The present investigation focuses on theoretical performance of various new environment-friendly refrigerant mixtures as substitutes to high global warming potential refrigerant R22. In this investigation, 34 refrigerants were considered at various composition. In this work, both complex vapor compression cycle (actual cycle) and standard vapor compression cycle (ideal cycle) was considered for the performance assessment of refrigerants. Vital studies such as flammability, toxicity, and environmental impact of various novel refrigerants were also carried out in this study. Results obtained from actual cycle showed that the coefficient of performance of refrigerant mixture RM40 (R1270/R134a 90/10 in mass %) (2.728) was the greatest among 34 investigated alternatives and it was closer to the coefficient of performance of R22 (2.770). Compressor discharge temperature of RM40 was 13.36 ℃ lower when compared with R22. Volumetric refrigeration capacity of RM40 (3335 kJ/m3) was slightly higher than that of R22 (3297 kJ/m3). Power spent per ton of refrigeration of RM40 (1.288 kW/TR) was marginally higher than that of R22 (1.269 kW/TR). Global warming potential (GWP100) of RM40 (133) was very low compared to the GWP100 of R22 (1760). Total equivalent warming index (environmental impact) of RM40 was 5.61% lower than R22. However, performance results obtained from standard cycle for various investigated refrigerants were better than actual cycle, since various losses occur were neglected in the standard cycle. Overall, thermodynamic performance of refrigerant mixture RM40 (R1270/R134a 90/10 in mass %) obtained from both actual and standard cycle was the highest among 34 investigated refrigerants and it was very closer to the performance of R22 and hence, it could be considered as an environment-friendly alternative to replace high GWP refrigerant R22 used in refrigeration systems.
MohanrajMJayarajSMuraleedharanC. Environment friendly alternatives to halogenated refrigerants-A review. Int J Greenh Gas Control2009; 3: 108–119.
2.
UNEP. Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Final Act. New York: United Nation Environment Program, 1997.
3.
PowellRL. CFC phase-out: have we met the challenge?. J Fluorine Chem2002; 114: 237–250.
4.
DevottaSPadalkarASSaneNK. Performance assessment of HC-290 as a drop-in substitute to HCFC-22 in a window air conditioner. Int J Refrig2005; 28: 594–604.
5.
ChenJ. Zeotropic refrigerants and the special characteristics. Proc IMechE,, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2005; 219: 183–186.
DevottaSPadalkarASSaneNK. Performance assessment of HCFC-22 window air conditioner retrofitted with R-407C. Appl Therm Eng2005; 25: 2937–2949.
8.
ZhaoYQiZChenJ, et al.Experimental analysis of the low-GWP refrigerant R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a typical mobile air conditioning system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 226: 2713–2725.
9.
LiZLiangKJiangH. Experimental study of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in an oil-free refrigeration system. Appl Therm Eng2019; 153: 646–654.
10.
SánchezDCabelloRLlopisR, et al.Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R600a, R290 and R152a as low GWP R134a alternatives. Int J Refrig2017; 74: 269–282.
11.
LiZJiangHChenX, et al.Comparative study on energy efficiency of low GWP refrigerants in domestic refrigerators with capacity modulation. Energy Build2019; 192: 93–100.
12.
VaghelaJK. Comparative evaluation of an automobile air-conditioning system using R134a and its alternative refrigerants. Energy Procedia2017; 109: 153–160.
13.
DalkilicASWongwisesS. A performance comparison of vapour-compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2010; 37: 1340–1349.
14.
BolajiBO. Theoretical analysis of the energy performance of three low global warming potential hydro-fluorocarbon refrigerants as R134a alternatives in refrigeration systems. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power Energy2014; 228: 56–63.
15.
AroraAKaushikSC. Theoretical analysis of a vapour compression refrigeration system with R502, R404A and R507A. Int J Refrig2008; 31: 998–1005.
16.
MohanrajM. Experimental investigations on R430A as a drop-in substitute for R134a in domestic refrigerators. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2018, pp. 1–11.
17.
SethiABecerraEVMottaSFY, et al.Low GWP R22 replacement for air conditioning in high ambient conditions. Int J Refrig2015; 57: 26–34.
18.
Mota-BabiloniANavarro-EsbríJMakhnatchP, et al.Refrigerant R32 as lower GWP working fluid in residential air conditioning systems in Europe and the USA. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 80: 1031–1042.
19.
DevecioğluAG. Seasonal performance assessment of refrigerants with low GWP as substitutes for R410A in heat pump air conditioning devices. Appl Therm Eng2017; 125: 401–411.
20.
DevecioğluAGOruçV. The influence of plate-type heat exchanger on energy efficiency and environmental effects of the air-conditioners using R453A as a substitute for R22. Appl Therm Eng2017; 112: 1364–1372.
21.
AizedTHamzaA. Thermodynamic analysis of various refrigerants for automotive air conditioning system. Arab J Sci Eng2019; 44: 1697–1707.
UNFCCC. Kyoto Protocol, Report of the Conference of the Parties, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, USA, 1997.
25.
OrucVDevecioğluAG. Thermodynamic performance of air conditioners working with R417A and R424A as alternatives to R22. Int J Refrig2015; 55: 120–128.
26.
BolajiBO. Performance investigation of ozone-friendly R404A and R507 refrigerants as alternatives to R22 in a window air-conditioner. Energy Build2011; 43: 3139–3143.
27.
ANSI/ASHRAE. Addenda a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2007, Designation and safety classification of refrigerants. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2007.
28.
ParkKJShimYBJungD. A ‘drop-in’ refrigerant R431A for replacing HCFC22 in residential air-conditioners and heat pumps. Energy Convers Manage2009; 50: 1671–1675.
29.
ParkKJShimYBJungD. Experimental performance of R432A to replace R22 in residential air-conditioners and heat pumps. Appl Therm Eng2009; 29: 597–600.
30.
ParkKJShimYBJungD. Performance of R433A for replacing HCFC22 used in residential air-conditioners and heat pumps. Appl Energy2008; 85: 896–900.
OruçVDevecioğluAGBerkU, et al.Experimental comparison of the energy parameters of HFCs used as alternatives to HCFC-22 in split type air conditioners. Int J Refrig2016; 63: 125–132.
33.
Wang X and Amrane K. AHRI low global warming potential alternative refrigerants evaluation program (Low-GWP AREP)-summary of phase I testing results. In: Proceedings of the 15th international refrigeration and air conditioning conference, Purdue, USA, 2014, pp.1–10.
34.
Wang X and Amrane K. AHRI low global warming potential alternative refrigerants evaluation program (low-GWP AREP)-summary of phase II testing results. In: Proceedings of the 16th international refrigeration and air conditioning conference, Purdue, USA, 2016, pp.1–10.
35.
Schultz K and Kujak S. System drop-in tests of R-22 alternative fluids (ARM-32a, DR-7, L-20, LTR4X, LTR6A, and D52Y) in a 5-RT air-cooled water chiller (cooling mode). Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Low-GWP Alternative Refrigerants Evaluation Program, Report No. 6, 2013, pp.1–27.
36.
Abdelaziz O and Shrestha S. Soft-optimized system test of alternative lower GWP refrigerants in 1.5-ton mini-split air conditioning units. AHRI-AREP Test Report No. 62, 2016, pp.1–28.
37.
ASHRAE. ASHRAE standard 34 designation and safety classification of refrigerants. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2013.
38.
KondoSTakahashiATokuhashiK, et al.RF number as a new index for assessing combustion hazard of flammable gases. J Hazard Mater2002; 93: 259–267.
39.
DaviesTWCarettaO. A low carbon, low TEWI refrigeration system design. Appl Therm Eng2004; 24: 1119–1128.
40.
Babu TP, Samaje VV and Rajeev R. Development of zero ODP, less TEWI, binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures to replace HCFC-22 in window air-conditioner. In: Proceedings of the international refrigeration and air conditioning conference, Purdue, USA, 2006, pp.1–8.
41.
La RoccaVPannoG. Experimental performance evaluation of a vapour compression refrigerating plant when replacing R22 with alternative refrigerants. Appl Energy2011; 88: 2809–2815.
42.
BolajiBOAbialaIOIsmailaSO, et al.A theoretical comparison of two eco-friendly refrigerants as alternatives to R22 using a simple vapour compression refrigeration system. T Famena2014; 38: 59–70.
43.
BolajiBOHuanZ. Computational analysis of the performance of ozone-friendly R22 alternative refrigerants in vapour compression air-conditioning systems. Environ Protect Eng2012; 38: 41–52.
44.
BolajiBOHuanZ. Performance investigation of some hydro-fluorocarbon refrigerants with low global warming as substitutes to R134a in refrigeration systems. J Eng Thermophys2014; 23: 148–157.
45.
ShaikSVSettyAB. Thermodynamic analysis of window air conditioner using sustainable refrigerant R290/RE170and R1270/RE170 blends as substitutes to refrigerant R22. Int J Heat Technol2019; 37: 80–94.
46.
VenkatarathnamGMurthySS. Performance of some zeotropic mixtures as alternative refrigerants to R22 and R502. Int J Energy Res1998; 22: 1065–1073.
47.
WangFFanXLianZ, et al.Performance assessment of heat pumps using HFC125/HCs mixtures. Int J Energy Res2012; 36: 1005–1014.
48.
ARI Standard 540. Performance rating of positive displacement refrigerant compressors and compressor units. Arlington, VA: ARI, 2004.
49.
Arora RC. Refrigeration and air conditioning. 2nd ed. New Delhi, 2012. PHI Learning Private Limited.
50.
Arora CP. Refrigeration and air conditioning. 3rd ed. New Delhi, 2010. Tata McGraw-Hill.
51.
Dincer I. Refrigeration systems and applications. 3rd ed. West Sussex, 2017. Wiley.
52.
AroraAAroraBBPathakBD, et al.Exergy analysis of a vapour compression refrigeration system with R-22, R-407C and R-410A. Int J Exergy2007; 4: 441–454.
53.
AroraASachdevHL. Thermodynamic analysis of R422 series refrigerants as alternative refrigerants to HCFC22 in a vapour compression refrigeration system. Int J Energy Res2009; 33: 753–765.
54.
ShaikSVBabuTP. Thermodynamic performance analysis and flammability study of various new ozone friendly non azeotropic refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to replace R22 used in residential air conditioners. Int J Heat Technol2018; 36: 1470–1481.
55.
Lemmon EW, McLinden MO and Huber ML. NIST reference fluids thermodynamic and transport properties REFPROP 9.1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2013.
56.
TianQCaiDRenL, et al.An experimental investigation of refrigerant mixture R32/R290 as drop-in replacement for HFC410A in household air conditioners. Int J Refrig2015; 57: 216–228.
57.
ChenJYuJ. Performance of a new refrigeration cycle using refrigerant mixture R32/R134a for residential air-conditioner applications. Energy Build2008; 40: 2022–2027.
