Effect of standoff distance and area ratio on the performance of circular exhaust ejector using computational fluid dynamics

Abstract

Numerical investigation is carried out to study the effect of standoff distance and area ratio on mass entrainment of an air–air circular exhaust ejector. Nozzle and mixing tube are the two components of an ejector, and for the present study, circular cross section shape has been chosen. Numerical simulations have been carried out at Reynolds number in the range of 6.85 × 10⁴ and 4.11 × 10⁵. Area ratio is varied between 1.25 < area ratio < 4 and standoff distance is varied from 1D_nz < standoff distance < 4D_nz, where D_nz represent the nozzle exit diameter. It is observed that for the ejector configuration with area ratio as 2, 2.25, and 2.5, the mass entrainment characteristics are nearly independent of standoff distance between 1D_nz to 4D_nz. For ejector configuration with area ratio below 2, mass entrainment decreases with increase in standoff distance. For ejector configuration with area ratio greater than 2.5, mass entrainment increases with increase in standoff distance for the range investigated and has the tendency to taper off beyond 4D_nz for most of the area ratios. Effect of change in mixing tube length is also studied. It is seen that the mass entrainment improves with increase in length up to 8D_nz. Further increase in length does not effect mass entrainment. This study provides important guidelines that can aid in arriving at an optimal design of circular exhaust ejectors.

Keywords

Ejectors mass entrainment standoff distance area ratio mixing length computational fluid dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

et al.

Recent developments in ejector refrigeration technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013; 19: 629–651.

Zhang H and Ball DW. Inlet bleed heat system with ejector/mixer nozzles for noise reduction. Patent 8,272,222, USA, 2012.

Bryden

. Tank vapors: Optimize ejector sizing for better control. Chem Eng 2011; 118: 52–54.

Han

. Study on blasting driving roadway single transformation ejector auxiliary ventilation. Advanced materials research 2011; vol. 228, Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, pp. 836–840.

Giles

. Thrust augmentors for rockets: Greater efficiency through air ejector tubes. Astronautics 1944; 14: 4–12.

Mitchell JW and London AL. Design parameters for subsonic air-air ejectors. Technical Report 40, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1958.

Bonnington

King

. Jet Pumps and Ejectors-A State of the Art Review and Bibliography, London, UK: British Hydromechanics Research Association, Fluid Engineering, 1972.

Reddy

Kar

. Theory and performance of water jet pump. J Hydraul Div 1968; 94: 1261–1282.

Silvester

Mueller

NHG

. Design data for the liquid-liquid jet pump. J Hydraul Res 1968; 6: 129–162.

10.

Mueller

. Water jet pump. J Hydraul Div 1964; 90: 83–113.

11.

Vyas B and Kar S. Study of entrainment and mixing process for an air to air jet ejector. In: Symposium on jet pumps and ejectors and gas lift techniques, 2nd, Cambridge, England, 24–26 March 1975, Proceedings (A76-38476 19-34) Cranfield, Beds., England, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1975, pp.C2-15 to C2-25, vol. 1, p.2.

12.

Sen S. Studies on flow characteristics of a stepped conical diffuser with passive suction. PhD Thesis, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, 2008.

13.

Toulmay

et al.

Internal aerodynamics of infrared suppressors for helicopter engines. J Am Helicopt Soc 1988; 33: 4–14.

14.

Maqsood

Birk

. Experimental and CFD study of exhaust ejectors with bent mixing tubes. ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for land, sea, and air, Reno, Nevada, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2005, pp. 155–165.

15.

Maqsood

Birk

. Effect of a bend on the performance of an oblong ejector. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for land, sea, and air, Montreal, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2007, pp. 37–45.

16.

et al.

Research on the rectangular lobed exhaust ejector/mixer systems. Trans-Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 1999; 41: 187–194.

17.

Singh P. Studies on non circular stepped ejector diffuser. PhD Thesis, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, 2009.

18.

Chen Q. Performance of air-air ejectors with multi-ring entraining diffusers. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, 2008.

19.

Maqsood A. A study of subsonic air-air ejectors with short bent mixing tubes. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, 2008.

20.

Engineering D. W. R. Davis Engineering Limited, http://www.davis-eng.com/ (1975, accessed 15 June 2017).

21.

Singh P, et al. Effect of number of slots and overlap on the performance of Non-circular Ejector Air Diffuser. In: 43rd AIAA fluid dynamics conference, San Diego, California, US, 2013, p. 2729.

22.

Launder

Spalding

. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1974; 3: 269–289.

23.

Shih

T-H

et al.

A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 1995; 24: 227–238.

24.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32: 1598–1605.

25.

Ricou

Spalding

. Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetrical turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 1961; 11: 21–32.

26.

Cortesi

et al.

Numerical investigation of the entrainment and mixing processes in neutral and stably-stratified mixing layers. Phys Fluids (1994-Present) 1999; 11: 162–185.