Starting from the knowledge of flush air data-sensing systems developed in the aerospace field, a system able to evaluate the crosswind velocity (absolute and angle) from pressure measurements performed on a train’s surface has been studied and developed. The crosswind evaluation algorithm is based on a neural network and is created and tested using pressure measurements carried out during wind tunnel tests on a scale-model of a railway vehicle. The number and positions of pressure taps on the surface of the train’s leading car are optimized, in terms of the sensitivity and robustness of the measurement system. The system is calibrated and validated using steady and quasi-steady wind tunnel tests on a scale model of a train. The designed neural network gives a maximum error of about 1 m/s for the modulus and 1° for the angle of the relative velocity.
TSI HS RST, 2008. Technical specification for interoperability of the trans-European high speed rail system.
2.
CheliFCorradiRTomasiniG. Cross wind action on rail vehicles: a methodology for the estimation of the characteristic wind curves. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn2012; 104–106: 248–255.
3.
BakerCCheliFOrellanoA. Cross-wind effects on road and rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2009; 47(8): 983–1022.
4.
TomasiniGCheliF. Admittance function to evaluate aerodynamic loads on vehicles: experimental data and numerical model. J Fluids Struct2013; 38: 92–106.
5.
BakerCJ. The simulation of unsteady aerodynamic cross wind forces on trains. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn2010; 98: 88–99.
6.
BarcalaMAMeseguerJ. An experimental study of the influence of parapets on the aerodynamic loads under cross wind on a two-dimensional model of a railway vehicle on a bridge. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2007; 221(4): 487–494.
7.
ImaiTFujiiTTanemotoK. New train regulation method based on wind direction and velocity of natural wind against strong winds. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn2002; 90: 1601–1610.
8.
CleonL-MJourdainA. Protection of line LN5 against cross winds. The fifth world congress on railway research, Köln, Germany, 25–29 November 2001.
9.
HeineChMöllerMDrillerJTielkesTh. A probabilistic approach to safeguard cross wind safety of passenger railway operation in Germany: the new DB Guideline. The eighth world congress on railway research, COEX: South Korea, 18–22 May 2008.
10.
FredaASolariG. A pilot study of the wind speed along the Rome-Naples HS/HC railway line. Part 2-probabilistic analyses and methodology assessment. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn2010; 98: 404–416.
11.
SterlingMQuinnADBakerCJ. A comparison of different methods to evaluate the wind induced forces on a high sided lorry. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn2010; 98(1): 10–20.
12.
BraghinFCheliFCorradiE. Active anti-rollover system for heavy-duty road vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46(1): 653–668.
13.
Cary JP and Keener ER. Flight evaluation of the X-15 ball-nose flow-direction sensor as an air data system. NASA report TN D-2923, 1965. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, D. C. Available at: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650018344.pdf.
14.
Wolowicz CH and Gosett TD. Operational and performance characteristics of the X-15 spherical hypersonic flow direction sensor. NASA report TN D-3076, 1965. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, D. C. Available at: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19660001314.pdf.
Larson TJ, Whitmore SA, Ehernberger LJ, et al. Qualitative evaluation of a flush air data system at transonic speeds and high angles of attack. NASA report TP-2716, 1987. NASA. Available at: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88073main_H-1277.pdf.
Rohloff T. Development and evaluation of neural network flush air data sensing systems. PhD Thesis, University of California, USA, 1998.
20.
CrowtherWJLamontPJ. A neural network approach to the calibration of a flush air data system. Aeronaut J2001; 105: 85–95.
21.
BrownENFrieheCALenschowDH. The use of pressure fluctuations on the nose of an aircraft for measuring air motion. J Clim Appl Meteorol1983; 22: 171–180.
22.
RediniotisOVijayagopalR. Miniature multihole pressure probes and their neural network based calibration. AIAA J1999; 37: 666–674.
23.
RediniotisOChrysanthakopoulosG. Application of neural networks and fuzzy logic to the calibration of the seven-hole probe. Trans ASME: J Fluid Engng1998; 120: 95–101.
24.
EN 14067-6: 2010. Railway applications – aerodynamics – part 6: requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment.
25.
Demuth H, Beale M and Hagan M. Neural network toolbox TM 6. Matlab® user’s guide. 2009, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
