2), 462–465.
135.
ConeC. D.JrThe theory of induced lift and minimum induced drag of nonplanar lifting systems. NASA TR-139, 1962.
136.
NaikD. A.OstowairC.An aerodynamic comparison of planar and non-planar outboard wing planforms. In 16th ICAS Conference, 1988, vol. 1, pp. 468–480.
137.
LundryJ. L.LissamanP. B. S.A numerical solution for the minimum induced drag of nonplanar wings. J. Aircr., 1968, 5(1), 17–21.
138.
Van DamC. P.Swept wing tip shapes for low speed airplanes. SAE paper 85AA-9, 1985.
139.
Van DamC. P.Induced-drag characteristics of crescent-moon-shaped wings. J. Aircr., 1987, 24(2), 115–119.
140.
VijgenP. M.Van DamC. P.HolmesB. J.Sheared wing tip aerodynamics: Wind tunnel and computational investigation of induced drag reduction. AIAA paper 87–2481CP, 1987.
141.
BushnellD. M.MooreK. J.Synopsis of drag reductionin nature. Annual Rev. of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 23.
142.
WhitcombR. T.Methods for reducing subsonic drag due to lift. AGARD Report 654, 1977, pp. 2.1–2.17.
143.
WhitcombR. T.A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets. NASA TND-8260, 1976.
144.
HeysonH. H.RiebeG. D.FultonC.Theoretical parametric study of the relative advantages of winglets and wing tip extensions. NASA TMX-74003, 1977.
145.
KC-135 Winglet Program Review, NASA CP-2211, 1982.
146.
YatesJ. E.DonaldsonC. D.A fundamental study of drag and an assessment of conventional drag-due-to-lift reduction devices. NASA CR-4004, September 1986.
147.
KuhlmanJ. M.LiawP.CerneyM. J.Theoretical/numerical study of feasibility of use of winglets on low aspect ratio wings at subsonic and transonic Mach numbers to reduce drag. NASA CR-4174, 1988.
148.
HackettJ. E.Vortex drag reduction by aft-mounted diffusing vanes. ICAS paper 80–13.4, 1980.
149.
WebberG. W.DansbyT.Wing tip devices for energy conversion and other purposes. Can. Aeronaut. Space J., June 1983, 29(2), 105–120.
150.
HackettJ. E.Vortex diffuser. US Pat. 4,190,219, February 1980.
151.
SpillmanJ. J.The use of wing tip sails to reduce vortex drag. Aeronaut. J., September 1978, 387–395.
152.
BoydT. M.JrThe effect of blade tip vanes on helicopter rotor performance. AIAA paper DAY/CIN 84–1, 1984.
153.
SpillmanJ. J.McVitieA. M.Wing tip sails which give lower drag at all normal flight speeds. Aeronaut. J., October 1984, 362–369.
154.
DaxiY.Wing tip sails tested on Y-5 aircraft. Int. Aviation, May 1985, 5, 2–3.
155.
JanusJ. M.ChatterjeeA.CaveC.Computational analysis of methods for reduction of induced drag. AIAA paper 93–0524, 1993.
156.
KeenanJ. A.KuhlmanJ. M.The effects of winglets on low aspect ratio wings at supersonic Mach numbers. NASA CR-4407, 1991.
157.
EpplerR.Induced drag and winglets. Aerospace Sci. Technol., 1997, 1(1), 3–15.
158.
LaRocheU.PalffyS.WING-GRID, a novel device for reduction of induced drag on wings. ICAS 20th Congress, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 2303–2309.
159.
DegenM.JohnsonA. R.ThompsonW. E.Aerodynamic characteristics of ring wings and ring wing-body combinations. WADC Report TP 46–442, 1957.
160.
LetcherJ. S.JrV-wings and diamond ring wings of minimum induced drag. J. Aircr., August 1972, 9(8), 605–607.
161.
GallP. D.SmithH. C.Aerodynamic characteristics of biplanes with winglets. J. Aircr., August 1987, 24(8), 518–522.
162.
PattersonJ. C.JrFlechnerS. G.An exploratory wind-tunnel investigation of the wake effect of a panel tip-mounted fan-jet engine on the lift-induced vortex. NASA TND-5729, 1970.
163.
PattersonJ. C.JrBartlettG. R.Evaluation of installed performance of a wing-tip mounted pusher turboprop on a semi-span wing. NASA TP-2739, 1987.
164.
PattersonJ. C.JrBartlettG. R.Effect of a wing tip mounted pusher turboprop on the aerodynamic performance of a semi-span wing. AIAA paper 85–1347, 1985.
165.
YuanS. W.BloomA. M.Experimental investigation of wing-tip vortex abatement. ICAS paper 74–35, 1974.
166.
WuJ. M.VakiliA.ChenZ. L.Wing tip jets aerodynamic performance. ICAS paper 82–5.6.3, 1982.
167.
WuJ. M.VakiliA. D.GilliamF. T.Aerodynamic interactions of wing tip flow with discrete wing tip jets. AIAA paper 84–2206, 1984.
168.
TavellaD. A.WoodN. J.HarritsP.Influence of tip blowing on rectangular wings. AIAA paper 85–5001, 1985.
169.
Lockheed studies a commercial transport with a ring wing. Aviation Int., 15–31 January 1983, 842, 38–39.
170.
Ring wing promises less drag, lower weight. Mach. Des., 7 October 1982, 54(23), 2.
171.
ChiocchiaG.PignataroS.On the induced drag reduction due to propeller-wing interaction. Aeronaut. J., October 1995, 328–336.
172.
JanusJ. M.ChatterjeeA.CaveC.Computational analysis of a wingtip-mounted pusher turboprop. J. Aircr., 1995, 33(2), 441–444.
173.
JohnstonR. T.WitkowskiD.SullivanJ. P.Propeller wakes and their interaction with wings. In 9th ISABE, 1989, vol. 2, pp. 1070–1077.
174.
SnyderM. H.ZumwaltG. W.Effects of wingtip-mounted propellers on wing lift and induced drag. J. Aircr., 1969, 6(5), 382–397.
175.
KrooI.Propeller-wing integration for minimum induced loss. AIAA paper, 84–2470, 1984.
176.
MirandaL. R.BrennanJ. E.Aerodynamic effects of wingtip-mounted propellers and turbines. AIAA paper 86–1802, 1986.
177.
WitkowskiD. P.LeeA. H.SullivanJ. P.Aerodynamic interaction between propellers and wings. J. Aircr., 1989, 26(9), 829–836.
178.
BowersP. M.Unconventional Aircraft, p. 97 (Tab Books).
179.
GallmanJ. W.Structural and aerodynamic optimization of joined wing aircraft. Thesis, Stanford University, University Microfilms DA9234097, 1992.
180.
LothJ. L.LothF.Induced drag reduction with wing tip mounted propellers. AIAA paper 84–2149, 1984.
181.
ChoJ.WilliamsM. H.Propeller-wing interaction using a frequency domain panel method. J. Aircr., 1990, 27(3), 196–203.
182.
RossowV. J.Theoretical study of lift-generated vortex wakes designed to avoid rollup. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 13 (4), 476–484.
183.
BrownC. E.McLeanF. E.The problem of obtaining high lift drag ratios at supersonic speeds. J. Aerospace Sci., May 1959, 26(5), 298–302.
184.
JonesR. T.Estimated lift-drag ratios at supersonic speed. NACA TN-1350, 1947.
185.
JonesR. T.Theoretical determination of the minimum drag of airfoils at supersonic speeds. J. Aeronaut. Sci., 1952, 19(12), 813–822.
186.
WhitcombR. T.FischettiT. L.Development of a supersonic area rule and an application to the design of a wing-body configuration having high lift-to-drag ratios. NACA RM-L53H31A, 1956.
187.
WhitcombR. T.Some considerations regarding the application of the supersonic area rule to the design of airplane fuselages. NACA RM-L56E23A, 1956.
188.
NielsenJ. N.PittsW. C.General theory of wave drag reduction for combinations employing quasi-cylindrical bodies with an application to swept-wing and body combinations. NACA TN-3722, 1956.
189.
HeasletM. A.FullerF. B.Drag minimization for wings and bodies in supersonic flow. NACA R-1385, 1958.
190.
YoshiharaH.KainerJ.StrandT.On optimum thin lifting surfaces at supersonic speeds. J. Aerospace Sci., 1958, 25(8), 473–479.
191.
WhitcombR. T.SevierJ. R.JrA supersonic area rule and an application to the design of a wing-body combination with high lift-drag ratios. NASA TR-72, 1960.
192.
DasA.On some basic and new aspects about the drag problem of wings and bodies in supersonic flows. AGARD CP-124, 1973, pp. 3.1–3.26.
193.
NastaseA.Optimum-optimorum wing-fuselage configuration for supersonic transport aircraft of second generation. ICAS paper 86–1.3.6, 1986.
194.
BosH. J.Optimum supersonic wings with subsonic leading edges. J. Aircr., 1986, 23(4), 326–332.
195.
BargerR. L.A method for designing blended wing-body configurations for low wave drag. NASA TP-3261, 1992.
196.
ChangJ-F.Minimizing supersonic wave drag with physical constraints at design and off-design Mach numbers. J. Aircr., 1992, 29(4), 716–718.
197.
CarmichaelR. L.The prospects of aerodynamic performance gains from wing camber and twist at low hypersonic Mach numbers. NASA SP-148, 1967, pp. 79–86.
198.
BrownC. E.McLeanF. E.KlunkerE. B.Theoretical and experimental studies of cambered and twisted wings optimized for flight at supersonic speeds. Adv. Aeronaut. Sci., 1961, 3, 415–430.
199.
CarlsonH. W.Pressure distribution at Mach number 2.05 on a series of highly swept arrow wings employing various degrees of twist and camber. NASA TN-D-1264, 1962.
200.
BerdyuginA. E.FominV. M.FormichevV. P.Body drag control in supersonic gas flows by injection of liquid jets. Prikl. Mekh. I Tekh. Fiz., 1995, 36(5), 40–47.
201.
LukyanovG. A.Drag of an object in supersonic flow with an isobaric region of energy release in front of the object. Tech. Phys. Lett., 1999, 25(1), 29–31.
202.
RigginsD.NelsonH. F.JohnsonE.Blunt body wave drag reduction using focused energy deposition. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1999, 37(4), 460–467.
203.
BogdonoffS. M.VasI. E.Preliminary investigation of spiked bodies at hypersonic speeds. J. Aerospace Sci., 1959, 26(2), 65–74.
204.
HinandaM.YamashitaN.KarashimaK.SatoK.HondaM.Effects of spikes and flange-like steps on rocket drag at supersonic speeds. Adv. Astronaut. Sci., 1986, 60, 669–677, AAS paper 85–682.
205.
KarlovskiiV. N.SakharovV. I.Numerical investigation of supersonic flow past blunt bodies with protruding spikes. Fluid Dynamics, 1986, 21(3), 437–445.
206.
RedingJ. P.GuentherR. A.RichterB. J.Unsteady aerodynamic considerations in the design of a drag-reduction spike. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, January 1977, 14, 54–60.
207.
MairW. A.Experiments on separation of boundary layers on probes in front of blunt-nosed bodies in a supersonic airstream. Phil. Mag., Ser. 7, 1955, 43(342), 695–716.
208.
MaullD. J.Hypersonic flow over axially symmetric spiked bodies. J. Fluid Mechanics, August 1960, 8(4), 584–592.
209.
HuntG. K.Supersonic wind tunnel study of reducing the drag of a bluff body at incidence by means of a spike. RAE Aero Report 2606, 1958.
210.
BelovI. A.TsymbalovV. V.LunkinI.Flow control in a shock layer on a body of revolution. NASA TM-77857.
211.
ArafailovS. I.Effect of energy release in the shock layer on supersonic flight. Fluid Dynamics, January 1988, 22(4), 645–649.
212.
BelokonV. A.RudenkoO. V.KhokhlovR. V.Aerodynamic effects of supersonic flow past a laser beam. Sov. Phys.—Acoust., July-August 1977, 23, 361–362.
213.
KrasnobaevK. V.Supersonic flow past weak sources of radiation. Fluid Dynamics, July-August 1984, 19(4), 629–632.
214.
GeorgievskiiP. Y.LevinV. A.Supersonic flow about objects with external heat—evolution sources. Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett., April 1988, 14(4), 684–687.
215.
KoganM. N.KucherovA. N.UstinovM. V.The effect of thermal self action of a light beam in a shear flow. J. Engng Phys., January 1987, 52(1), 39–44.
216.
ChapmanD. R.Reduction of profile drag at supersonic velocities by the use of airfoil sections having a blunt trailing edge. NACA TN-3503, 1955.
217.
KulfanR. M.Application of favorable aerodynamic interference to supersonic airplane design. SAE paper 90–1988, 1990.
218.
BoydJ. A.Optimal utilization of supersonic favorable interference to obtain high lift-drag ratios. AIAA paper 65–752, 1965.
219.
SearsW. R.TanH. S.The aerodynamics of supersonic biplanes. Q. Appl. Math., April 1951, 9, 67–76.
220.
FerriA.ClarkeJ. H.On the use of interfering flowfields for the reduction of drag at supersonic speeds. J. Aero. Sci., January 1957, 24, 1–18.
221.
GrahamE. W.LigerstromP. A.LicherR. M.BeaneB. J.A theoretical investigation of the drag of generalized aircraft configurations in supersonic flow. NACA TM-1421, 1957.
222.
RossowV. J.A theoretical study of the lifting efficiency at supersonic speeds of wings utilizing indirect lift induced by vertical surfaces. NACA RM-A55L08, 1956.
223.
BroglioL.Theoretical and experimental analysis of cowling configuration for the reduction of the drag on a body of revolution with large cone angle. Scuola Di Ingegneria Aeronautica, Universita Di Roma, SIAR Graph 7, June 1956.
224.
JohnsonR. P.Theoretical development for lifting ring-body configurations. Rand Corp. RM-2260, AD 207751, 1958.
225.
BrowandF. K.The design and test of a zero wave drag ring-wing configuration. Rand Corp. RM 2638, 1960.
226.
MorrisO.Aerodynamic characteristics in pitch of several ring-wing-body configurations at a Mach number of 2.2. NASA TND-1272, 1962.
227.
JohnsonR. P.Drag transformation and reduction for bodies of revolution. Rand Corp., RM-2107, AD-156008, 1957.
228.
LicherR. M.Calculation of the thickness and radial force distribution for a ring wing having zero drag at supersonic speeds. Douglas Aircraft Company Report SM-23579, 1959.
229.
TerryJ. E.Aerodynamic characteristics of ring wings, a bibliography. US Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, RSIC-285, 1965.
230.
VisichM.JrMartellucciA.Theoretical and experimental analysis of a cowling as a means of drag reduction for an axisymmetric center body. AFOSR TN-58–760, 1958.
231.
ErdmannS. F.ZandbergenP. J.A survey of 10 years of NLR activities on ring wing-body (1956–1966). NLR TR-69070U, 1976.
232.
JohnsonA. R.MeadH. R.ScheuingR. A.An experimental investigation of simple symmetric and unsymmetric supersonic ring wing configurations utilizing beneficial interference effects. Grumman Research Department Report RE-175, 1964.
233.
GordP. R.Development of an analytical model for predicting the first order effects of fuselage-to-wing favorable aerodynamic interference at M = 4.5. AFWAL TR-83–3049, 1983.
234.
MorrisO. A.LambM.Aerodynamic characteristics in pitch of a modified half-ring-wing-body combination and a swept wing-body combination at Mach 2.16 to 3.7. NASA TM-1551, 1968.
235.
MorrisO. A.MackR. J.Aerodynamic characteristics of a parasol wing-body combination utilizing favorable lift interference at Mach numbers from 3.0 to 4.63. NASA TND-4855, 1968.
KulfanR. M.YoshiharaH.LordB. J.FriebelG. O.Application of supersonic favorable aerodynamic interference to fighter type aircraft. AFFDL-TR-78–33, 1978.
BeaneB. J.RyanB. M.Supersonic drag calculations for a cylindrical shell wing of semi-circular cross section combined with a central body of revolution. Douglas Aircraft Report SM-22627, October 1956.
240.
WoodR. M.RoseO. J.McMillinS. N.Multi-body concept: Old concept-new application. NASA CP-2398, 1985, vol. 2, pp. 235–249.
241.
WoodR. M.MillerD. S.BrentnerK. S.Theoretical and experimental investigation of supersonic aerodynamic characteristics of a twin-fuselage concept. NASA TP-2184, 1983.
242.
BauerS. X.S.HernandezG.Reduction of cross-flow shock induced separation with a porous cavity at supersonic speeds. AIAA paper 88–2557, 1988.
243.
FriedmanM. D.CohenD.Arrangement of fusiform bodies to reduce the wave drag at supersonic speeds. NACA Report 1236, 1955.
244.
NielsenJ. N.Arrays for minimum wave drag of bodies of revolution. AIAA paper 85–0449, 1985.
245.
Large payload capacity SST concepts—technical and economic feasibility. NASA CR-165934, 1992.
246.
WoodR. M.RoseO. J.McMillinS. N.Effect of body cross-sectional shape on the supersonic aerodynamics of multibody configurations. NASA TP-2587, 1986.
247.
McMillinS. N.WoodR. M.Planform effects on the supersonic aerodynamics of multibody configurations. NASA TP-2762, 1987.
248.
McMillinS. N.WoodR. M.Planform effects for low-fineness ratio multibody configurations at supersonic speeds. AIAA paper 86–1799, 1986.
249.
DollyhighS. M.CoenP. G.Advanced technology and unconventional aircraft concepts. In Unconventional Aircraft Concepts, 1987, pp. 52–71 (Delft University Press).
250.
SquireL. C.The use of excess engine exit area over intake area to reduce zero lift drag at high supersonic speeds. Aeronaut. Q., August 1965, 260–274.
251.
SuikatR.FarokhiS.Method to optimize nacelle shape in a supersonic cruise aircraft. J. Aircr., August 1988, 25, 717–723.
252.
SigallaA.HallstaffT. H.Aerodynamics of power-plant installation on supersonic aircraft. J. Aircr., 1967, 4(4), 273–277.
253.
ErdosJ.RayR.MandelM.Aeromechanical applications of favorable supersonic interference. AFWAL TR-82–3020.
254.
NicholsM. R.Aerodynamics of airframe-engine integration of supersonic aircraft. NASA TND-3390, 1966.
255.
RobinsA.WarnerWhitcombR. T.Additional configuration approaches. NASA TMX-905, 1963, pp. 277–290.
WoodR. M.Multibody aircraft with an all-movable center fuselage actively controlling fuselage pressure drag. US Pat. 14,735,381, 1988.
258.
Gad-El-HakM.BushnellD. M.Separation control Review. J. Fluids Engng, March 1991, 113, 5–30.
259.
HsiungJ.-L.ChowC.-Y.Computed drag reduction on a projectile using porous surfaces. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, May-June 1995, 32(3), 450–455.
260.
BurR.CorbelB.DeleryJ.Study of passive control in a transonic shock wave/boundary-layer interaction. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., March 1998, 36(3), 394–400.
261.
SerbanescuE.SavuG.Drag reduction of perforated axisymmetric bodies in supersonic flow. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 1985, 22(6), 663–665.
262.
BauerS. X.S.McMillinS. N.Experimental and theoretical study of the effects of wing geometry on a supersonic multibody configuration. AIAA paper 88–2510, 1988.
263.
NagamatsuH. T.TrillingT. W.BossardJ. A.Passive drag reduction on complete NACA 0012 airfoil at transonic Mach numbers. AIAA paper 87–1263, 1987.
264.
GuptaA.RuffinS. M.NewfieldM. E.YatesL.Aerothermodynamic performance enhancement of sphere-cones using the artificially blunted leading edge concept. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 2000, 37(2), 235–241.
265.
GuptaA.RuffinS. M.Optimal artificially blunted leading-edge airfoils for enhanced aerothermodynamic performance. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 1999, (4), 499–506.
SevantN. E.BloorM. I.G.WilsonM. J.Cost-effective multipoint design of a blended high speed civil transport. J. Aircr., August 1999, 36(4), 642–650.
274.
OserM. D.Eliminating flow separation and reducing viscous drag through boundary layer analysis and manipulation. Langley Aerospace Research Summer Scholars, 1995, pp. 555–563, paper N97–11867.
275.
GageP.New approaches to optimization in aerospace conceptual design. NASA CR-196695, 1995.
276.
ZedanM. F.SeifA. A.Al-MoufadiS.Drag reduction of airplane fuselages through shaping by the inverse method. J. Aircr., 1994, 31(2), 279–287.
277.
MartinsA. L.CatalanoF. M.Viscous drag optimization for a transport mission adaptive wing. In 21st ICAS Congress, 1998, paper A98–31499.
