The machining process of Haynes 230 superalloy is challenging due to its high strength and thermal resistance, leading to tool wear and instability. This research presents a hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) framework for managing tool life through machine learning (ML), multiobjective optimization, and large language models (LLMs). Experiments captured data on vibration, surface roughness (Ra), cutting forces, and temperature, revealing that vibration over 65 Hz and surface roughness (Ra) exceeding 1.4 µm indicate rapid tool wear. Various regression and classification models provided accurate estimates of tool life and wear state. A Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) approach identified optimal machining conditions to improve tool longevity while minimizing vibration and surface roughness. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis underscored the effects of these variables, and integration with the Falcon LLM translated finding Bidirectional Mean Absolute Error (Bi-long short-term memory)—AI into operator-friendly recommendations. This framework supports predictive maintenance and can be incorporated into robotic machining cells and digital twin environments, promoting intelligent manufacturing systems that enhance productivity and resilience in aerospace and power generation industries.
WangKDuDLiuG, et al.A study on the additive manufacturing of a high chromium nickel-based superalloy by extreme high-speed laser metal deposition. Opt Laser Technol2021; 133: 106504.
2.
TinSPollockTM. Nickel-based superalloys for blade application: production, performance and application. Encycl Aerosp Eng2010; 5: 1–10.
3.
MostafaeiAGhiaasiaanRHoI-T, et al.Additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys: a state-of-the-art review on process-structure-defect-property relationship. Prog Mater Sci2023; 136: 101108.
4.
AdamBMTuckerJDTewksburyG. Comparative study of the hot processing behavior in advanced Ni-based superalloys for use in A-USC applications. J Alloys Compd2020; 818: 152907.
5.
PimenovDYda SilvaLRRMachadoAR, et al.A comprehensive review of machinability of difficult-to-machine alloys with advanced lubricating and cooling techniques. Tribol Int2024; 196: 109677.
6.
SarıkayaMGuptaMKTomazI, et al.A state-of-the-art review on tool wear and surface integrity characteristics in machining of superalloys. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2021; 35: 624–658.
7.
BiswasSPaulARDharAR, et al.Multi-material modeling for wire electro-discharge machining of Ni-based superalloys using hybrid neural network and stochastic optimization techniques. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2023; 41: 350–364.
8.
LiKZhanJWangY, et al.Application of data-driven methods for laser powder bed fusion of Ni-based superalloys: a review. J Manuf Process2025; 133: 285–321.
9.
TamuraROsadaTMinagawaK, et al.Machine learning-driven optimization in powder manufacturing of Ni-Co based superalloy. Mater Des2021; 198: 109290.
10.
LinGShiHLiuX, et al.Tool wear on machining of difficult-to-machine materials: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 134: 989–1014.
11.
KangRMaHWangZ, et al.Effect of tool wear on machining quality in milling Cf/SiC composites with PCD tool. J Manuf Process2023; 105: 370–385.
12.
SchefferCKratzHHeynsPS, et al.Development of a tool wear-monitoring system for hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2003; 43: 973–985.
13.
LimGH. Tool-wear monitoring in machine turning. J Mater Process Technol1995; 51: 25–36.
14.
LiangJGaoHLiD, et al.Study on milling tool wear morphology and mechanism during machining superalloy GH4169 with PVD-TiAlN coated carbide tool. Tribol Int2023; 182: 108298.
15.
LindvallRLenrickFPerssonH, et al.Performance and wear mechanisms of PCD and pcBN cutting tools during machining titanium alloy Ti6Al4 V. Wear2020; 454–455: 203329.
16.
BjerkeAHrechukALenrickF, et al.Thermodynamic modeling framework for prediction of tool wear and tool protection phenomena in machining. Wear2021; 484–485: 203991.
17.
MishraDPattipatiKRBollasGM. Gaussian mixture model for tool condition monitoring. J Manuf Process2024; 131: 1001–1013.
18.
CaiWZhangWHuX, et al.A hybrid information model based on long short-term memory network for tool condition monitoring. J Intell Manuf2020; 31: 1497–1510.
19.
MóriczLViharosZJNémethA, et al.Off-line geometrical and microscopic & on-line vibration based cutting tool wear analysis for micro-milling of ceramics. Measurement (Mahwah N J)2020; 163: 108025.
20.
PimenovDYBustilloAWojciechowskiS, et al.Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: analysis and critical review. J Intell Manuf2023; 34: 2079–2121.
21.
ZhangBLiuXYueC, et al.Meta-learning-based approach for tool condition monitoring in multi-condition small sample scenarios. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 216: 111444.
22.
SerinGSenerBOzbayogluAM, et al.Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 109: 953–974.
23.
DanishMGuptaMKIrfanSA, et al.Machine learning models for prediction and classification of tool wear in sustainable milling of additively manufactured 316 stainless steel. Results Eng2024; 22: 102015.
LiWZhangL-CWuC-H, et al.A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools. Adv Manuf2024; 12: 6–18.
26.
LiXLiuXYueC, et al.Data-model linkage prediction of tool remaining useful life based on deep feature fusion and Wiener process. J Manuf Syst2024; 73: 19–38.
27.
BagriSManwarAVargheseA, et al.Tool wear and remaining useful life prediction in micro-milling along complex tool paths using neural networks. J Manuf Process2021; 71: 679–698.
28.
NiuMLiuKWangY. A semi-supervised learning method combining tool wear laws for machining tool wear states monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process2025; 224: 112032.
29.
MershaMLamKWoodJ, et al.Explainable artificial intelligence: a survey of needs, techniques, applications, and future direction. Neurocomputing2024; 599: 128111.
30.
SaranyaASubhashiniR. A systematic review of explainable artificial intelligence models and applications: recent developments and future trends. Decis Anal J2023; 7: 100230.
31.
YangQMishraDAwasthiU, et al.Tool wear and remaining useful life estimation in precision machining using interacting multiple model. J Manuf Syst2024; 74: 367–386.
32.
GavinaCGHemalathaKLRanganathKJ, et al.Tool health monitoring in lathe turning process by artificial intelligence techniques—a review. Concurr Eng2024; 33: 1063293X241307456.
33.
AllenovDGBorisovnaKDGhorbaniS, et al.Simultaneous effects of cutting depth and tool overhang on the vibration behavior of cutting tool and high-cycle fatigue behavior of product: experimental research on the turning machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 122: 2361–2378.
34.
AbainiaSOuelaaN. Predicting the dynamic behaviour of the turning tool vibrations using an experimental measurement, numerical simulation and analytical modelling for comparative study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 115: 2533–2552.
35.
AmbhoreNKambleDAgrawalD. Experimental investigation of induced tool vibration in turning of hardened AISI52100 steel. J Vib Eng Technol2022; 10: 1679–1689.
36.
KamM. Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on machinability, hardness and microstructure in dry turning process of tempered steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2021; 235: 927–936.
37.
NouiouaMBouhalaisML. Vibration-based tool wear monitoring using artificial neural networks fed by spectral centroid indicator and RMS of CEEMDAN modes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 115: 3149–3161.
38.
BahadorADuCNgHP, et al.Cost-effective classification of tool wear with transfer learning based on tool vibration for hard turning processes. Measurement (Mahwah N J)2022; 201: 111701.
39.
HanDYuJTangD. An HDP-HMM based approach for tool wear estimation and tool life prediction. Qual Eng2021; 33: 208–220.
40.
GavinaCGHemalathaKLRanganathKJ, et al.A smart manufacturing framework for tool wear analysis and RUL estimation using multimodal deep learning. Concurr Eng2025: 2: 1063293X25140641.
41.
AbdeltawabAXiZlongjiaZ. Tool wear classification based on maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform and hybrid deep learning model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 130: 2381–2406.
42.
MadhesanPK. Optimization of process parameters in turning of magnesium AZ91D alloy for better surface finish using genetic algorithm. Acta Innov2022; 43: 54–62. DOI: 10.32933/ActaInnovations.43.5
43.
ZhangXWangSLiW, et al.Heterogeneous sensors-based feature optimisation and deep learning for tool wear prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 114: 2651–2675.
44.
Malghan RLMCKRShettigarAK, et al.Application of back propagation algorithms in neural network based identification responses of AISI 316 face milling cryogenic machining technique. Aust J Mech Eng2022; 20: 698–705.
45.
PatelVDGandhiAH. Analysis and modeling of surface roughness based on cutting parameters and tool nose radius in turning of AISI D2 steel using CBN tool. Measurement (Mahwah N J)2019; 138: 34–38.
46.
SharmaVSinghJPRamanR, et al.Machine learning approach for prediction analysis of aluminium alloy on the surface roughness using CO2 laser machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2024; 240: 09544089241231093.
47.
AraghizadAEPashmforoushFTehranizadehF, et al.Improving milling force predictions: a hybrid approach integrating physics-based simulation and machine learning for remarkable accuracy across diverse unseen materials and tool types. J Manuf Process2024; 114: 92–107.
48.
KumarVDubeyVSharmaAK. Comparative analysis of different machine learning algorithms in prediction of cutting force using hybrid nanofluid enriched cutting fluid in turning operation. Mater Today Proc2023; 72.
49.
SharmaVMisraJPSinghalS. Process modeling and optimization of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-7Nb during WEDM using regression and ANN. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2023; 239: 09544089231215227. DOI: 10.1177/09544089231215227
50.
RanganathKJShivananda NayakaH. Optimization of turning nose radius for Haynes 230: a hybrid RSM and deep learning approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2025: 09544089251351179.
51.
RazaMJahangirZRiazMB, et al.Industrial applications of large language models. Sci Rep2025; 15: 13755.
52.
PakzadSSGhalehnoviMGanjifarA. A comprehensive comparison of various machine learning algorithms used for predicting the splitting tensile strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 20: e03092.
53.
WongT-T. Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recognit2015; 48: 2839–2846.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
