Brake pads are an essential component of the vehicle’s braking system, which produces the friction required to halt or reduce the vehicle’s motion. The pad material and the surface area in contact with the rotor greatly influence braking performance. These elements impact vehicle dynamics, brake cooling, wear on braking components, heat dissipation, and frictional force. The wear rate, friction coefficient, thermal stability, longevity, environmental impact, potential health risks, and overall braking performance of various brake pad materials and designs are all examined in this review article. This study also emphasizes the benefits of cutting-edge technologies like nanotechnology, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in the development of innovative brake pad materials.
HarperGA.Brakes and friction materials: the history and development of the technologies. Mechanical Engineering Publications, 1998.
2.
GentaGMorelloLCavallinoF, et al. The motor car: past, present and future. Springer Science & Business Media, 2014.
3.
von AlbrichsfeldCKarnerJ. Brake system for hybrid and electric vehicles. SAE Technical Paper, 2009.
4.
AkayA.Acoustics of friction. J Acoust Soc Am2002; 111: 1525–1548.
5.
KimSJJangH.Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp. Tribol Int2000; 33: 477–484.
6.
AlbatlanSA.Study effect of pads shapes on temperature distribution for disc brake contact surface. Int J Eng Res Develop2013; 8: 62–67.
7.
PodoprigoraNDobromirovVPushkarevA, et al. Methods of assessing the influence of operational factors on brake system efficiency in investigating traffic accidents. Transp Res Proc2017; 20: 516–522.
8.
SingaraveluDLVijayRFilipP.Influence of various cashew friction dusts on the fade and recovery characteristics of non-asbestos copper free brake friction composites. Wear2019; 426: 1129–1141.
9.
JackoMGTsangPHSRheeSK.Automotive friction materials evolution during the past decade. Wear1984; 100: 503–515.
10.
JackoMGRheeSK. Brake linings and clutch facings. In: OthmerK (ed.) Encyclopedia of chemical technology. Editorial Limusa S.A. De C.V.
11.
ChoMHKimSJKimD, et al. Effects of ingredients on tribological characteristics of a brake lining: an experimental case study. Wear2005; 258: 1682–1687.
12.
IrawanAPFitriyanaDFTezaraC, et al. Overview of the important factors influencing the performance of eco-friendly brake pads. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 1180.
13.
IlieFCtristescuAC.Structural and tribological analysis of brake disc–pad pair material for cars. Appl Sci2024; 14: 3523.
14.
BhattBMaratheUKalelN, et al. Efficacy of high-performance epoxy resin as a binder to replace eco-unfriendly phenolic resins in Cu-free brake pads. Tribol Int2025; 202: 110359.
15.
NandiyantoABDPiantaraEAlvaniC, et al. Fabrication of resin-based brake pad from snake fruit peel as sustainable renewable resources to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS). J Eng Sci Technol2024; 19: 2022–2037.
16.
SeoHGweonJLeeJJ, et al. The effect of solid lubricants in the brake friction composite on brake emissions: a case study with graphite, Sb2S3, and MoS2. Tribol Int2024; 193: 109413.
17.
BengisuMTAkayA.Stability of friction-induced vibrations in multi-degree-of-freedom systems. J Sound Vib1994; 171: 557–570.
KrauterAI.Generation of squeal/chatter in water-lubricated elastomeric bearings. J Lubr Technol1981; 103(3): 406–412.
20.
ParupudiA. Singing wine glasses. Doctoral dissertation. Kansas State University, 2015.
21.
SathyamoorthyGVijayRLenin SingaraveluD.Brake friction composite materials: a review on classifications and influences of friction materials in braking performance with characterizations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J: J Eng Tribol2022; 236: 1674–1706.
22.
RaghunathanVSathyamoorthyGAyyappanV, et al. Advances in brake friction materials: a comprehensive review of ingredients, processing methods, and performance characteristics. J Vinyl Addit Technol2024; 30: 1396–1431.
23.
RaghunathanVSathyamoorthyGAyyappanV, et al. Effective utilization of surface-processed/untreated Cardiospermum halicababum agro-waste fiber for automobile brake pads and its tribological performance. Tribol Int2024; 197: 109776.
24.
KumarVVDhanalakshmiSRaghunathanV, et al. Characterization of allium sativum stalk-based biomass for automotive brake pad applications. Biomass Convers Biorefin2025; 15: 9215–9228.
25.
RaghunathanVGnanasekaranSAyyappanV, et al. Sustainable characterization of brake pads using raw/silane-treated Mimosa pudica fibers for automobile applications. Polym Compos2024; 45: 10204–10219.
26.
LiewKWNirmalU.Frictional performance evaluation of newly designed brake pad materials. Mater Des2013; 48: 25–33.
27.
LiewKWEl-TayebNSM. The effect of rotor disc material on tribo behavior of automotive brake pad materials. Surf Rev Lett2008; 15: 625–633.
28.
AdemohNAOlabisiAI.Development and evaluation of maize husks (asbestos-free) based brake pad. Development2015; 5: 67–80.
29.
AuliaFRantoRHarjantoB.Experimental study of performance of braking natural fiber brake camping with fiber film in wet condition as a alternative material of motor brake campas. J Mech Eng Vocation Educ2019; 2: 69–75.
30.
CaoJBaoJYinY, et al. Intelligent prediction of wear life of automobile brake pad based on braking conditions. Indust Lubr Tribol2023; 75: 157–165.
31.
ShrivastavaSRajakDKJoshiT, et al. Ceramic matrix composites: classifications, manufacturing, properties, and applications. Ceramics2024; 7: 652–679.
32.
Byeong-ChoonGIn-SikC.Microstructural analysis and wear performance of carbon-fiber-reinforced SiC composite for brake pads. Materials2017; 10: 701.
33.
KumarSSBaiVSRajasekharanT.Aluminium matrix composites by pressureless infiltration: the metallurgical and physical properties. J Phys D Appl Phys2008; 41: 105403.
34.
SivananthanRTharunKLokeshG, et al. Experimentation on composite brake pads with aluminum reinforcement of SiC and Flyash. Int J Pure Appl Math2018; 118: 1–11.
35.
KrenkelWLanghofN. Ceramic matrix composites for high performance friction applications. In: Proceedings of the IV advanced ceramics and applications conference. Springer, 2017, pp. 13–28.
36.
BajpaiASaxenaPKunzeK.Tribo-mechanical characterization of carbon fiber-reinforced cyanate ester resins modified with fillers. Polymers (Basel)2020; 12: 1725.
37.
RajakDKWaghPHLinulE.Manufacturing technologies of carbon/glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites and their properties: a review. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 3721.
38.
Serrano-MunozIMagnierVBrunelF, et al. Influence of the composition on the compressive behaviour of a semi-metallic brake-pad material. Materials2022; 15: 7911.
39.
BasharD-AMadaksonPBManjiJ.Material selection and production of a cold-worked composite brake pad. World J Eng Pure Appl Sci2012; 2: 92.
40.
AkilHMOmarMFMazukiAAM, et al. Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Mater Des2011; 32: 4107–4121.
41.
TonkR.Natural fibers for sustainable additive manufacturing: a state of the art review. Mater Today Proc2021; 37: 3087–3090.
42.
GopinathASenthilkumarMBabuA.Evaluation of mechanical properties and microstructure of polyester and epoxy resin matrices reinforced with jute, e-glass and coconut fiber. Mater Today Proc2018; 5: 20092–20103.
43.
ChandradassJAmutha SurabhiMBaskara SethupathiP, et al. Development of low cost brake pad material using asbestos free sugarcane bagasse ash hybrid composites. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 7050–7057.
44.
IshidiEYAdamuIKKolawaleEG, et al. Morphology and thermal properties of alkaline treated palm kernel nut shell - HDPE composites. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci2011; 2: 346–350.
45.
ElakhameZUOlotuOOAbiodunYO, et al. Production of asbestos free brake pad using periwinkle shell as filler material. Int J Sci Eng Res2017; 8: 1728–1735.
46.
LawalSSBalaKCAlegbedeAT. Development and production of brake pad from sawdust composite. LJS2017; 30: 47–56.
47.
RamanathanKSaravanakumarPRamkumarS, et al. Development of asbestos–free brake pads using lemon peel powder. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol2017; 6: 4449–4455.
48.
YigremMFatobaOTensayS.Tribological and mechanical properties of banana peel hybrid composite for brake-pad application. Mater Today Proc2022; 62: 2829–2838.
49.
Ravi KumarKPridharTSree BalajiVS. Mechanical properties and characterization of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) and coconut shell ash (CSA) reinforced aluminium (Al 6082) matrix hybrid composite. J Alloys Compd2018; 765: 171–179.
50.
AsotahWAdelekeA.Development of asbestos free brake pads using corn husks. Leonardo Electr J Pract Technol2017; 31: 129–144.
51.
AbhulimenEAOrumwenseFFO. Characterization and development of asbestos-free brake pad, using snail shell and rubber seed husk. Afr J Eng Res2017; 5: 24–34.
52.
DirisuJOOkokpujieIPApiafiPB, et al. Development of eco-friendly brake pads using industrial and agro-waste materials. J Eng Appl Sci2024; 71: 55.
53.
AigbodionVSAkadikeUHassanSB, et al. Development of asbestos-free brake pad using bagasse. Tribol Indus2010; 32: 12.
54.
NandiyantoABDFitrianiAFPradanaRA, et al. Green innovation in brake pad production: harnessing teak powder and clam shells as sustainable alternatives for subtractive residual waste. Mor J Chem2024; 12: 714–733.
55.
HanMJLeeCHParkTW, et al. Coupled thermo-mechanical analysis and shape optimization for reducing uneven wear of brake pads. Int J Autom Technol2017; 18: 1027–1035.
56.
GhorbelAZghalBAbdennadherM, et al. A new approach considering the brake pad geometry in brake squeal. Arch Appl Mech2019; 89: 2075–2088.
57.
WuGTianCLiuZ.Study on the temperature dissipation performance of brake pads with different surface patterns. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng2024; 48: 700–710.
58.
VijayRRajanBSSathickbashaK, et al. Influence of metal sulfide coated steel fibers on the friction and wear performance of brake friction composites. Tribol Int2022; 176: 107924.
59.
SathickbashaKSelvakumarASSai BalajiMA, et al. Tribo performance of brake friction composite with stainless steel fiber. In: LakshminarayananAKVasudevanMIdapalapatiS (eds) Advances in materials and metallurgy: select proceedings of ICEMMM 2018. Springer, 2018, pp. 159–169.
60.
ShariffSMPalTKPadmanabhamG, et al. Comparative study on dry sliding wear behavior of various railroad steels. J Tribol2011; 133(2): 021602.
61.
KalelNBhattBDarpeA, et al. Copper-free brake-pads: a break-through by selection of the right kind of stainless steel particles. Wear2021; 464–465: 203537.
62.
SaindaneUVSoniSMenghaniJV.Recent research status on synthesis and characterization of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites and modern friction materials – an overview. Mater Today Proc2020; 26: 1616–1620.
63.
WangGFuR.Impact of brake pad structure on temperature and stress fields of brake disc. Adv Mater Sci Eng2013; 2013: 872972.
64.
KimCZhouK.Analysis of automotive disc brake squeal considering damping and design modifications for pads and a disc. Int J Autom Technol2016; 17: 213–223.
65.
XieMSZhangGRLiJH, et al. Brake pad taper wear on brake moan noise. Int J Autom Technol2014; 15: 565–571.
66.
AlemaniMWahlströmJOlofssonU.On the influence of car brake system parameters on particulate matter emissions. Wear2018; 396–397: 67–74.
67.
Gerlofs-NijlandMEBokkersBGHSachseH, et al. Inhalation toxicity profiles of particulate matter: a comparison between brake wear with other sources of emission. Inhal Toxicol2019; 31: 89–98.
68.
VoltaASforziniSCamuratiC, et al. Ecotoxicological effects of atmospheric particulate produced by braking systems on aquatic and edaphic organisms. Environ Int2020; 137: 105564.
69.
NeisPDFerreiraNFFeketeG, et al. Towards a better understanding of the structures existing on the surface of brake pads. Tribol Int2017; 105: 135–147.
70.
LuYTangCWrightMA.Optimization of a commercial brake pad formulation. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 84: 2498–2504.
71.
GurunathPVBijweJ.Friction and wear studies on brake-pad materials based on newly developed resin. Wear2007; 263: 1212–1219.
72.
El-TayebNSMLiewKW. On the dry and wet sliding performance of potentially new frictional brake pad materials for automotive industry. Wear2009; 266: 275–287.
73.
AkıncıoğluGUygurİAkıncıoğluS, et al. Friction-wear performance in environmentally friendly brake composites: a comparison of two different test methods. Polym Compos2021; 42: 4461–4477.
74.
ÖktemHAkıncıoğluSUygurİ, et al. A novel study of hybrid brake pad composites: new formulation, tribological behaviour and characterisation of microstructure. Plast Rubber Compos2021; 50: 249–261.
75.
AkıncıoğluGÖktemHUygurI, et al. Determination of friction-wear performance and properties of eco-friendly brake pads reinforced with hazelnut shell and boron dusts. Arab J Sci Eng2018; 43: 4727–4737.
76.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al. Brake pad performance characteristic assessment methods. Int J Autom Sci Technol2021; 5: 67–78.
77.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al. Evaluation of the physical properties of hazelnut shell dust-added brake pad samples treated with cryogenic process. Politeknik Dergisi2019; 22: 591–596.
78.
AkıncıoğluGAkıncıoğluSÖktemH, et al. Wear response of non-asbestos brake pad composites reinforced with walnut shell dust. J Austral Ceram Soc2020; 56: 1061–1072.
79.
TalatiFJalalifarS.Analysis of heat conduction in a disk brake system. Heat Mass Transfer2009; 45: 1047–1059.
80.
TrichêsMJúniorGergesSNYJordanR. Analysis of brake squeal noise using the finite element method: a parametric study. Appl Acoust2008; 69: 147–162.
81.
MackinTJNoeSCBallKJ, et al. Thermal cracking in disc brakes. Eng Fail Anal2002; 9: 63–76.
82.
ErikssonMBergmanFJacobsonS.On the nature of tribological contact in automotive brakes. Wear2002; 252: 26–36.
83.
ChungWSJungSPParkTW.Numerical analysis method to estimate thermal deformation of a ventilated disc for automotives. J Mech Sci Technol2010; 24: 2189–2195.
84.
ChenFAbdelhamidMKBlaschkeP, et al. On automotive disc brake squeal part III test and evaluation. SAE Technical Paper, 2003.
85.
LeeJJLeeJAKwonS, et al. Effect of different reinforcement materials on the formation of secondary plateaus and friction properties in friction materials for automobiles. Tribol Int2018; 120: 70–79.
86.
ZhangPZhangLFuK, et al. The effect of Al2O3 fiber additive on braking performance of copper-based brake pads utilized in high-speed railway train. Tribol Int2019; 135: 444–456.
87.
PalaiBKSarangiSK.Suitability evaluation of untreated and surface-modified Eichhornia crassipes fibers for brake pad applications. J Nat Fibers2022; 19: 5395–5408.
88.
AliSKumarNGrewalJSG, et al. Coconut waste fiber used as brake pad reinforcement polymer composite and compared to standard Kevlar-based brake pads to produce an asbestos free brake friction material. Polym Compos2022; 43: 1518–1525.
89.
KepekciHKosaEEzgiC, et al. Three-dimensional CFD modeling of thermal behavior of a disc brake and pad for an automobile. Int J Low Carbon Technol2020; 15: 543–549.
90.
ChaqouriMManianaMTajmouatiA.Influence of pad geometry on the thermomechanical study of a disc brake. Int J Inform Sci Technol2024; 8: 21–27.
91.
GrkićAMiklucDMuždekaS, et al. A model for the estimation of brake interface temperature. Strojniški Vestnik J Mech Eng2015; 61: 392–398.
92.
ChenZYiY-BBaoK, et al. Numerical analysis of the coupling between frictionally excited thermoelastic instability and thermal buckling in automotive clutches. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J: J Eng Tribol2018; 233: 178–187.
93.
KorantengKShaahuJ-SChengnanM, et al. The performance of Cu-based friction material in dry clutch engagement. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J: J Eng Tribol2020; 235: 1114–1123.
94.
AbendrothHWernitzB.The integrated test concept: dyno-vehicle, performance-noise. SAE Technical Paper, 2000.
95.
SherifHA.Investigation on effect of surface topography of pad/disc assembly on squeal generation. Wear2004; 257: 687–695.
96.
ShinKBrennanMJOhJE, et al. Analysis of disc brake noise using a two-degree-of-freedom model. J Sound Vib2002; 254: 837–848.
97.
Abu BakarAROuyangHJamesS, et al. Finite element analysis of wear and its effect on squeal generation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Autom Eng2008; 222: 1153–1165.
98.
WitikRAPayetJMichaudV, et al. Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1694–1709.
99.
SundayAV.Unveiling the frictional properties of brake pads developed from silver nanoparticles modified carbon nanotubes derived from rice husks. Tribol Int2024; 192: 109270.
100.
GuinéeJBHeijungsRHuppesG, et al. Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol2011; 45: 90–96.
101.
YuCChenJZhangQ, et al. Research progress on friction and wear properties of powder metallurgy brake pad. Adv Mech Eng2022; 14: 16878132221126854.
102.
NazirMSPalvashaBATahirZ, et al. An overview on eco-friendly polymer composites for heavy metal ion remediation. Curr Anal Chem2021; 17: 737–753.
103.
RameshMDeepaCKumarLR, et al. Life-cycle and environmental impact assessments on processing of plant fibres and its bio-composites: a critical review. J Indus Text2020; 51: 5518S–5542S.
104.
ZhangXZhangYDuS, et al. Influence of braking conditions on tribological performance of copper-based powder metallurgical braking material. J Mater Eng Perform2018; 27: 4473–4480.
105.
IvanovaOWilliamsCCampbellT.Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyp J2013; 19: 353–364.
106.
KladovasilakisNPechlivaniEMSfampaIK, et al. Metal 3D-printed bioinspired lattice elevator braking pads for enhanced dynamic friction performance. Materials2024; 17: 2765.
107.
VasavaASinghD.Effect of different polygonal pins with scroll shoulder on microstructure, mechanical and tribological properties of hybrid surface composites of AA7075–T651/BN/WC. Phys Metals Metallogr2025; 126: 423–435.
108.
VasavaASinghD.Effect of different volume ratios of SiC and TiO2 reinforcement particles on mono and hybrid surface composites of AA7075-T651 through friction stir processing. J Adhes Sci Technol2023; 37: 3315–3334.
109.
VasavaASarvaiyaJKawareK.A review on surface composite through friction stir processing: processing parameters, reinforcement strategies and property enhancements. Weld Int2025; 1–28.
110.
ZhouYZhangYZhangX, et al. Effect of sintering temperature on the microstructure and mechanical and tribological properties of copper matrix composite for brake pads. Metals (Basel)2024; 14: 1048.
111.
VasavaASinghD.Comparative analysis of reinforcement addition techniques on fabricated hybrid surface composite of AA7075-T651/WC/BN through friction stir processing. J Adhes Sci Technol2024; 38: 2874–2896.
112.
VasavaASSinghD.Reinforcing material addition techniques in friction stir processing: a review. Mater Today Proc2022; 58: 184–190.
113.
VasavaASSinghD.Microhardness and microstructure of AA7075-T651/graphene surface composite through FSP. Mater Today Proc2022; 58: 140–145.
114.
ZhouWHongLWangY, et al. Effect of sintering temperature on microstructure and properties of nano-WC particle reinforced copper matrix composites prepared by hot-pressing sintering. Mater Res Express2020; 7: 126520.
115.
MakniFCristolA-LElleuchR, et al. Organic brake friction composite materials: Impact of mixing duration on microstructure, properties, tribological behavior and wear resistance. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 1692.
116.
FebrianiRAParkH-SLeeC-M.A rule-based system for quality control in brake disc production lines. Appl Sci2020; 10: 6565.
117.
YavuzHBayrakçekenHÇengelciE, et al. An investigation on the performance of vehicle brake pads developed from Cortaderia selloana based biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefin2025; 15: 5293–5302.
118.
AmmarZAdlyMAbdalakrimSYH, et al. Incorporating date palm fibers for sustainable friction composites in vehicle brakes. Sci Rep2024; 14: 23204.
119.
SandersPGXuNDalkaTM, et al. Airborne brake wear debris: size distributions, composition, and a comparison of dynamometer and vehicle tests. Environ Sci Technol2003; 37: 4060–4069.
120.
DimidukDMHolmEANiezgodaSR.Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov2018; 7: 157–172.
121.
MoosaviSMJablonkaKMSmitB.The role of machine learning in the understanding and design of materials. J Am Chem Soc2020; 142: 20273–20287.
122.
AleksendricDDubokaC.Artificial technologies in sustainable braking system development. Int J Veh Des2008; 46: 237–249.
123.
SongWParkJSeoH, et al. Reduction of brake emission by optimizing the curing condition for brake pads using an artificial neural network. Wear2023; 516–517: 204606.
124.
WangSYuZWangJ, et al. Research on CNN-LSTM brake pad wear condition monitoring based on GTO multi-objective optimization. Actuators2023; 12(7): 301.
125.
StenderMTiedemannMSpielerD, et al. Deep learning for brake squeal: brake noise detection, characterization and prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 149: 107181.
126.
KonadaNKOktemHOzA.Tribological and mechanical behavior of brake composite with ANN and TOPSIS. J Mater Eng Perform2025; 34: 1483–1500.
127.
QuamarDSarkarC.Modelling of performance parameters of phenolic base resins Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO) friction material in brake pad using machine learning algorithms. Tribol Int2024; 191: 109188.
128.
WuYZhangXNegiA, et al. Synergistic effects of boron nitride (BN) nanosheets and silver (Ag) nanoparticles on thermal conductivity and electrical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Polymers (Basel)2020; 12: 426.
129.
NandaTSinghKShellyD, et al. Advancements in multi-scale filler reinforced epoxy nanocomposites for improved impact strength: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci2021; 46: 281–329.
