Eco-design is a key trend in industry today. DCNS, a major French shipbuilder, has taken a position in this market thanks to a consortium of several concerned specialists: Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Ifremer, SITA Suez, and Bureau Veritas. The purpose is to create a tool to assess the impacts on the aquatic environment, but also an eco-design tool making it possible to improve design. Based on life cycle analysis (LCA) principles, it is improved by a specific eco-indicator for the maritime environment and the possibility of a return to design at the design stage. This tool is currently being developed by a computer engineer. The functionalities proposed and expected in the tool requirements are being tested by this development.
LagerstedtJ.Functional and environmental factors in early phases of product development – Eco functional matrix PhD Thesis, Trita-MMK, 2003.
2.
‘Guidelines for the development of the ship recycling plan.’ MEPC/Circ.419, 12 November 2004.
3.
‘Report of the world summit of sustainable development.’ Plan of implementation of World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August–4 September, 2002.
4.
International Standard Organisation. ISO 14040: 2006 (AFNOR) environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework (ISO2006)
5.
International Standard Organisation. ISO 14044: 2006 (AFNOR) environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines (ISO2006)
6.
International Standard Organisation. ISO 14062: 2002 (AFNOR) environmental management – integrating environmental aspects into product design and development (ISO2002)
7.
Le PochatS.Intégration de l'éco-conception dans les PME: proposition d'une méthode d'appropriation de savoir-faire pour la conception environnementale des produits PhD Thesis, ENSAM, Chambéry, 2005.
JaninM.Démarche d'éco-conception en entreprise. Un enjeu: construire la cohérence entre outils et processus PhD Thesis, ENSAM, Chambéry, 2000.
10.
BoeglinN.VeuilletD.‘Introduction à l'analyse de cycle de vie (ACV).’ Département Eco-conception and Consommation Durable/Direction Clients, Note de synthèse externe, May 2005.
11.
US Environmental Protection Agency and Science Applications International Corporation. ‘Introduction to LCA.’ LCAccess – LCA 101, 2001.
12.
GoedkoopM., SimaPro 7 – introduction into LCA, vol. 4.2, February 2008 (Pré Consultants)
13.
GoedkoopM.SpriensmaR., The Eco-indicator 99 – a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment – methodology annex3rd edition, 22 June 2001 (Pré Consultants)
14.
MilletD.BistagninoL.LanzavecchiaC.CamousR.PoldmaT.‘Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs?’J. Cleaner Prod.15 (4) (2007): 335–346
15.
ReapJ.RomanF.DuncanS.BrasB.‘A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis.’Int. J. Life Cycle Assessment13 (2008): 290–300 DOI 10.1007/s11367–008-0008-x.
16.
WinnesH.UlfvarsonA.‘Environmental improvements in ship design by the use of scoring functions.’Proc. IMechE, Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment220 (1) (2006): 29–39 DOI 10.1243/14750902JEME30.
17.
‘Convention internationale pour le contrôle et la gestion des eaux de ballast et sédiments des navires.’ Constitution du 4 Octobre 1958, Treizième Législature Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée Nationale JO n 119 du 23 May 2008, 8 April 2008.
18.
Lloyd's. New openings quantifying opportunities in Asia.’ Lloyd's report, London, 2000.
19.
FagnentM.MarcadeJ.‘Développement d'outils d'éco-conception pour les navires militaires civils.’ Rapport de Stage, ENSAM, Chambéry, June 2008.
20.
HermannB. G.KroezeC.JawjitW.‘Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performances indicators.’J. Cleaner Prod.15 (18) (2007): 1787–1796
21.
HarscoetE.FroelichD.‘Use of LCA to evaluate the environmental benefits of substituting chromic acid anodizing (CAA)’J. Cleaner Prod.16 (12) (2007): 1294–1305
22.
DreyerL.NiemannA.HauschildM.‘Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99: does it matter which one you choose?’Int. J. LCA8 (4) (2003): 191–200
23.
HuijbregsM.‘Priority assessment of toxic substances in the frame of LCA.’Development and application of the multimedia fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA. Milieukunde, University of Amsterdam, May 1999.
24.
BrandesL. J.Den HollanderH.Van De MeentD., SimpleBox 2.0: a nested multimedia fate model for evaluating the environmental fate of chemicals. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, RIVM report no. 719101029, December 1996.
Towards sustainable development: environmental indicators, 1998 (OECD Publishing, Paris).
27.
MichelJ.HayesM. O.Sensitivity of coastal environments and wildlife to spilled oil: Hudson River BIRDS (Bird Polygons), 2005 (Office of Response and Restoration, NOAA's National Ocean Service
