Development and evaluation of hydroxytite-based anti-microbial surface coatings on polydopamine-treated porous 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloys for overall biofunctionality
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2025
Development and evaluation of hydroxytite-based anti-microbial surface coatings on polydopamine-treated porous 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloys for overall biofunctionality
The current investigation aims to develop hydroxyapatite-based biofunctional composite coatings on polydopamine-treated porous 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloy implant specimens for orthopedic uses. The porous 3D-printed implants based on Ashby Gibson’s mathematical model for cellular materials are fabricated at a 65% level of porosity, so as to attain the mechanical strength of human bones. Further, the addition of strontium and silver in hydroxyapatite for improved biocompatibility of the 3D-printed implant to enhance its biofunctionality and its validation is performed. The resulting coated substrates are subjected to a series of morphological, elemental, phase, mechanical, and biological tests. When subjected to the uniaxial compression, the values for modulus of elasticity and yield strength of 3D-printed substrates are compared to the targeted value of elastic modulus and yield strength for the human bones (10–30 GPa and 148–240 MPa, respectively). The effect of polydopamine-treated 3D-printed Ti6Al4V substrates on the coating compositions of calcium and phosphorus has been compared to the untreated samples. The coating thickness and adhesion strength have been calculated and compared for different coating groups. All the samples, except untreated pure hydroxyapatite samples, displayed antimicrobial activity for both the gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in the zone inhibition test. Hence, the current experiment provides a novel option to fabricate porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds, with a low-temperature surface coating to attain improved biofunctionality for orthopedic applications.
SainiMSinghYAroraP,et al.Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases: WJCC2015; 3: 52.
2.
ShankarSNithyaprakashRAbbasG,et al.In-vitro tribological study and submodeling finite element technique in analyzing wear of zirconia toughened alumina against alumina with bio-lubricants for hip implants. Med Eng Phys2021; 98: 83–90.
3.
BremeHBiehlVRegerN,et al.A metallic biomaterial: Introduction. In Handbook of biomaterial properties. New York, NY: Springer, 2016, pp.151–158.
4.
NavarroMMichiardiACastanoO,et al.Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface2008; 5: 1137–1158.
5.
BainoFPotestioI. Orbital implants: State-of-the-art review with emphasis on biomaterials and recent advances. Mater Sci Eng: C2016; 69: 1410–1428.
6.
KorkmazMEGuptaMKWaqarS,et al.A short review on thermal treatments of titanium & nickel based alloys processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Res Technol2021; 16: 1090–1101.
7.
ManamNSHarunWSShriDN,et al.Study of corrosion in biocompatible metals for implants: A review. J Alloys Compd2017; 701: 698–715.
8.
LiYYangCZhaoH,et al.New developments of Ti-based alloys for biomedical applications. Materials (Basel)2014; 7: 1709e–11800.
9.
GeethaMSinghAKAsokamaniR,et al.Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog. Mater. Sci2009; 54: 397e–3425.
10.
ZyssetPKEdward GuoXEdward HofflerC,et al.Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J. Biomech1999; 32: 1005e–11012.
11.
DhimanSSinghMSidhuSS,et al.Cubic lattice structures of Ti6Al4V under compressive loading: towards assessing the performance for hard tissue implants alternative. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 3866.
12.
RamyaAVanapalliSL. 3D Printing technologies in various applications. Int J Mech Eng Technol2016; 7: 396–409.
13.
SinghSPrakashCSinghR. 3D Printing in biomedical engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 167–186.
14.
RoskiesMJordanJOFangD,et al.Improving PEEK bioactivity for craniofacial reconstruction using a 3D printed scaffold embedded with mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomater Appl2016; 31: 132–139.
15.
PrakashCSinghGSinghS,et al.Mechanical reliability and in vitro bioactivity of 3D-printed porous polylactic acid-hydroxyapatite scaffold. J Mater Eng Perform2021; 30: 4946–4956.
16.
SinghGSainiA. Developments in metallic biomaterials and surface coatings for various biomedical applications. In Advances in materials processing. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp.197–206.
17.
GuptaMKEtriHEKorkmazME,et al.Tribological and surface morphological characteristics of titanium alloys: A review. Arch Civ Mech Eng2022; 22: 1–23.
18.
SinghGSainiAPablaB. Preparation and characterization of Sr-doped HAp biomedical coatings on polydopamine-treated Ti6Al4V substrates. Surf Rev Lett2022; 2141009.
19.
PrakashCKansalHKPablaBS,et al.Processing and characterization of novel biomimetic nanoporous bioceramic surface on β-Ti implant by powder mixed electric discharge machining. J Mater Eng Perform2015; 24: 3622–3633.
20.
KodamaABauerSKomatsuA,et al.Bioactivation of titanium surfaces using coatings of TiO2 nanotubes rapidly pre-loaded with synthetic hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 2322–2330.
21.
TasACBhaduriSB. Rapid coating of Ti6Al4V at room temperature with a calcium phosphate solution similar to 10 × simulated body fluid. J Mater Res2004; 19: 2742–2749.
22.
BabbarAJainVGuptaD,et al.Experimental investigation and parametric optimization of neurosurgical bone grinding under bio-mimic environment. Surf Rev Lett2021: 2141005.
ReyesCDPetrieTABurnsKL,et al.Biomolecular surface coating to enhance orthopaedic tissue healing and integration. Biomaterials2007; 28: 3228–3235.
25.
LiuYAiKLuL. Polydopamine and its derivative materials: Synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev2014; 114: 5057–5115.
26.
XuAZhouLDengY,et al.A carboxymethyl chitosan and peptide-decorated polyetheretherketone ternary biocomposite with enhanced antibacterial activity and osseointegration as orthopedic/dental implants. J Mater Chem B2016; 4: 1878–1890.
27.
LiHYinDLiW,et al.Polydopamine-based nanomaterials and their potentials in advanced drug delivery and therapy. Colloids Surf B2021; 199: 111502.
28.
PradeepNBHegdeMRPatelGM,et al.Synthesis and characterization of mechanically alloyed nanostructured ternary titanium based alloy for bio-medical applications. J Mater Res Technol2022; 16: 88–101.
29.
Kazemzadeh-NarbatMKindrachukJDuanK,et al.Antimicrobial peptides on calcium phosphate-coated titanium for the prevention of implant-associated infections. Biomaterials2010; 31: 9519–9526.
30.
KurtzSOngKLauE,et al.Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 780–785.
31.
WangQLiPTangP, et al.Experimental and simulation studies of strontium/fluoride-codoped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with osteogenic and antibacterial activities. Colloids Surf B2019; 182: 110359.
32.
WangSLiRLiD,et al.Fabrication of bioactive 3D printed porous titanium implants with Sr ion-incorporated zeolite coatings for bone ingrowth. J Mater Chem B2018; 6: 3254–3261.
33.
SinghGSainiAPablaBS. In-vitro mineralization of bio-coated 3D printed metallic implant under simulated body conditions. Mater Today: Proc2022; 50: 1946–1952.
34.
FurkoMHavasiVKónyaZ,et al.Development and characterization of multi-element doped hydroxyapatite bioceramic coatings on metallic implants for orthopedic applications. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio2018; 57: 55–65.
35.
LiJBLinHCJangJS,et al.Novel open-cell bulk metallic glass foams with promising characteristics. Mater Lett2013; 105: 140–143.
36.
WeißmannVBaderRHansmannH,et al.Influence of the structural orientation on the mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V open-porous scaffolds. Mater Des2016; 95: 188–197.
37.
ZhangXXHouHWWeiLS,et al.High damping capacity in porous NiTi alloy with bimodal pore architecture. J Alloys Compd2013; 550: 297–301.
38.
FacchiniLMagaliniERobottiP,et al.Ductility of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J2010; 16: 450–459.
39.
AshbyMFEvansTFleckNA,et al.Metal foams: A design guide. Elsevier, 2000, pp. 40–54. ISBN: 978-0-7506-7219-1.
40.
Mabrouk MohamedM. Preparation of PVA/Bioactive Glass nanocomposite scaffolds: In vitro studies for applications as biomaterials: Association with active molecule (Doctoral dissertation, Rennes 1).
41.
WangLZhaoGOlivares-NavarreteR,et al.Integrin β1 silencing in osteoblasts alters substrate-dependent responses to 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. Biomaterials2006; 27: 3716–3725.
ClemowAJWeinsteinAMKlawitterJJ,et al.Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res1981; 15: 73–82.
44.
ZhangLZhangYQJiangYH,et al.Superelastic behaviors of biomedical porous NiTi alloy with high porosity and large pore size prepared by spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd2015; 644: 513–522.
45.
WegrzynJKaufmanKRHanssenAD,et al.Performance of porous tantalum vs. titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty: Randomized trial with minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty2015; 30: 1008–1013.
46.
ZheWDongCSefeiY,et al.Facile incorporation of hydroxyapatite onto an anodized Ti surface via a mussel inspired polydopamine coating. Appl Surf Sci2016; 378: 496–503.
47.
SunLChowLCFrukhtbeynSA,et al.Preparation and properties of nanoparticles of calcium phosphates with various Ca/P ratios. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol2010; 115: 243.
48.
LiuHYaziciHErgunC,et al.An in vitro evaluation of the Ca/P ratio for the cytocompatibility of nano-to-micron particulate calcium phosphates for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater2008; 4: 1472–1479.
49.
RajkumarMSundaramNMRajendranV. Preparation of size controlled, stoichiometric and bioresorbable hydroxyapatite nanorod by varying initial pH, Ca/P ratio and sintering temperature. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct2011; 6: 169–179.
50.
RaoSUshidaTTateishiT,et al.Effect of Ti, Al, and V ions on the relative growth rate of fibroblasts (L929) and osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) cells. Bio-Med Mater Eng1996; 6: 79–86.
51.
PerlDPMoalemS. Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease, a personal perspective after 25 years. J Alzheimer’s Dis2006; 9: 291–300.
52.
UngureanuEIonescuICZamfir-AndronicRI, et al.Biofunctionalization of TI6AL4V surface with Ag modified HAP coatings via electrochemical deposition.
53.
FengZLiaoYYeM. Synthesis and structure of cerium-substituted hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2005; 16: 417–421.
54.
PishbinFMourinoVGilchristJB,et al.Single-step electrochemical deposition of antimicrobial orthopaedic coatings based on a bioactive glass/chitosan/nano-silver composite system. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 7469–7479.
55.
YangMLiCZhangY,et al.Microscale bone grinding temperature by dynamic heat flux in nanoparticle jet mist cooling with different particle sizes. Mater Manuf Processes2018; 33: 58–68.
56.
LiuFZhangDZZhangP,et al.Mechanical properties of optimized diamond lattice structure for bone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser melting. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 374.
