In this work, the experimental investigation on the performance and exergy analysis of mobile air conditioning system with suction line heat exchanger using environmental friendly HFO-1234yf was carried out under varied evaporator air flow rates. The performance was compared with existing HFC-134a results. The performance analysis showed that the cooling capacity and the coefficient of performance of the system with HFO-1234yf were lower than that of the HFC-134a by upto 2–11%. The power consumption and the volumetric efficiency of the compressor with HFO-1234yf were found to be 14.02% and 11.2% higher than that of HFC-134a. From the exergy analysis, it was observed that the major exergy destruction occurred in the compressor, followed by the condenser, evaporator, thermostatic expansion valve, and suction line heat exchanger for both refrigerants. The exergy efficiency of the system with HFO-1234yf was 2.4–12.6% lower than that of HFC-134a. From this study, it was observed that the losses experienced in the compressor, thermostatic expansion valve and evaporator lead to poor performance with HFO-1234yf.
LambertMAJonesBJ. Automotive adsorption air conditioner powered by automotive exhaust, Part 1: Conceptual and embodiment design. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2006; 220: 959–972.
2.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol: HFC Phase-down. 10–16 October 2016, Kigali, Rwanda.
3.
Directive 2006/40/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 May 2006 relating to emissions from air conditioning systems in motor vehicles and amending council directive 70/156/EEC. Off J Eur Union2006; 161: 12–18.
4.
Mohanraj M. Experimental investigations on R430Aas a drop-in substitute for R134a in domestic refrigerators. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0954408918796369.
5.
Andrew Pon AbrahamJDMohanrajM. Thermodynamic performance of automobile air conditioners working with R430A as a drop-in substitute to R134a. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 136: 2071–2086. .
6.
AkasakaRTanakaKHigashiY. Thermodynamic property modeling for 2, 3, 3, 3-tetrafluoropene (R-1234yf). Int J Refrig2010; 33: 52–60.
7.
BrownJS. Introduction to hydrofluoro-olefin alternatives for high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants. HVAC&R Res2013; 19: 693–704.
8.
ZhaoYQiZChenJ, et al.Experimental analysis of the low-GWP refrigerant R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a typical mobile air conditioning system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 226: 2713–2725.
9.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34. Designation and safety classification of refrigerants. ISSN: 1041-2336, 2013.
10.
Lewandowski TA. Additional risk assessments of alternative refrigerant R1234yf. SAE International CRP1234-4 report, 2013.
11.
Spatz MW. Green mobility: HFO-1234yf for MAC. In: SAE world congress, Detroit, MI, 20 April 2009.
12.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Protection of stratospheric ozone: Change of listing status for certain substitutes under the significant new alternatives policy program; final rule. Federal Register, Rules and Regulations2015, pp. 80.
13.
NielsenOJJavadiMSAndersenMPS, et al.Atmospheric chemistry of CF3CF = CH2: Kinetics and mechanisms of gas-phase reactions with Cl atoms, OH radicals, and O3'. Chem Phys Lett2007; 439: 18–22.
14.
BoutonnetJCBinghamPCalamariD, et al.Environmental risk assessment of trifluoroacetic acid. Hum Ecol Risk Assess1999; 5: 59–124.
15.
Kajihara H. Estimation of environmental concentrations and deposition fluxes of R-1234yf and its decomposition products emitted from air conditioning equipment to atmosphere. In: International symposium on next-generation air conditioning and refrigeration technology, Tokyo, Japan, 2010.
16.
LuekenDJWaterlandRTPapasavvaS, et al.Ozone and TFA impacts in North America from degradation of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), a potential greenhouse gas replacement. Environ Sci Technol2010; 44: 343–348.
17.
LeeYJungD. A brief performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a in a bench tester for automobile applications. Appl Therm Eng2012; 35: 240–242.
18.
Mathur GD. Experimental Investigation of AC system performance with HFO-1234yf as the working fluid. SAE International paper, 2010; no. 2010-01-1207.
19.
JunyeSCichhongLJichaoH, et al.Experimental research and optimization on the environmental friendly R1234yf refrigerant in automobile air conditioning system. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Sci)2016; 21: 548–556.
20.
PottkerGHrnjakP. Experimental investigation of the effect of condenser subcooling in R134a and R1234yf air conditioning systems with and without internal heat exchanger. Int J Refrig2015; 50: 104–113.
21.
RajendranPDhasanMLNarayanaswamyGR. Tuning thermostatic expansion valve for implementing suction line heat exchanger in mobile air conditioning system. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 191.
22.
Desai AD, Sapli SN and Garikipati PV. Development of energy efficient R-134a automotive air conditioning system using internalheat exchanger. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2011; vol III, London, UK, 6–8 July.
23.
Kurata S, Suzuki T and Ogura K. Double-pipe internal heat exchanger for efficiency improvement in front automotive air conditioning system. SAE technical paper 2007; 2007-01-1523.
24.
Ravikumar AS, Karwall N and Shah RK. Recent developments in automotive condensers and receiver-dryer technology. SAE technical paper 2005; 2005-01-1770.
25.
PrabakaranRLalDMPrabhakaranA, et al.Experimental investigations on the performance enhancement using minichannel evaporator with integrated receiver-dryer condenser in an automotive air conditioning system. Heat Transfer Eng. Epub ahead of print, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2018.1436663.
26.
ChoHLeeHParkC. Performance characteristics of an automobile air conditioning system with internal heat exchanger using refrigerant R1234yf. Appl Therm Eng2013; 61: 563–569.
27.
EsbriJNMolesFCerveraAB. Experimental analysis of the internal heat exchanger influence on a vapour compression system performance working with R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a. Appl Therm Eng2013; 59: 153–163.
28.
ChoHParkC. Experimental investigation of performance and exergy analysis of automotive air conditioning systems using refrigerant R1234yf at various compressor speeds. Appl Therm Eng2016; 101: 30–37.
29.
GolzariSKasaeianADaviranS, et al.Second law analysis of an automotive air conditioning system using HFO-1234yf, an environmentally friendly refrigerant. Int J Refrig2017; 73: 134–143.
30.
SAE J 2765. Procedure for measuring system COP (Coefficient of Performance) of a mobile air conditioning system on a test bench. 2008.
31.
PrabakaranRLalDM. A novel exergy based charge optimisation for a mobile air conditioning system – An experimental study. J Therm Anal Calorim2018; 132: 1241–1252.
32.
Dincer I and Kanoglu M. Refrigeration systems and applications. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
33.
Lemmon EW, Huber ML and McLinden MO. Reference fluid thermodynamic and transport (REFPROP). Version 8.0, NIST Standard Database 23. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology, 2007.
34.
MoffatRJ. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci1988; 1: 3–17.
35.
VaghelaJK. Comparative evaluation of an automobile air – Conditioning system using R134a and its alternative refrigerants. Energy Procedia2017; 109: 153–160.
