Train components often act as Substitute Guidance Mechanisms (SGMs), providing essential passive safety protection in derailment accidents. Although the train cowcatcher is obviously one of SGMs, its passive protection mechanisms and safety performance are poorly understood. This study investigates the post-derailment passive safety performance of train cowcatchers and introduces a novel guide-limiting device (NGLD), featuring a guide-limiting plate, to enhance post-derailment protection. The individual and combined effectiveness of the cowcatcher and NGLD in controlling vertical and lateral movements of derailed trains was evaluated through nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA). The results demonstrate that the combined reduces lateral deviation and vertical displacement by 11%-37%. Furthermore, post-derailment trains were constrained within 11.8 m of the track centerline. Notably, the installation position of the NGLD is critical, as abnormal position can increase lateral deviation. In conclusion, the train cowcatcher serves as an important SGM, while the NGLD enhances passive safety by reducing potential damage and improving train stability in derailment scenarios.
CaoYAnYSUSSuS, et al.A statistical study of railway safety in China and Japan 1990–2020. Accid Anal Prev2022; 175: 106764.
2.
EvansAW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: an update to 2019. Accid Anal Prev2021; 158: 106182.
3.
BrabieDAnderssonE. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44(SUPPL. 1): 652–662.
4.
HanH-SKooJ-S. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions. Veh Syst Dyn2003; 40(6): 435–450.
5.
RhylaneHAjdourM. Dynamic analysis of railway track response subjected to train moving loads using finite element simulation. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol2024; 11(2): 650–674.
6.
TangZHuYPengZ, et al.A PCM-Based train post-derailment dynamics model and its application. Veh Syst Dyn2024; 63: 1543–1567.
7.
BaeH-UMoonJLimS-J, et al.Full-scale train derailment testing and analysis of post-derailment behavior of casting bogie. Appl Sci2019; 10(1): 59.
8.
KyriakidisMHirschRMajumdarA. Metro railway safety: an analysis of accident precursors. Saf Sci2012; 50(7): 1535–1548.
9.
EbrahimiHSattariFLefsrudL, et al.Analysis of train derailments and collisions to identify leading causes of loss incidents in rail transport of dangerous goods in Canada. J Loss Prev Process Ind2021; 72: 104517.
10.
ZhouJ-LLeiY. Paths between latent and active errors: analysis of 407 railway accidents/incidents’ causes in China. Saf Sci2018; 110: 47–58.
11.
ForsbergRBjöRNSTIGU. One hundred years of railway disasters and recent trends. Prehospital Disaster Med2011; 26(5): 367–373.
12.
ZhuZZhouGYZhengWQ, et al.Running safety assessment method of trains under seismic conditions based on the derailment risk domain. Railw Eng Sci2024; 32(4): 499–517.
13.
TuzikJ. Using twin simualtions of automated in-train & vehicle/track dynamics to reduce derailment risk. Railway Track & Stucture2024; 120(10): 8–12.
14.
TangZHuYQuZ. Enhancing nonlinear dynamics analysis of railway vehicles with artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art review. Nonlinear Dyn2024; 112(17): 14687–14717.
15.
ZhaiGSpencerBFYanJ, et al.Coupled data/physics-driven framework for accurate and efficient structural response simulation. Eng Struct2025; 327: 119636.
16.
ZhaiGXuYSpencerBF. Bidirectional graphics-based digital twin framework for quantifying seismic damage of structures using deep learning networks. Struct Health Monit2025; 24(1): 86–110.
17.
WilsonNFriesRWitteM, et al.Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests: a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods. Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49(7): 1113–1157.
18.
FrankeMReddyCDanijela RistićDD, et al.Towards holistic autonomous obstacle detection in railways by complementing of on-board vision with UAV-Based object localization 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 7012–7019.
19.
GaoG-JZhuoT-YGuanW-Y. Recent research development of energy-absorption structure and application for railway vehicles. J Cent South Univ2020; 27(4): 1012–1038.
20.
AsanumaKSogabeMWatanabeT, et al.Development of ballasted ladder track equipped with a vehicle guide device. QR of RTRI2009; 50(4): 233–240.
21.
XuPXiaoXYaoS. A review of train passenger safety-Inspiration from passive safety passenger protection technology of automobile. Transportation Safety and Environment2021; 4(1): tdab032.
22.
QinYCaoZSunY, et al.Research on active safety methodologies for intelligent railway systems. Engineering2023; 27(8): 266–279.
23.
TangZHuYWangS, et al.Train post-derailment behaviours and containment methods: a review. Railw Eng Sci2024; 32(1): 59–80.
24.
BrabieDAnderssonE. An overview of some high-speed train derailments: means of minimizing consequences based on empirical observations. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2008; 222(4): 441–463.
25.
FerreñODCasadoJACarrascalIA, et al.Experimental and finite element fatigue assessment of the spring clip of the SKL-1 railway fastening system. Eng Struct2019; 188: 553–563.
26.
LiZLiJLiC, et al.Study on the mechanism of mechanical properties deterioration of brake disc materials of high-speed train. Eng Fail Anal2024; 156: 107816.
27.
SongIHKimJWKooJS, et al.Modeling and simulation of collision-causing derailment to design the derailment containment provision using a simplified vehicle model. Appl Sci2019; 10(1): 118.
28.
GuoLWangKLinJ, et al.Study of the post-derailment safety measures on low-speed derailment tests. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54(7): 943–962.
29.
BrabieDAnderssonE. Post-derailment dynamic simulation of rail vehicles -methodology and applications. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46(sup1): 289–300.
30.
WuXChiMGaoH, et al.The study of post-derailment measures to limit the extent of a derailment. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2016; 230(1): 64–76.
31.
WuXChiMGaoH. The study of post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicle based on runing test. Eng Fail Anal2014; 44(6): 382–399.
32.
HamiltonBA. Report on the findings of: current practice and effectiveness of derailment containment provisions on high speed lines. HSL-Zuid Organisation, 2004.
33.
SongIHKooJ-SShimJ-S, et al.Theoretical prediction of impact force acting on derailment containment provisions (DCPs). Appl Sci2023; 13(6): 3899.
34.
SongIHKimJWKooJS, et al.Simplified vehicle modeling technique for design of derailment containment provisions (DCP). J Korean Soc Railw2019; 22(7): 527–537.
35.
KajitaniYKatoHAsanoK. Development of an L-Shaped guide to prevent deviation from rails. Jr East Technical Review2010; 15: 53–56.
36.
HouSHuoXZhangX, et al.Study on dynamic characteristics and structural strength of lateral limiting device for high-speed train under collision derailment accident. J Railw Sci Eng2021; 18(3): 588–595.
37.
SunamiHMorimuraTTerumichiY, et al.Model for analysis of bogie frame motion under derailment conditions based on full-scale running tests. Multibody Syst Dyn2012; 27(3): 321–349.
38.
GrobJHajdinN. Train derailment and its impact on structures. Struct Eng Int1993; 3(2): 88–94.
39.
GuoZLiuTXiaY, et al.Aerodynamic influence of the clearance under the cowcatcher of a high-speed train. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod2022; 220(7): 104844–104862.
40.
LiYLiYWangY, et al.Structural optimization–based fatigue durability analysis of electric multiple units cowcatcher. Adv Mech Eng2017; 9(8): 168781401772629.
41.
LiSYZhengZJYuJL. Mechanical analysis of a cowcatcher for a high-speed train in crashing. Appl Mech Mater2013; 437(1): 18–21.
42.
ChirwaECSearanckeEJHoyAJ, et al.Design of an efficient crashworthy lifeguard for current and future electric multiple unit bogies. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2001; 215(3): 217–230.
43.
ZhuXLuX-ZChengQ-L, et al.Simulation of the running attitude of a train after derailment. Int J Crashworthiness2020; 25(2): 213–219.
44.
FerreiraGMontenegroPAnderssonA, et al.Critical analysis of the current eurocode deck acceleration limit for evaluating running safety in ballastless railway bridges. Eng Struct2024; 312: 118127.
45.
RanXChenSHuX, et al.Digital twin modelling of heavy-haul train for longitudinal impulse simulation. Veh Syst Dyn2025; 26: 1–22.
46.
CaoLYangCZhangJ. Derailment behaviors of the train-ballasted track-subgrade system subjected to earthquake using shaking table. KSCE J Civ Eng2020; 24(10): 2949–2960.
