The study presents transmissibility responses of 14 male subjects exposed to vertical sinusoidal vibration (2.0–16.0 Hz) at five vibration magnitudes (0.5–1.5 m s−2 r.m.s.). The vibration magnitudes are measured at five body locations: head (at the forehead), sternum, abdomen, thigh, and leg, for which the transmissibility at each body location is statistically analyzed. The nonlinearity in the transmissibility response, that is, decrease in resonance frequency with an increase in vibration magnitude, is evident for the sternum, abdomen, thigh, and leg. The higher vibration magnitude causes greater segmental transmissibility at excitation frequency lower than the resonance frequency. The highest vibration transmissibility has been observed for the abdomen, followed by the thigh, sternum, and head. The findings indicate that the higher energy content associated with the sinusoidal waveform further softens the tissues in contact with the vibrating surface.
Practitioner Summary: The present study provides transmissibility responses of the semi-supine posture of humans at the head, sternum, abdomen, thigh, and leg under vertical sinusoidal excitation (2.0–16.0 Hz). Pronounced transmissibility is obtained for the abdomen among the other body segments, followed by the thigh, as both consist of a majority of soft tissues.
HolmlundPLundströmR.Mechanical impedance of the sitting human body in single-axis compared to multi-axis whole-body vibration exposure. Clin Biomech2001; 16 Suppl1(1): S101–S110.
3.
MatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Non-linear characteristics in the dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. J Biomech Eng2002; 124(5): 527–532.
4.
MansfieldNJLundströmR.The apparent mass of the human body exposed to non-orthogonal horizontal vibration. J Biomech1999; 32: 1269–1278.
5.
MansfieldNJGriffinMJ.Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. J Biomech2000; 33(8): 933–941.
6.
SubashiGHMatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Apparent mass and cross-axis apparent mass of standing subjects during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib2006; 293(1–2): 78–95.
7.
GovindanRPrakash HarshaS.Effect of low-frequency vibration on human body in standing position exposed to railway vehicle. Int J Veh Struct Syst2018; 10(3): 10.
8.
MatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Dynamic response of the standing human body exposed to vertical vibration: influence of posture and vibration magnitude. J Sound Vib1998; 212(1): 85–107.
9.
HolmlundPLundströmRLindbergL.Mechanical impedance of the human body in vertical direction. Appl Ergon2000; 31(4): 415–422.
10.
DesaiRGuhaASeshuP.Multibody modelling of the human body for vibration induced direct and cross-axis seat to head transmissibility. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235: 3146–3161.
11.
HuangYGriffinMJ.Nonlinearity in apparent mass and transmissibility of the supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib2009; 324(1–2): 429–452.
12.
HuangYGriffinMJ.Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during longitudinal horizontal whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib2008; 312(1–2): 273–295.
13.
HuangYGriffinMJ.Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib [Internet]2008; 312(1–2): 296–315.
14.
HuangYGriffinMJ.Effect of voluntary periodic muscular activity on nonlinearity in the apparent mass of the seated human body during vertical random whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib2006; 298(3): 824–840.
15.
WangYRahmatallaS.Three-dimensional modeling of supine human and transport system under whole-body vibration. J Biomech Eng2013; 135(6): 61010–61013.
16.
ClarkWSLangeKOCoermannRR.Deformation of the human body due to uni-directional forced sinusoidal vibration. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc1962; 4(5): 255–274.
17.
MeuschJRahmatallaS.Whole-body vibration transmissibility in supine humans: effects of board litter and neck collar. Appl Ergon2014; 45(3): 677–685.
18.
ZhouZGriffinMJ.Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: biodynamic responses to sinusoidal and random vibration. Ergonomics2014; 57(5): 693–713.
19.
NarayanamoorthyRHuzur SaranV.Error analysis of task performance with laptop in vibration environment. Comput Human Behav2011; 27(6): 2263–2270.
20.
SahaSLakesRS.The effect of soft tissue on wave-propagation and vibration tests for determining the in vivo properties of bone. J Biomech1977; 10: 393–401.
21.
NokesLFaircloughJAMintowt-CzyzWJ, et al. Vibration analysis of human tibia: the effect of soft tissue on the output from skin-mounted accelerometers. J Biomech Eng1984; 6: 223–226.
22.
ZiegertJCLewisJL.The effect of soft tissue on measurements of vibrational bone motion by skin-mounted accelerometers. J Biomech Eng1979; 101: 218–220.
23.
ValiantGAMcMahonTAFrederickEC.New test to evaluate the cushioning properties of athletic shoes. In: JohnssonB (ed.) Biomechanics X. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1987, pp.937–941.
24.
HinzBSeidelHBräuerD, et al. Examination of spinal column vibrations: a non-invasive approach. Eur J Appl Physiol1988; 57: 707–713.
25.
KitazakiSGriffinMJ.A data correction method for surface measurement of vibration on the human body. J Biomech1995; 28(7): 885–890.
26.
SmeathersJE.Measurement of transmissibility for the human spine during walking and running. Clin Biomech1989; 4: 34–40.
27.
PraneshA.Experimental and analytical study of transmission of whole body vibration to segments of the seated human body. PhD Thesis, Concordia University, 2011.
GriffinMJWhithamEMParsonsKC.Vibration and comfort I. Translational seat vibration. Ergonomics1982; 25(7): 603–630.
30.
RahmatallaSKinslerRQiaoG, et al. Effect of gender, stature, and body mass on immobilized supine human response during en route care transport. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control2021; 40: 3–17.
31.
WięckowskiD.An attempt to estimate natural frequencies of parts of the child’s body. Arch Automot Eng2012; 55: 61–74.
32.
KobayashiFNakagawaTKanadaS, et al. Measurement of human head vibration. Ind Health1981; 19: 191–201.
33.
PaddanGSGriffinMJ.The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head—I. Vertical seat vibration. J Biomech1988; 21(3): 191–197.
34.
MatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Comparison of biodynamic responses in standing and seated human bodies. J Sound Vib2000; 238(4): 691–704.
35.
AdelsteinBDBeutterBRKaiserMK, et al. Effects of transverse seat vibration on near-viewing readability of alphanumeric symbology. Report No. 2009-215385. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
36.
MiwaT.Mechanical impedance of human body in various postures. Ind Health1975; 13(1–2): 1–22.
37.
ZhouZGriffinMJ.Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by mechanical shocks. Ergonomics2017; 60(3): 347–357.
38.
GovindanRSaranVHHarshaSP.Low-frequency vibration analysis of human body in semi-supine posture exposed to vertical excitation. Eur J Mech - A/Solids2020; 80: 103906.
39.
LiuCQiuY.Nonlinearity in the localised apparent masses of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 135: 106394.
40.
NaderM.The impact of vibration and noise in the technical means of transport on the human body. Publishing House of Warsaw University of Technology. 2000.
41.
Kromka-SzydekMDziechciowskiZTyrpinP.Preliminary assessment of vibration impacts generated by the public transport systems on pregnant women based on subjective reactions. Acta Bioeng Biomech2018; 20(1): 79–92.
