The contact pressure distribution computation model was established to evaluate the internal and external sealing performance of packer rubber. And the results show that the internal sealing performance of packer rubber may be lower than the external side. The weights of the key parameters which influence the internal and external sealing performance of the rubber tube are obtained by calculation. The optimized structural parameters are obtained by genetic algorithm, and the sealing performance is increased by 21%. The research work is significant to improve the packer’s sealing performance and adapt deep shale gas wells ultra-high pressure fracturing conditions.
HeZLiSNieH, et al.The shale gas “sweet window”: “the cracked and unbroken” state of shale and its depth range. Mar Pet Geology2019; 101: 334–342.
2.
HuangYLiYZhaoH, et al.Research on constitutive models of hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber for packer at different temperatures. J Mech Sci Technol2020; 34(1): 155–164.
3.
ZhangFJiangXWangH, et al.Mechanical analysis of sealing performance for compression packer rubber tube. Mech Industry2018; 19(3): 309.
4.
ShimVPWYangLMLimCT, et al.A visco-hyperelastic constitutive model to characterize both tensile and compressive behavior of rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 92(1): 523–531.
5.
LiuZLiSZhangL, et al.Analysis of sealing mechanical properties of fracturing packer under complex conditions. J Fail Anal Prev2019; 19(6): 1569–1582.
6.
WangZCLvFXCaoMY, et al.Research on experimental method for the working force between packer rubber and casing tube. Appl Mech Mater2014; 518: 138–143.
7.
ZhuDLinYZhangH, et al.Corrosion evaluation of packer rubber materials in CO2 injection wells under supercritical conditions. J Pet Sci Eng2017; 151: 311–317.
8.
QamarSZPervezTAkhtarM, et al.Design and manufacture of swell packers: influence of material behavior. Mater Manufacturing Process2012; 27(7): 721–726.
9.
WangJNWuGXieWY, et al.Analysis of packer rubber mechanics properties. Adv Mater Res2014; 971-973: 380–389.
10.
ZhengCZhengXQinJ, et al.Nonlinear finite element analysis on the sealing performance of rubber packer for hydraulic fracturing. J Nat Gas Sci Eng2021; 85: 103711.
11.
AtkinsonCDesrochesJEftaxiopoulosDA, et al.Wellbore stresses induced by the nonlinear deformation of an inflatable packer. J Eng Maths2001; 41(4): 305–327.
12.
LiTMuLWangXD, et al.Contact stress analysis of packer rubber based on ANSYS software. Adv Mater Res2014; 860: 2966–2969.
13.
DongLLiKLiB, et al.Study in deep shale gas well to prevent shoulder protruding packer with high pressure sealing. Eng Fail Anal2020; 118: 104871.
14.
HuGZhangPWangG, et al.The influence of rubber material on sealing performance of packing element in compression packer. J Nat Gas Sci Eng2017; 38: 120–138.
15.
MaWQuBGuanF. Effect of the friction coefficient for contact pressure of packer rubber. Proc Inst Mech Eng C: J Mech Eng Sci2014; 228(16): 2881–2887.
16.
ZhangFShuiHYangJ-M. Sealing performance and fatigue life of the fracturing packer rubber of various materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2019; 233(17): 6157–6166.
17.
LanWJWangHXZhangX, et al.Sealing properties and structure optimization of packer rubber under high pressure and high temperature. Pet Sci2019; 16(03): 632–644.
18.
Al-KharusiMSMQamarSZPervezT, et al.Non-linear model for evaluation of elastomer seals subjected to differential pressure. In: SPE/DGS Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 15–18 May 2011, SPE-149032-MS.
19.
TreloarLRG. The physics of rubber elasticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
20.
OgdenRW. Recent advances in the phenomenological theory of rubber elasticity. Rubber Chem Technol1986; 59(3): 361–383.
21.
RivlinRS. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci1948; 241(835): 379–397.
22.
YeohOH. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol1993; 66(5): 754–771.
23.
DongLLiKZhuX, et al.Study on high temperature sealing behavior of packer rubber tube based on thermal aging experiments. Eng Fail Anal2020; 108: 104321.
24.
ChenX. Design and analysis of sealing mechanism of compression packer. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2015. (in Chinese).
25.
WojciechowskiMLefikM. On the static nature of minimal kinematic boundary conditions for computational homogenisation. Eng Trans2016; 64(4): 581–587.
26.
KathavateVSAmudhaKAdithyaL, et al.Mechanical behavior of composite materials for marine applications–an experimental and computational approach. J Mech Beh Mater2018; 27(1–2): 22.
27.
KathavateVSPawarDNAdkineAS. Micromechanics-based approach for the effective estimation of the elastic properties of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite. J Micromechanics Mol Phys2019; 04(03): 1950005.
28.
LiN. Seal performance research of the compressed sealing rubber of the packer. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2012. (in Chinese).
