Environmental sustainability is a crucial topic in the mobility industry, where manufacturers face severe legislative requirements to reduce cars’ environmental impacts. To address this, the paper presents a novel assessment approach for life-cycle emissions that aids designers in developing environmentally sustainable automotive products without compromising performance. The method compares different alternatives regarding materials, processes, and geometric parameters from both the performance and environmental perspectives. A Design of Experiments study is conducted to calculate specific objective indicators that indicate improvements or worsening in the design alternative. The Finite Element Method is used to simulate mechanical performance, the Life Cycle Assessment methodology is applied to evaluate the environmental impact of alternatives. An exterior roof component is used as exemplary study, and the most promising alternatives are classified using an aggregated score combining performance and environmental objectives. Additional load cases are used to ensure the suitability of these solutions.
MayyasAQattawiAOmarM, et al. Design for sustainability in automotive industry: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2012; 16(4): 1845–1862.
3.
JasinskiDMeredithJKirwanK.A comprehensive review of full cost accounting methods and their applicability to the automotive industry. J Clean Prod2015; 108: 1123–1139.
AndriankajaHValletFLe DuigouJ, et al. A method to ecodesign structural parts in the transport sector based on product life cycle management. J Clean Prod2015; 94: 165–176.
7.
PallaroESubramanianNAbdulrahmanMD, et al. Sustainable production and consumption in the automotive sector: integrated review framework and research directions. Sustain Prod Consumption2015; 4: 47–61.
8.
MacLeanHLLaveLB.Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Environ Sci Technol2003; 37(23): 5445–5452.
9.
DeloguMDel PeroFPieriniM.Lightweight design solutions in the automotive field: environmental modelling based on fuel reduction value applied to diesel turbocharged vehicles. Sustainability2016; 8(11): 1167.
10.
NessBUrbel-PiirsaluEAnderbergS, et al. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ2007; 60(3): 498–508.
11.
FauziRTLavoiePSorelliL, et al. Exploring the current challenges and opportunities of life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability2019; 11(3): 636.
12.
SalaSCiuffoBNijkampP.A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ2015; 119: 314–325.
13.
McArthurJWRasmussenK.Change of pace: accelerations and advances during the Millennium Development Goal Era. World Dev2018; 105: 132–143.
14.
Leal FilhoWTripathiSKAndrade GuerraJBSOD, et al. Using the Sustainable Development Goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2019; 26(2): 179–190.
15.
UNEP/SETAC. Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Paris, France: UNEP-SETAC, 2011.
16.
ZamagniAPesonenHLSwarrT.From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess2013; 18: 1637–1641.
17.
VisentinCTrentinAWDSBraunAB, et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment: a systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies. J Clean Prod2020; 270: 122509.
18.
CostaDQuinteiroPDiasAC.A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. Sci Total Environ2019; 686: 774–787.
19.
AruldossMLakshmiTMVenkatesanVP.A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am J Inf Syst2013; 1: 31–43.
20.
WangJJJingYYZhangCF, et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2009; 13: 2263–2278.
21.
OnatNCGumusSKucukvarM, et al. Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies. Sustain Prod Consumption2020; 6: 12–25.
22.
RousseauxPGremy-GrosCBonninM, et al. ‘Eco-Tool-Seeker’: a new and unique business guide for choosing ecodesign tools. J Clean Prod2017; 151: 546–577.
23.
RossiMGermaniMZamagniA.Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J Clean Prod2016; 129: 361–373.
24.
DengYGuoYWuP, et al. Optimal design of flax fiber reinforced polymer composite as a lightweight component for automobiles from a life cycle assessment perspective. J Indu Ecol2019; 23: 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12836
25.
SaadMHNazzalMADarrasBM. A general framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes. Ecolo Indic2019; 97: 211–224.
26.
DeloguMMalteseSDel PeroF, et al. Challenges for modelling and integrating environmental performances in concept design: the case of an automotive component lightweighting. Int J Sustain Eng2018; 11(2): 135–148.
27.
GhadimiPAzadniaAHMohd YusofN, et al. A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: a case study in automotive industry. J Clean Prod2012; 33: 10–21.
28.
SalvadoMAzevedoSMatiasJ, et al. Proposal of a sustainability index for the automotive industry. Sustainability2015; 7(2): 2113–2144.
29.
HapuwatteBSeeversKDBadurdeenF, et al. Total life cycle sustainability analysis of additively manufactured products. Procedia CIRP2016; 48: 376–381.
30.
AtilganBAzapagicA.An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy2016; 93: 168–186.
31.
OnatNCKucukvarMTatariO, et al. Combined application of multi-criteria optimization and life-cycle sustainability assessment for optimal distribution of alternative passenger cars in U.S. J Clean Prod2016; 112: 291–307.
32.
ZanchiL.Life cycle sustainability assessment: application to the automotive sector and challenges for the lightweighting, 2016.
33.
RussoDMatinaD.Structural optimization and LCA for a computer-aided sustainable design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Volume 2: 32nd computers and information in engineering conference, parts A and B, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–15 August 2012, pp.329–338. New York: ASME.
34.
RussoDRizziC.An eco-design approach based on structural optimization in a CAD framework. Comput Aided Des Appl2014; 11(5): 579–588.
35.
Fihri-FassiHOurihiRElahrachK.An integrated method involving design-manufacturing-environment applied in structural optimization. Mater Today Proc2021; 38(1): 135–138.
36.
KamalakkannanSKulatungaAK.Optimization of eco-design decisions using a parametric life cycle assessment. Sustain Prod Consumption2021; 27: 1297–1316.
37.
ReimerLKaluzaACerdasF, et al. Design of eco-efficient body parts for electric vehicles considering life cycle environmental information. Sustainability2020; 12(14): 5838.
38.
AshbyMF.Materials selection in mechanical design. 4th ed.Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.
39.
Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment: detailed guidance. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2011.
40.
ISO 14040/14044. Environmental management – Life Cycle Assessment – principals and framework/requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO, 2006.
41.
HiedererR; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment: provisions and action steps. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2011.
42.
Del PeroFBerziLAntonacciA, et al. Automotive lightweight design: simulation modeling of mass-related consumption for electric vehicles. Machines2020; 8(3): 51.
43.
Del PeroFDeloguMPieriniM. The effect of lightweighting in automotive LCA perspective: estimation of mass-induced fuel consumption reduction for gasoline turbocharged vehicles. J Clean Prod2017; 154: 566–577.
44.
AntonacciADel PeroFBaldanziniN, et al. Multi-objective methodology for design and environmental analysis in the automotive field. SAE Int J Mater Manuf2022; 15(4): 367–394.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
