The Transmission of Vibration to the Occupants of a Car Seat with a Suspended Back-Rest

Abstract

A new type of car seat has been designed in which the back-rest is able to move freely in the vertical direction. The design allows the back-rest to follow the vertical vibration of the back of an occupant of the seat. This is intended to decrease any strain on the lumbar part of the spinal column caused by a different vertical motion at the seat squab and the seat back. The transmission of vertical (z axis) vibration from the base of this seat to the seat surface, to the back-rest and to the backs and heads of seat occupants has been measured. Measurements were made with the seat back fixed, to prevent vertical motion relative to the seat frame, and with the seat back free to move.

Vibration transmissibilities from the seat base to the seat surface were characterized by a resonance at frequencies in the region of 4 Hz. The resonance frequencies were slightly higher with the fixed back-rest than with the moving back-rest. The transmissibilities at frequencies above 4 Hz were generally higher with the fixed back-rest. Measurements with no contact between the seat occupants and the seat back indicated that the dynamic properties of the human body and the seat cushion were less influenced by the moving seat back than by the fixed seat back. Differential motion between the seat surface and seat back was smaller with the moving seat back than with the fixed back.

Keywords

seat design ride comfort whole-body vibration seat transmissibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Griffin

M. J.

Handbook of human vibration, 1990 (Academic Press, London).

Hulshof

Van Zanten

B. V.

Whole-body vibration and low-back pain: a review of epidemiologic studies. Int. Archs Occup. and Environmental Health, 1987, 59, 205–220.

Gouw

G. J.

Rakheja

Sankar

Afework

Increased comfort and safety of drivers of off-highway vehicles with optimal seat suspension. SAE Trans., J. Commercial Vehicles, 1990, 99(2), 541–548.

Burdoff

Swuste

The effect of seat suspension on exposure to whole-body vibration of professional drivers. Ann. Occup. Hygiene, 1993, 37(1), 45–55.

Haffer

Dupuis

Untersuchungen an einem neuartigen autositz. Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, 1965, 67/9, 289–292.

Griffin

M. J.

Parsons

K. C.

Whitham

E. M.

Vibration and comfort IV. Application of experimental results. Ergonomics, 1982, 25(8), 721–739.

BS 6841: 1987. British standard guide to the measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock (British Standards Institution, London).

Johnson

D. A.

Samin

J. C.

Nève

A new design of vehicle seat intended to alleviate lower back pain. J. Biomech. Engng, 1989, 111, 261–262.

Nève

Johnson

Samin

J. C.

Lumbar strains due to car driving: Analysis, measurements and prevention. Annales de Kinesitherapie, 1992, 19(6), 327–332.

10.

Devices for use in defining and measuring vehicle seating accommodation. SAE Standard J826b, 1978 (Society of Automotive Engineers).

11.

Pheasant

Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and design, 1986 (Taylor and Francis, London).

12.

ISO 10326–1: 1992 (E) Mechanical vibration—laboratory method for evaluating seat vibration—Part 1: Basic requirements (International Organization for Standardization).

13.

Kitazaki

Griffin

M. J.

A data correction method for surface measurement of vibration on the human body. J. Biomechanics, 1995, 28(7), 885–890.

14.

Griffin

M. J.

Lewis

C. H.

Parsons

K. C.

Whitham

E. M.

The biodynamic response of the human body and its application to standards. AGARD Conference on Model and analogues for the evaluation of human biodynamic response, performance and protection, Paris, 1978, paper A28, AGARD Conference Proceedings CP-253, 1979 (H. E. von Gierke, Germany).