By considering the effect of the constraints of the rails on the subgrade section on both sides of a bridge, analytical expressions are derived to study the mapping relationship between the rail deformation and changes in the condition of the supporting beam(s), based on the principle of minimum potential energy. Rail deformations in a slab track–bridge system induced by the subsidence of piers and beam faults are investigated in detail. Results are compared with the finite element calculations to assess the main factors that influence rail deformation. The results show that the rail deformation curves under different working conditions (single or multiple pier subsidence and beam faults) determined using the analytical model fit well with those from the finite element models. With increasing subsidence of piers, the rail deformed more significantly in the subsidence zone. Moreover, both the maximum downward and upward deformations of the rail changed linearly with the subsidence of piers. Use of fasteners or a mortar layer with greater vertical stiffness caused the rail to become more irregular.
GouHLongHBaoY, et al.Dynamic behavior of hybrid framed arch railway bridge under moving trains. Struct Infrastruct Eng2019; 15: 1015–1024.
2.
YanWJZhaoMYSunQ. Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health monitoring: fundamentals, approaches, and applications. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 117: 453–482.
3.
WangSJXuZDLiS. The influence and difference of alignment change of simply supported girder bridge on single and double line operation of light-rail train (in Chinese). J Cent South Univ Technol2017; 48: 1674–1681.
4.
GouH. Effect of bridge lateral deformation on track geometry of high-speed railway. Steel Compos Struct2018; 29: 219–229.
5.
GouHY. Effect of long-term bridge deformations on safe operation of high-speed railway and vibration of vehicle-bridge coupled system. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2019; 19: 1950111.
6.
Shi XY. Influence of uneven settlement of bridge pier and creep camber of bridge girder on the running safety for high-speed railway (in Chinese). Master Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China, 2018.
7.
Lutzmauer. An interactive Track-Train dynamic model for calculation of track error growth. Vehicle Syst Dyn2007; 24: 209–221.
8.
LingLXiaoXBXiongJY, et al.Erratum to: A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A2015; 15: 964–983.
9.
YauJD. Response of a train moving on multi-span railway bridges undergoing ground settlement. Eng Struct2009; 31: 2115–2122.
10.
YauJD. Response of a maglev vehicle moving on a series of guideways with differential settlement. J Sound Vibr2009; 324: 816–831.
11.
JuSH. 3D analysis of high-speed trains moving on bridges with foundation settlements. Arch Appl Mech2013; 83: 281–291.
12.
ChenZWSunYZhaiWM. Mapping relationship between pier settlement and rail deformation of high-speed railways-part(II): The longitudinal-connected-slab ballastless track system. Sci China Technol Sci2014; 44: 778–785.
13.
ChenZWSunYZhaiWM. Mapping relationship between pier settlement and rail deformation of high-speed railways-part(I): the unit slab track system. Sci China Technol Sci2014; 44: 770–777.
14.
ChenZZhaiWTianG. Study on the safe value of multi-pier settlement for simply supported girder bridges in high-speed railways. Struct Infrastruct E2018; 14: 400–410.
15.
Xiong J, Yu H and Gao M. Effect of pier and abutment non-uniform settlement on train running behavior. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006, p.334.
16.
DuJSLiuHB. Effect of pier vertical deformations on deflections of main girders for high pier and long-span continuous rigid-frame bridges. Adv Mater Res2011; 167: 1436–1439.
17.
ZhenWXXinLLXianXD, et al.Numerical analysis of bridge expansion-induced rail deformation of ballast truck. Appl Mech Mater2014; 580–583: 3208–3214.
18.
XuQYZhouXLZengZP. Mechanics model of additional longitudinal force transmission between bridges and continuously welded rails with small resistance fasteners. J Cent South Univ Technol2004; 11: 336–339.
19.
XuQYChenXFLiSD. Research on longitudinal additional force of seamless line on high-speed railway bridge (in Chinese). China Railw Sci2006; 27: 8–12.
20.
YanBDaiGL. Analysis of beam-rail interaction in high speed railway considering loading history (in Chinese). J China Railw Soc2014; 36: 75–80.
21.
KuoSRYauJD. A fast and accurate step-by-step solution procedure for direct integration. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2011; 11: 473–493.
22.
YangYBYauJD. An iterative interacting method for dynamic analysis of the Maglev train–guideway/foundation-soil system. Eng Struct2011; 33: 1013–1024.
23.
GongXLiZ. Bridge pier settlement prediction in high-speed railway via autoregressive model based on robust weighted total least-squares. Surv Rev2018; 50: 147–154.
24.
TaoWHanWFeiY, et al.Wind-vehicle-bridge coupled vibration analysis based on random traffic flow simulation. J Traffic Transport Eng2014; 1: 293–308.
25.
JiangLZhangYFengY. Dynamic response analysis of a simply supported double-beam system under successive moving loads. Appl Sci Basel2019; 9: 1–14.
26.
JiangLYuJZhouW, et al.Analysis of flexural natural vibrations of thin-walled box beams using higher order beam theory. Struct Des Tall Spec2019; 28: 1–15.
27.
ZhouWJiangLHuangZ, et al.Flexural natural vibration characteristics of composite beam considering shear deformation and interface slip. Steel Compos Struct2016; 20: 1023–1042.
28.
GallouMFrostMEl-HamalawiA, et al.Assessing the deflection behaviour of mechanical and insulated rail joints using finite element analysis. P I Mech Eng F J Rai2018; 232: 2290–2308.
29.
SaeedATXiangZ. Dynamic analysis of coupling vehicle-bridge system using finite prism method. Int J Eng Technol2018; 9: 359–365.
30.
NaserMZHawilehRA. Predicting the response of continuous RC deep beams under varying levels of differential settlement. Front Struct Civ Eng2018; 13: 686–700.
31.
WangYJWeiQCYauJD. Interaction response of train loads moving over a two-span continuous beam. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2013; 13: 299–308.
32.
ZhangYLiaoCChenJ, et al.Numerical analysis of interaction between seabed and mono-pile subjected to dynamic wave loadings considering the pile rocking effect. Ocean Eng2018; 155(1): 73–188.
JiangLZFengYLZhouWB. Analysis on natural vibration characteristics of steel-concrete composite truss beam. Steel Compos Struct2018; 26: 79–87.
35.
FengYLJiangLZZhouWB. Lateral-torsional buckling of box beam with corrugated steel webs. J Cent South Univ2019; 26: 1946–1957.
36.
GouHHeYZhouW, et al.Experimental and numerical investigations of the dynamic responses of an asymmetrical arch railway bridge. P I Mech Eng F J Rai2018; 232: 2309–2323.
37.
HeXHGaiYBWuT. Simulation of train-bridge interaction under wind loads: a rigid-flexible coupling approach. Int J Rail Transport2018; 6: 163–182.
38.
YauJD. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations. J Sound Vibr2009; 325: 907–922.
39.
Al ShaerADuhamelDSabK, et al.Experimental settlement and dynamic behavior of a portion of ballasted railway track under high speed trains. J Sound Vibr2008; 316: 211–233.
40.
YangYBYauJD. Resonance of high-speed trains moving over a series of simple or continuous beams with non-ballasted tracks. Eng Struct2017; 143: 295–305.
41.
WangWTuCLuoR. Numerical simulation of compaction parameters for sand-filled embankment using large thickness sand filling technique in Jianghan plain district. Front Struct Civ Eng2018; 12: 1–9.
42.
ChenZWZhaiWMCaiCB. Safety threshold of high-speed railway pier settlement based on train-track-bridge dynamic interaction. Sci China Technol Sci2015; 58: 202–210.
43.
GouHLongHBaoY, et al.Stress distributions in girder-arch-pier connections of long-span continuous rigid frame arch railway bridges. J Bridge Eng2018; 23: 4018039.
