Development of a new recline mechanism in order to reduce the “whiplash” effect using a virtual model

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to design a mechanism mounted on the occupant’s seat to control the recline of the backseat in the case of rear-end collisions to reduce the effects of whiplash upon the occupant’s neck and head using a virtual model of an occupant and seat. The design of the system is modeled in SolidWorks and simulated in this software by using the Adams physics model included in SolidWorks. The system will function similarly to a real sled; it is composed of a car’s seat, a multibody occupant and a surface along which the seat may slide. This system will be validated by comparing two real sled tests and a seat normally functioning. Once validated, the mechanism is enabled to make simulations which are conducted to analyze the differences in kinematics of the occupant’s neck and the various key parameters such as head accelerations, contact forces and T1 vertebrae acceleration. The multibody occupant is composed of multiple bodies inter-connected with joints and it will simulate a real occupant. As for the evaluation of injury potential for the neck, the neck injury criteria (NIC) are calculated for the comparisons of the two situations: when the backseat has normal rigidity and when the recline mechanism is activated. It was observed that, by using this recline mechanism, the key parameters were reduced. This paper presents the new developed mechanism with the obtained parameter reductions.

Keywords

Occupant passive safety rear-end collision simulation virtual model whiplash

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gawande

Dasarkar

MA.

Review on whiplash protection system. Int Res J Eng Technol 2016; 3: 156–160.

Spitzer

WO.

Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining ‘whiplash’ and its management. Spine 1995; 20(Suppl. 8): 1S–73S.

Nygren

. Injuries to car occupants-some aspects of the interior safety of cars. A study of a five-year material from an insurance company. Acta Otolaryngol 1983; 95(Suppl. 395): 1–135.

Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury scale, 1990 revision. Des Plaines, IL: AAAM, 1990.

Jakobsson

Field analysis of AIS1 neck injuries in rear-end car impacts: injury reducing effect of the WHIPS seat. J Whiplash Related Disorders 2004; 3: 37–53.

Ono

Kanno

Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. Accid Anal Prev 1996; 28: 493–499.

van Kampen

. Available and (proper) adjustment of head restraints in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the 1993 international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 8–10 September 1993, pp.367–377.

Von Koch

Nygren

Tingvall

. Impairment pattern in passenger car crashes, a follow-up of injuries resulting in long term consequences. In: Proceedings of the 14th ESV conference, Munich, Germany, 1994, pp.776–781.

Morris

Thomas

. A study of soft tissue neck injuries in the UK. In: Proceedings international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Melbourne, Australia, 1996, pp.1412–1425. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

10.

Barnsley

Lord

Bogduk

Whiplash injury. Pain 1994; 58: 283–307.

11.

Alardhi

Alkhulaifi

Alrajhi

et al . Linear damping seat to reduce whiplash injury in rear-end collision. Global J Res Enng 2014; 14: 25–30.

12.

Whiplash Test Protocol. http://www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-explained/adult-occupant-protection/whiplash/ (accessed May 2017).

13.

Directive 74/408/EEC, with effect from 1 July 2004.

14.

Jakobsson

Lundell

Norin

et al . WHIPS–Volvo’s whiplash protection study. Accid Anal Prev 2000; 32: 307–319.

15.

Lundell

Jakobsson

Alfredsson

et al . The WHIPS seat-a car seat for improved protection against neck injuries in rear-end impacts. In: Proceedings of the 16th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV), Windsor, 31 May–4 June 1998, Paper No. 98-S7-O-08.

16.

Whiplash Question and Answers Page. http://www.chiro.org/LINKS/FULL/Neck_Injury_Q_A.shtml (accessed December 2016).

17.

Berg

Walz

Bürkle

et al . Implications of velocity change delta-v and energy equivalent speed EES for injury mechanism assessment in various collision configurations. International IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts.

18.

Kim

Kang

Optimum design of an A-pillar trim with rib structures for occupant head protection. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2001; 215: 1161–1169.

19.

Yang

Yun

Park

GJ.

Design of a pedestrian protection airbag system using experiments. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2016; 230: 1182–1195.

20.

Kang

Moon

Lim

et al . Observation and simulations of an impact on the automotive windshield using the time-dependent dynamic failure criterion. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2015; 229: 866–874.

21.

Boström

Svensson

Aldman

et al . A new neck injury criterion candidate-based on injury findings in the cervical spinal ganglia after experimental neck extension trauma. In Proceedings of the 1996 international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impact, Dublin, Ireland, 11–13 September 1996, pp.123–136.

22.

PC-Crash 10.2 manual.