Uncertainty in atmospheric winds represents one of the primary sources of landing error in airdrop systems. In this work, a ground-based LIDAR system samples the wind field at discrete points above the target and transmits real-time data to approaching autonomous airdrop systems. In simulation and experimentation, the inclusion of a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) system showed a maximum of 40% improvement over unaided autonomous airdrop systems. Wind information nearest ground level has the largest impact on improving accuracy.
Ewing E, Bixby H and Knacke T. Recovery systems design guide. CA: Tech. Rep. Irving Industries Inc., 1978.
2.
CaliseAJPrestonD. Swarming/flocking and collision avoidance for mass airdrop of autonomous guided parafoils. J Guid Control Dyn2008; 31: 1123–1132.
3.
Carter D, George S, Hattis P, et al. Autonomous large parafoil guidance, navigation, and control system design status. AIAA Paper 2007; 2514.
4.
CarterDGeorgeSHattisP. Autonomous guidance, navigation, and control of large parafoils. AIAA Paper2005; 1643: 23–26.
5.
CarterDSinghLWholeyL. Band-limited guidance and control of large parafoils. AIAA Paper2009. 2981.
6.
Kaminer II and Yakimenko OA. Development of control algorithm for the autonomous gliding delivery system. In: 17th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Paper Number AIAA 2003-2116, Monterey, CA, 19–22 May 2003. Defense Technical Information Center.
7.
Murray JE, Sim AG, Neufeld DC, et al. Further development and flight test of an autonomous precision landing system using a parafoil. Vol. 4599. NASA Technical Memorandum 4599, Dryden Flight Research Facility, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program, 1994.
8.
Slegers NJ and Yakimenko OA. Optimal control for terminal guidance of autonomous parafoils. In: 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Paper Number AIAA 2009-2958, Seattle, WA, 4–7 May 2009. Defense Technical Information Center.
9.
Calise A and Preston D. Design of a stability augmentation system for airdrop of autonomous guided parafoils. AIAA Paper 2006; 6776.
10.
WardMCostelloMSlegersN. On the benefits of in-flight system identification for autonomous airdrop systems. J Guid Control Dyn2010; 33: 1313–1326.
11.
WardMCostelloMSlegersN. Specialized system identification for parafoil and payload systems. J Guid Control Dyn2012; 35: 588–597.
12.
Yakimenko OA, Slegers NJ and Tiaden RA. Development and testing of the miniature aerial delivery system snowflake. In: 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Paper Number AIAA 2009-2980, Seattle, WA, 4–7 May 2009. Defense Technical Information Center.
13.
MastersFJVickeryPJBaconP. Toward objective, standardized intensity estimates from surface wind speed observations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc2010; 91: 1665–1681.
14.
Antoniou I, Courtney MS, Ejsing Jørgensen H, et al. Remote sensing the wind using lidars and sodars. In: Conference proceedings (online) Brussels. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), 2007.
15.
KrishnamurthyRCalhounRBillingsB. Wind turbulence estimates in a valley by coherent Doppler Lidar. Meteorol Appl2011; 18: 361–371.
16.
Milton HuffakerRHardestyR. Remote sensing of atmospheric wind velocities using solid-state and co 2 coherent laser systems. Proc IEEE1996; 84: 181–204.
17.
Herrmann TA, Ward MB, Costello M, et al. Utilizing ground-based LIDAR for autonomous airdrop, ser. In: AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems (ADS) Conference, Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences, Paper Number 2013-1387, Daytona beach, FL, 2013. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
18.
Goodrick TF and Murphy A. Analysis of various automatic homing techniques for gliding airdrop systems with comparative performance in adverse winds. In: Fourth aerodynamic deceleration systems conference, Paper Number 1973-462, Palm Springs, CA, 1973. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
19.
Jann T. Advanced features for autonomous parafoil guidance, navigation and control, ser. In: 18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences, Paper Number 2005-1642, Munich, Germany. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
20.
DubinsLE. On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math1957; 79: 497–516.
21.
Ward M. Adaptive glide slope control for parafoil and payload aircraft. Dissertation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012.
22.
SlegersNBeyerECostelloM. Use of variable incidence angle for glide slope control of autonomous parafoils. J Guid Control Dyn2008; 31: 585–596.
23.
Military Standard, Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft, Mil-std-1797a ed., 1990.
24.
BrownGJ. Parafoil steady turn response to control input. AIAA Paper1993; 1241: 10–13.
