Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Experimental investigation on the effect of geometrical configuration of suction and discharge tube across the sub-units of propane-based vapor compression air-conditioning unit
Researchers across the globe are looking forward to find alternative solutions from the perspective of environmental impact and sustainability relative to conventional refrigerants. In this regard, propane appears to be a feasible choice. This work experimentally investigates the propane-based vapor compression system for the air-conditioning. The performance of the modified cycle employing propane has been investigated under various operating conditions (geometrical configuration of suction and discharge tubes across cycle sub-units). For a given range of temperature at evaporator outlet, coefficient of performance (COP) varies between 3.2–4.4 (finned spiral tube) as compared to 2.6–3.4 (bend tube) and 2.6–3.0 (spiral tube). Notably, the arrangement of a straight tube at the suction line and a finned spiral tube at the discharge line provides the lowest COP (4.36), whereas the arrangement that is precisely the opposite, yields highest COP (4.94). Furthermore, from the perspective of HVAC industry this study demonstrates that fins added to the suction line will improve performance and may increase the overall cooling performance of the set-up.
HitchinR. The primary energy factor and carbon intensity of waste energy. Build Serv Eng Res Technol2023; 44: 81–89.
2.
DincerI. Refrigeration systems and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
3.
RosenMDincerI. Effect of varying dead-state properties on energy and exergy analysis of thermal systems. Int J Therm Sci2004; 43: 121–133.
4.
ChoudhariCSSapaliSN. Performance investigation of natural refrigerant R290 as a substitute to R22 in refrigeration systems. Energy Proc2016; 109: 346–352.
5.
YuCCTengTP. Retrofit assessment of refrigerator using hydrocarbon refrigerants. Appl Therm Eng2014; 66: 507–518.
6.
MiyaraA. Condensation of hydrocarbons – a review. Int J Refrig2008; 31: 621–632.
7.
GranrydE. Hydrocarbons as refrigerants— an overview. Int J Refrig2001; 24: 15–24.
8.
PalmB. Hydrocarbons as refrigerants in small heat pump and refrigeration systems – a review. Int J Refrig2008; 31: 552–563.
9.
DalklicetAS, et al.A performance comparison of vapour compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2010; 37: 1340–1349.
10.
YunZCicongLXiaoningC, et al.Performance study and optimization on alternative refrigerant R290 in R22 low temperature heat pump system. J Refrig2019; 40: 72–77.
11.
XiaoningCCichongLJingyeY, et al.Experimental study on R-22, R-427A, R-161 and R-290 in air-source heat pump for space heating at low ambient temperatures. Int J Refrig2018; 96: 147–154.
12.
ShouguangYJunW. Analysis of performance for R22 and the alternative refrigerant R290 in unit condition system. J East Chinashipbuild Inst2002; 16: 70–73.
13.
MohanrajMJayarajSMuraleedharanC, et al.Experimental investigation of R290/R600a mixture as an alternative to R134a in a domestic refrigerator. Int J Therm Sci2009; 48: 1036–1042.
14.
JungDSongYParkB. Performance des mélanges de frigorigènes utilisés pour remplacer le HCFC22. Int J Refrig2000; 23: 466–474.
15.
DidionDABivensDB. Role of refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to CFCs. Int J Refrig1990; 13: 163–175.
16.
YadavSLiuJKimSC. A comprehensive study on 21st-century refrigerants - R290 and R1234yf: a review. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2022; 182: 121947.
17.
ParkKJJungD. Performance of R290 and R1270 for R22 applications with evaporator and condenser temperature variation. J Mech Sci Technol2008; 22: 532–537.
18.
ShillidayJATassouSAShillidayN. Comparative energy and exergy analysis of R744, R404A and R290 refrigeration cycles. Int J Low-Carbon Technol2009; 4: 104–111.
19.
NiuBZhangY. Experimental study of the refrigeration cycle performance for the R744/R290 mixtures. Int J Refrig2007; 30: 37–42.
20.
AreaCde RossiFGrecoA, et al.Refrigeration plant exergetic analysis varying the compressor capacity. Int J Energy Res2003; 27: 653–669.
21.
ParkKJJungD. Performance of heat pumps charged with R170/R290 mixture. Appl Energy2009; 86: 2598–2603.
22.
AroraASachdevHL. Thermodynamic analysis of R422 series refrigerants as alternative refrigerants to HCFC22 in a vapor compression refrigeration system. Int J Energy Res2009; 33: 753–765.
23.
YueCHanDPuW. Analysis of the integrated characteristics of the CPS (combined power system) of a bottoming organic rankine cycle and a diesel engine. Energy2014; 72: 739–751.
24.
QuoilinSDeclayeSTchancheBF, et al.Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery organic rankine cycles. Appl Therm Eng2011; 31: 2885–2893.
25.
LawrenceNElbelS. Experimental investigation of a two-phase ejector cycle suitable for use with low-pressure refrigerants R134a and R1234yf. Int J Refrig2014; 38: 310–322.
26.
BhatkarVWSurAKumarR. Study of refrigeration system with minichannel condenser using R1234ze, R134a, R152a, R600a, R290 and mixture of R290/R600a (50/50). Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E2023. DOI: 10.1177/09544089231193923.
27.
ShaikSVBabuTA. Theoretical energy performance assessment and environmental impact of various new ozone-friendly refrigerants used in residential air conditioners. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E2020; 234: 367–385.
28.
AllymehrEPardiñasÁÁEikevikTM, et al.Characteristics of evaporation of propane (R290) in compact smooth and microfinned tubes. Appl Therm Eng2020; 181: 115880.
29.
Peña-AntonAAlonsoLMartin-EscuderoK, et al.Design and experimental characterization of a propane-based reversible dual source/sink heat pump. Appl Therm Eng2025; 258: 124527.
30.
UusitaloAJaatinen-VärriATurunen-SaarestiT, et al.Centrifugal compressor design and cycle analysis of large-scale high temperature heat pumps using hydrocarbons. Appl Therm Eng2024; 247: 123035.
31.
BondarevaAP. Calibration of copper-constantan thermocouples at low temperatures. Meas Tech1970; 13: 411–413.
32.
WuJ. A basic guide to thermocouple measurement. Texas Instrum2023; 32: 1–36.
33.
KlineSJMcClintockFA. Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments. Mech Eng1953; 3: 1–4.
