Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the supersonic steam ejector. Part 1: Comparative study of different equations of state

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the use of computational fluid dynamics in predicting the performance and geometry of the optimal design of a steam ejector used in a steam turbine. Many scholars have analysed the steam ejector using the ideal gas model, which lacks accuracy in terms of calculating the flow field of the ejector. This study is reported in a series of two papers. The first part covers the validation of CFX 11.0 results using different equations of state (EOS) on the converging–diverging nozzle flow field carried out with the experimental value. The IAPWS IF97 real gas model works well with the experimental value. The flow field of the ejector was analysed using different EOS after grid-dependent learning. The results show that the performance of the ejector was underestimated under the ideal gas model; the entrainment ratio was 20–40 per cent lower than when using the real gas model. The effect of the optimal geometrical design and operating conditions will be discussed in Part 2.

Keywords

ejector computational fluid dynamics IAPWS IF97 ideal gas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mario

L. F.

Davide

Design and testing of ejectors for high temperature fuel cell hybrid systems. Trans. ASME, 2006, 3, 284–291.

Zhang

Xue

Experiment study and guidelines of high-pressure gas ejector. J. Therm. Sci. Technol., 2004, 3, 133–138.

Rusly

CFD analysis of ejector in a combined ejector cooling system. Int. J. Refrig., 2005, 28, 1092–1101.

Badr

Naik

Rotary Wankel engine as expansion devices in steam Rankine-cycle engines. Appl. Energy, 1991, 39, 59–76.

Sriveerakul

Aphornratana

Chunnanond

Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 1. Validation of the CFD results. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2007, 46, 812–822.

Sriveerakul

Aphornratana

Chunnanond

Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 2. Flow structure of a steam ejector influenced by operating pressures and geometries. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2007, 46, 823–833.

Szabolcs

Armando

C. O.

Numerical assessment of steam ejector efficiencies using CFD. Int. J. Refrig., 2009, 32, 1203–1211.

Huang

S. H.

S. L.

Effect of vapor condensation on hot steam ejector system of supersonic wind tunnel. J. Propuls. Technol., 2005, 26, 471–476.

Wagner

Cooper

J. R.

The IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the thermodynamic properties of water and steam. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power, 2000, 122, 150–182.

10.

Liang

Numerical study on condensing flow in low pressure cylinder of a 300MW steam turbine. In Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010, 2010, Glasgow, Scotland, Power for Land, Sea and Air, Scottish Exhibition & Conference Centre) 14–18. June 2010, p. 7.

11.

Moses

C. A.

Stein

G. D.

On the growth of steam droplets formed in a laval nozzle using both static and light scattering measurements. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1978, 100, 311–323.

12.

Pietrowicz, S. and Kasperski, J. The thermo-flow processes proceeding during the two-phase flow in supersonic ejector applied in low power solar air conditioning systems, 22nd International Congress of Refrigeration, Beijing, 2007, pp. 1–9.

13.

Valerio

George

Numerical study of stress-transport turbulence models: Implementation and validation issues. Comput. Fluids, 2007, 36, 1373–1383.

14.

15.

Moore M. J. and Walters P. T. Predicting the fog drop size in wet steam turbines, Institute of Mechanical Engineers (UK), Wet Steam 4 Conf. University of Warwick, 1973 paper C37/73, 1973.

16.

Yang

Y. S.

Shens

S. Q.

Numerical simulation on non-equilibrium spontaneous condensation in supersonic steam flow. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 2009, 36, 902–907.

17.

Kermani

M. J.

Gerber

A. G.

A general formula for the evaluation of thermodynamic and aerodynamic losses in nucleating steam flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2003, 46, 3265–3278.