A method of collaborative simulation of the train collision process using a rigid motion model and a flexible collision model is proposed to solve the problem of the low computational efficiency of the finite element numerical simulation of the train collision process. This study investigated the collision response of a train derailment hitting a platform with different curve radii based on an accident in which a subway train derailed and hit a platform. Based on the results, a collision damage index is proposed to assess the relative degree of damage of train derailment collisions at different curve radii. The results reveal that within a certain radius of the curve (when the impact distance D exists), there is a positive correlation between the curve radius and the collision damage index, and when the curve radius exceeds a certain value (when the impact distance D doesn’t exist), the train and platform don’t collide.
ZhuTXiaoSNLeiC, et al.Rail vehicle crashworthiness based on collision energy management: an overview. Int J Rail Transp2021; 9: 101–131. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2020.1777908
2.
EvansAW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: an update to 2019. Accid Anal Prev2021; 158: 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106182
3.
LinCYSaatMRBarkanCPL. Quantitative causal analysis of mainline passenger train accidents in the United States. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2020; 234: 869–884. DOI: 10.1177/0954409719876128
4.
LingLGuanQHDhanasekarM, et al.Dynamic simulation of train-truck collision at level crossings. Veh Syst Dyn2017; 55: 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1240811
5.
YangCLiQXiaoSN, et al.On the overriding issue of train front end collision in rail vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn2018; 56: 506–528. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2017.1394472
6.
OfochebeSMOzoegwuCGEnibeSO. Performance evaluation of vehicle front structure in crash energy management using lumped mass spring system. Adv Modeli Simul Eng Sci2015; 2: 2.
7.
ZhouHCWangWBHechtM. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of a crashed city tram. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51: 1200–1215. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2013.790553
8.
ZhuTLiuSJXiaoSN, et al.Train collision dynamic model considering longitudinal and vertical coupling. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11: 9. DOI: 10.1177/1687814018823966
9.
XueXSchmidFSmithRA. Analysis of the structural characteristics of an intermediate rail vehicle and their effect on vehicle crash performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2007; 221: 339–352. DOI: 10.1243/09544097jrrt77
10.
AnghileriMCastellettiLMLPirolaM, et al.CIV class tram crashworthiness assessment. Int J Crashworthiness2008; 13: 425–435. DOI: 10.1080/13588260802049372
11.
ZhuTXiaoSNHuGZ, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of the structure of metro vehicles constructed from typical materials and the lumped parameter model of frontal impact. Transport2019; 34: 75–88. DOI: 10.3846/transport.2019.7552
12.
YaoSGZhuHFYanKB, et al.The derailment behaviour and mechanism of a subway train under frontal oblique collisions. Int J Crashworthiness2021; 26: 133–146. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1692506
13.
LuZJLiBHYangCX, et al.Numerical and experimental study on the design strategy of a new collapse zone structure for railway vehicles. Int J Crashworthiness2017; 22: 488–502. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1281080
14.
BaykasogluCSunbulogluEBozdagSE, et al.Railroad passenger car collision analysis and modifications for improved crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness2011; 16: 319–329. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.566475
15.
BaykasogluCMuganASunbulogluE, et al.Rollover crashworthiness analysis of a railroad passenger car. Int J Crashworthiness2013; 18: 492–501. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2013.809645
16.
ZhangJZhuTYangB, et al.Influence of wheelset rotational motion on train collision response and wheelset lift mechanism. Int J Rail Transp2022: 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2022.2083710
17.
LuG. Collision behaviour of crashworthy vehicles in rakes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit1999; 213: 143–160. DOI: 10.1243/0954409991531100
18.
LuG. Energy absorption requirement for crashworthy vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2002; 216: 31–39. DOI: 10.1243/0954409021531665
19.
LewisJHRasaiahWGScholesA. Validation of measures to improve rail vehicle crashworthiness. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit1996; 210: 73–85. DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1996_210_330_02
20.
MeranAPBaykasogluCMuganA, et al.Development of a design for a crash energy management system for use in a railway passenger car. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2016; 230: 206–219. DOI: 10.1177/0954409714533321
21.
SuttonA. The development of rail vehicle crashworthiness. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2002; 216: 97–108. DOI: 10.1243/09544090260082335
22.
TyrellDJacobsenKMartinezE, et al.Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: structural results. In: ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2006. Proceedings of IMECE2006, pp. 35–44.
23.
WeiLZhangLLTongX, et al.Crashworthiness study of a subway vehicle collision accident based on finite-element methods. Int J Crashworthiness2021; 26: 159–170. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1699742
24.
KirkpatrickSWSchroederMSimonsJW. Evaluation of passenger rail vehicle crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness2001; 6: 95–106. DOI: 10.1533/cras.2001.0165
25.
MayvilleRRancatoreRTegelerL. Investigation and simulation of lateral buckling in trainsASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference Dallas, Tx. In:Proceedings of the 1999 asme/ieee joint railroad conference, New York, NY, Apr 13–15 1999, Amer Soc Mechanical Engineers, pp. 88–93.
BaeHUYunKMLimNH. Containment capacity and estimation of crashworthiness of derailment containment walls against high-speed trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F-J Rail Rapid Transit2018; 232: 680–696. DOI: 10.1177/0954409716684663
28.
ZhangJZhuTWangX, et al.Comprehensive evaluation model for one-dimensional crash energy management of trains. J Southwest Jiaotong University2021; 56: 1329–1336.
