A hybrid trim strategy for coaxial compound helicopter

Abstract

Interest in the coaxial compound helicopter (CCH) has been increasing in the civil aviation and engineering community for its high-speed and high-maneuverability features, and is likely to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Since the control in CCH is totally different from the conventional helicopter, the redundant control strategy design is one of the biggest challenges. In this study, the CCH model based on XH-59A is built to investigate the impact of the propeller and the elevator on the flight performance. Four trim strategies with different objectives are proposed and then compared to find the optimal control allocation. A heuristic descent search method is applied to search the optimal velocity at which the propeller and the elevator are engaged. A significant improvement of power required at medium- and high-speed with acceptable rotor airloads increment was found by using the Hybrid Trim strategy in the speed range of 0–100 m/s, with regard to a pre-configured pitch angle schedule. The corresponding control variables obtained located in a reasonable control range, with a maximum power reduced of 13% at 100 m/s, which showcase the potential of the Hybrid Trim strategy.

Keywords

coaxial compound helicopter trim strategy optimization elevator control control redundancy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jinghui

. The ABC rotor technology for high speed helicopter. Aero Sci Technol 2012; 3: 9–14.

Ruddell

. Advancing blade concept (ABC) development. J Am Helicopter Soc 1977; 22: 13–23.

Burgess

. The ABC rotor-a historical perspective. In: American helicopter society 60th annual forum 2004, Washington, DC, pp.7–10.

Walsh

Weiner

Arifian

, et al. High airspeed testing of the sikorsky x2 technologytm demonstrator. In: American Helicopter Society 67th Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, 2011.

Ferguson

Thomson

. Flight dynamics investigation of compound helicopter configurations. J Aircraft 2015; 52(1): 156–167.

Ferguson

Thomson

. Performance comparison between a conventional helicopter and compound helicopter configurations. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng P I MECH ENG G-J AER 2015; 229: 2441–2456.

Zhang

Zhao

Huang

, et al. Aerodynamic performance evaluation of XH-59A helicopter rotor in forward flight. In: AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum, Indianapolis, IN, 19–22 August 2019, p. 4386.

Yuan

Thomson

Chen

. Propeller control strategy for coaxial compound helicopters. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng P I MECH ENG G-J AER 2019; 233: 3775–3789.

Yuan

Thomson

Chen

. Longitudinal control strategy for coaxial compound helicopter. In: Vertical Flight Society 75th Annual Forum & Technology Display 2019; PA, Philadelphia, 13–16 May 2019.

10.

Ozdemir

Horn

Thorsen

. In-flight multi-variable optimization of redundant controls on a compound rotorcraft. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference 2013, Boston, MA, 19–22 August 2013, p. 5165.

11.

Reddinger

J-P

Gandhi

. Response surface estimation of trim controls for a compound helicopter with control redundancy. In: 72th VFS Annual Forum, West Palm Beach, Florida 17–19 May 2016.

12.

Reddinger

J-P

Gandhi

. Neural network and machine learning allocation of redundant controls for power optimization on a compound helicopter. In: 73rd Annual Forum American Helicopter Society, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 9–11 May 2017, pp.1507–1519.

13.

Chen Renliang

Kong

. A review of mathematical modeling of helicopter flight dynamics. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sinica 2017; 38: 520915. DOI: 10.7527/s1000-6893.2017.520915

14.

Ferguson

. Towards a better understanding of the flight mechanics of compound helicopter configurations. University of Glasgow, 2015.

15.

Zhou

G-Y

J-Z

Cao

Y-H

, et al. Research on a mathematical model for coaxial helicopter flight dynamics. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sinica 2003; 24: 293–295.

16.

Zhou

Zhao

Deng

, et al. Analysis of XH-59A rotor in forward flight with high efficiency trim method. In: 31th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 09 September, 2018.

17.

Thomson

DG.

Development of a Generic Helicopter Mathematical Model for Application to Inverse Simulation

. Glasgow: Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, 1992. Internal Report No. 9216.

18.

Padfield

. Helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and application of flying qualities and simulation modelling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

19.

Phelps

III Mineck

. Aerodynamic characteristics of a counter-rotating, coaxial, hingeless rotor helicopter model with auxiliary propulsion. Hampton, Va: Langley Research Center, 1978.

20.

S-J

, et al. Research on control redundancy of advancing blade concept high-speed helicopter. Aeronaut Sci Techn 2020; 31: 59–66.

21.

Cao

Wang

. Flight dynamics modeling, trim, stability, and controllability of coaxial compound helicopters. J Aerosp Eng 2021; 34: 04021084.

22.

Yuan

Thomson

Chen

. Investigation of lift offset on flight dynamics characteristics for coaxial compound helicopters. J Aircraft 2019; 56: 2210–2222.

23.

Kanzow

Yamashita

Fukushima

. WITHDRAWN: Levenberg-Marquardt methods with strong local convergence properties for solving nonlinear equations with convex constraints. J Comput Appl Math 2005; 173: 321–343.

24.

Yeo

Johnson

. Investigation of maximum blade loading capability of lift-offset rotors. J Am Helicopter Soc 2014; 59: 1–12. DOI: 10.4050/JAHS.59.012005