In this paper, numerical simulations combining unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulation and the discrete phase model are used to study the application of countermeasure for snow accumulation in the regions of bogie cavities of a high-speed train. The influence of the cowcatcher heights and guide structure configurations on the flow features and snow accumulation was studied. The results of the study show that the cowcatcher with a downward elongation of 4% of the distance between the two axles decreases the snow accumulation in the first and the second bogie regions by about 56.6% and 13.6%, respectively. Furthermore, the guide structures have been found to significantly alter the velocity and pressure distribution in the second bogie region, resulting in a relatively large snow-accumulation reduction. The deflector is found to perform better in reducing snow accumulation when compared to the diversion slots. The cowcatcher, elongated in the downward direction, and the deflector proved to be a good countermeasure for snow accumulation around the bogies of high-speed trains operating in snowy weather conditions.
WangJBGaoGJZhangY, et al.Anti-snow performance of snow shields designed for brake calipers of a high-speed train. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 133: 121–140.
2.
WangJBZhangJXieF, et al.A study of snow accumulating on the bogie and the effects of deflectors on the de-icing performance in the bogie region of a high-speed train. Cold Regions Sci Technol2018; 148: 121–130.
3.
WangJBGaoGJLiuMY, et al.Numerical study of snow accumulation on the bogies of a high-speed train using URANS coupled with discrete phase model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018; 183: 295–314.
4.
WangJBZhangJZhangY, et al.Impact of rotation of wheels and bogie cavity shapes on snow accumulating on the bogies of high-speed trains. Cold Regions Sci Technol2019; 159: 58–70.
5.
Casa XDL, Paradot N and Allain E. A numerical modelling of the snow accumulation on a high-speed train. In: International conference in numerical and experimental aerodynamics of road vehicles and trains, France, 23–25 June 2014.
6.
KosinskiPHoffmannAC. An Eulerian–Lagrangian model for dense particle clouds. Computers and Fluids2017; 36: 714–723.
7.
Liu M Y, Gao G J and Wang J B. Study on Snow and Ice of Bogie based on STAR-CCM+. In: DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research: 2nd International Conference on Industrial Aerodynamics, Qingdao, China 2017, pp.572–579. DOI: 10.12783/dtetr/icia2017/15680.
8.
GiappinoSRocchiDSchitoP. Cross wind and rollover risk on lightweight railway vehicles. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2016; 153: 106–112.
9.
Wang J B, Gao G J, Zhang Y, et al. Numerical simulation of snow accumulation on a bogie of a high-speed train. In: DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research: 2nd International Conference on Industrial Aerodynamics, Qingdao, China 2017, pp.771–778. DOI: 10.12783/dtetr/icia2017/15701.
10.
XieFZhangJGaoGJ, et al.Study of snow accumulation on a high-speed train’s bogies based on the discrete phase model. J Appl Fluid Mech2017; 10: 1729–1745.
11.
WangJBZhangJZhangY, et al.Impact of bogie cavity shapes and operational environment on snow accumulating on the bogies of high-speed trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018; 176: 211–224.
12.
Fujii T, Kawashima K and Iikura S. Preventive measures against snow for high-speed train operation in Japan. In: Cold Regions Engineering: Cold Regions Impacts on Transportation and Infrastructure: 11th International Conference on Cold Regions Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska 2002, pp.448–459.
13.
ThomasJ. De-icing solution. Int Railw J2009; 49: 24–25.
14.
Bettez M. Winter technologies for high speed rail. Master's Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, 2011.
15.
DingSSTianAQDongTY, et al.Influence of inclined guiding plate on anti-snow performance of high-speed train bogie. J Central South Univ (Science and Technology)2016; 47: 1400–1405. In Chinese).
16.
GaoGJZhangYXieF, et al.Numerical study on the anti-snow performance of deflectors in the bogie region of a high-speed train using the discrete phase model. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 233: 141–159.
17.
CEN European Standard. EN 14067-4:2013. Railway applications -–aerodynamics Part4: requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics on open track, 2013.
18.
IncFluent. Fluent user's guide, New York: Author, 2011.
19.
ChenGLiXBLiuZ, et al.Dynamic analysis of the effect of nose length on train aerodynamic performance. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2019; 184: 198–208.
20.
NiuJQZhouDLiangXF. Numerical simulation of the effects of obstacle deflectors on the aerodynamic performance of stationary high-speed trains at two yaw angles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2018; 232: 913–927.
21.
NiuJQWangYMZhangL, et al.Numerical analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train with different train nose lengths. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2018; 127: 188–199.
22.
ZhangJLiJJTianHQ, et al.Impact of ground and wheel boundary conditions on numerical simulation of the high-speed train aerodynamic performance. J Fluids Struct2016; 61: 249–261.
23.
ZhangJWangJBWangQX, et al.A study of the influence of bogie cut outs' angles on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018; 175: 153–168.
24.
FlynnDHemidaHBakerC. On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2016; 156: 14–28.
25.
GuoZJLiuTHChenZW, et al.Comparative numerical analysis of the slipstream caused by single and double unit trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018; 172: 395–408.
26.
HemidaHBakerCGaoGJ. The calculation of train slipstreams using large-eddy simulation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2014; 228: 25–36.
27.
WangSBBurtonDHerbstA, et al.The effect of bogies on high-speed train slipstream and wake. J Fluids Struct2018; 83: 471–489.
28.
TominagaYOkazeTMochidaA. CFD modeling of snowdrift around a building: an overview of models and evaluation of a new approach. Build Environ2011; 46: 899–910.
29.
BeyersMWaechterB. Modeling transient snowdrift development around complex three-dimensional structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2008; 96: 1603–1615.
30.
ZhouXYKangLYGuM, et al.Numerical simulation and wind tunnel test for redistribution of snow on a flat roof. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2016; 153: 92–105.
