The non-volatile particle emission characteristics of alternative (rapeseed methyl ester and gas-to-liquid) diesel fuel blends were studied through an experimental investigation carried out on a light-duty common-rail diesel engine. A blend ratio of 10 vol % was chosen as the practical limit for biodiesels in this study, and the research focus was on the particle number concentration and size distribution with various injection strategies, in which the non-volatile emissions were measured using thermodilution. The particle morphology and mass, together with the related gaseous emissions, were measured and analysed. The results indicate that, without any engine modification, adding selected alternative fuels even at a low percentage could result in a favourable reduction in the number of particles and in a significant reduction in the total particle concentration in both the nucleation mode and the accumulation mode. The particle emissions of the three fuels demonstrated monomodal size distributions under most engine conditions tested, except for the engine idling case, which produced a bimodal size distribution. The influence of 10 vol % rapeseed methyl ester or gas-to-liquid diesel blends on the carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide emissions is not significant. Nevertheless, using these diesel fuel blends may increase the total hydrocarbon emissions and may lead to high particulate matter emissions.
FIE manufacturers. Fatty acid methyl ester fuels as a replacement or extender for diesel fuels, Diesel fuel injection equipment manufacturers common position statement, http://www.isuzuengines.com/pdf/FIE_FAME_Position.pdf (2007). Access on 8/May/2014.
KousoulidouMFontarasGNtziachristosL. Evaluation of biodiesel blends on the performance and emissions of a common-rail light-duty engine and vehicle. SAE paper 2009-01-0692, 2009.
6.
NwaforOMI. Emission characteristics of diesel engine operating on rapeseed methyl ester. Renewable Energy2004; 29: 119–129.
7.
YoshidaKTaniguchiSKitanoK. Effects of RME30 on exhaust emissions and combustion in a diesel engine. SAE paper 2008-01-2499, 2008.
8.
MendeTAndoRNagataM. Detailed analysis of particulate matter emitted from biofueled diesel combustion with high EGR. SAE paper 2009-01-0483, 2009.
9.
LiuDXuHTianJ. Cold and warm start characteristics using HVO and RME blends in a V6 diesel engine. SAE paper 2013-01-1306, 2013.
10.
CzerwinskiJDimopoulos EggenschwilerPHeebA. Diesel emissions with DPF & SCR and toxic potentials with biodiesel (RME) blend fuels. SAE paper 2013-01-0523, 2013.
11.
NapolitanoPGuidoCBeatriceCDi BlasioG. Study of the effect of the engine parameters calibration to optimize the use of bio-ethanol/RME/diesel blend in a Euro5 light duty diesel engine. SAE paper 2013-01-1695, 2013.
TsujimuraTGotoSMatsubaraH. A study of PM emission characteristics of diesel vehicle fueled with GTL. SAE paper 2007-01-0028, 2007.
14.
KitanoKMisawaSMoriM. GTL fuel impact on DI diesel emissions. SAE paper 2007-01-2004, 2007.
15.
SchabergPBothaJSchnellM. Emissions performance of GTL diesel fuel and blends with optimized engine calibrations. SAE paper 2005-01-2187, 2005.
16.
OgumaMGotoSChenZ. Fuel characteristics evaluation of GTL for DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2004-01-0088, 2004.
17.
HajbabaeiMJohnsonKOkamotoRDurbinT. Evaluation of the impacts of biofuels on emissions for a California certified diesel fuel from heavy-duty engines. SAE paper 2013-01-1138, 2013.
18.
MilloFMallamoFVlachosT. Experimental investigation on the effects on performance and emissions of an automotive Euro 5 diesel engine fuelled with B30 from RME and HVO. SAE paper 2013-01-1679, 2013.
19.
HadaviSLiHPrzybylaG. Comparison of gaseous emissions for B100 and diesel fuels for real world urban and extra urban driving. SAE paper 2012-01-1674, 2012.
20.
KitanoKMisawaSMoriM. GTL fuel impact on DI diesel emissions. JSAE paper20077188, 2007.
21.
ManasraSBrueggemannD. Effect of split injection on the combustion and in-cylinder soot formation characteristics of low compression ratio neat gas-to-liquid-fueled DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2012-01-0690, 2012.
22.
ManasraSBrueggemannD. Effect of injection pressure and timing on the in-cylinder soot formation characteristics of low CR neat GTL-fueled DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2011-01-2464, 2011.
23.
OgumaMGotoSChenZ. Fuel characteristics evaluation of GTL for DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2004-01-0088, 2004.
24.
KittelsonDB. Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Sci1997; 29: 575–588.
25.
EastwoodP. Particulate emissions from vehicles. New York: John Wiley, 2008.
26.
YuanWHansenACZhangQ. Vapor pressure and normal boiling point predictions for pure methyl esters and biodiesel fuels. Fuel2005; 84:943–950.
27.
HeywoodJB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
28.
BadamiMMilloFD’AmatoD. Experimental investigation on soot and NOx formation in a DI common-rail diesel engine with pilot injection. SAE paper 2001-01-0657, 2001.
29.
KasperM. The number concentration of non-volatile particles – design study for an instrument according to the PMP recommendations. SAE paper 2004-01-0960, 2004.
30.
LiHLea-LangtonAAndrewsG. Comparison of exhaust emissions and particulate size distribution for diesel, biodiesel and cooking oil from a heavy duty DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2008-01-0076, 2008.
31.
BikaAFranklinLKittelsonD. Emissions effects of hydrogen as a supplemental fuel with diesel and biodiesel. SAE paper 2008-01-0648, 2008.
32.
ZhangXWangHLiL. Characteristics of particulates and exhaust gases emissions of DI diesel engine employing common rail fuel system fueled with bio-diesel blends. SAE paper 2008-01-1834, 2008.
33.
MoonGLeeYChoiKJeongD. Experimental study on characteristics of diesel particulate emissions with diesel, GTL, and blended fuels. SAE paper 2009-24-0098, 2009.
34.
PariharASethiVParikhP. Physical characterization of particulate emissions from compression ignition engine operating on diesel and biodiesel fuels. SAE paper 2011-26-0026, 2011.
35.
De FilippoACiaravinoCMilloF. Particle number, size and mass emissions of different biodiesel blends versus ULSD from a small displacement automotive diesel engine. SAE paper 2011-01-0633, 2011.
36.
SongHLeeMKangHKimK. The effects of oxidation deterioration biodiesel on particulate emission from heavy duty diesel engine. SAE paper 2012-01-1600, 2012.
37.
SrivastavaDAgarwalAGuptaT. Particulate characterization of biodiesel fuelled compression ignition engine. SAE paper 2009-28-0018, 2009.
38.
NuszkowskiJFlaimKThompsonG. The Effect of Cetane Improvers and Biodiesel on Diesel Particulate Matter Size. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 4(1): 23–33, 2011.
39.
MancarusoEVagliecoBCiaravinoC. Combustion analysis in an optical diesel engine operating with low compression ratio and biodiesel fuels. SAE paper 2010-01-0865, 2010.
40.
LapuertaMArmasORodríguez-FernándezJ. Effect of the degree of unsaturation of biodiesel fuels on NOx and particulate emissions. SAE paper 2008-01-1676, 2008.
41.
LeeSJangYKimT. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with pyrolysis oil–ethanol blend with diesel and biodiesel pilot injection. SAE paper 2013-01-2671, 2013.
42.
TorvelaTTissariJSippulaO. Effect of wood combustion conditions on the morphology of freshly emitted fine particles. Atmos Environ2014; 87: 65–76.
43.
IsmailBEwingDChangJ. Development of a non-destructive neutron radiography technique to measure the three-dimensional soot deposition profiles in diesel engine exhaust systems. J Aerosol Sci2004; 35(10): 1275–1288.
44.
HeXMaXWuF. Investigation of soot formation in laminar diesel diffusion flame by two-colour laser induced incandescence.SAE paper 2008-01-1064, 2008.
45.
XuF. Experimental research on particulate matter emissions from gasoline direct injection engines. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, 2012.
46.
ZhangJ. Particle matter emission control and related issues for diesel engines. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 2011.
