In this work, the flank wear of the cutting tool is predicted using artificial neural network based on the responses of cutting force and surface roughness. EN8 steel is chosen as a work piece material and turning test is conducted with various levels of speed, feed and depth of cut. Cutting force and surface roughness are measured for both the fresh and dull tool under dry cutting conditions. The tool insert used is CNMG 120408 grade, TiN coated cemented carbide tool. The experiments are conducted based on the response surface methodology face central composite design of experiments. The feed rate (14.52%), depth of cut (27.72%) and the interaction of feed rate and depth of cut (50.39%) influence the cutting force. The feed rate (21.33%) and the interaction of cutting speed and depth of cut (26.67%) influence the flank wear. The feed rate (61.63%) has the significant influence on surface roughness. The feed forward back propagation neural network of 5-n-1 architecture is trained using the algorithms like Levenberg Marquardt, BFGS quasi-Newton, and Gradient Descent with Momentum and Gradient descent with adaptive learning rate. The network performance has been assessed based on their mean square error and computation time. From this analysis, the BFGS quasi-Newton back propagation algorithm produced the least mean squared error value with minimum computation time.
RaoKVMurthyBRaoNM. Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network. Measurement2014; 51: 63–70.
2.
KumarRChauhanS. Study on surface roughness measurement for turning of Al 7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites by using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networking (ANN). Measurement2015; 65: 166–180.
3.
AgrawalAGoelSRashidWB, et al.Prediction of surface roughness during hard turning of AISI 4340 steel (69 HRC). Appl Soft Comput2015; 30: 279–286.
4.
RaoKVMurthyP. Modeling and optimization of tool vibration and surface roughness in boring of steel using RSM, ANN and SVM. J Intell Manuf2018; 29: 1533–1543.
5.
DasSRDhupalDKumarA. Study of surface roughness and flank wear in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel with coated ceramic inserts. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 4329–4340.
6.
MaherIEltaibMSarhanAA, et al.Cutting force-based adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for accurate surface roughness prediction in end milling operation for intelligent machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 76: 1459–1467.
7.
KarkalosNGalanisNMarkopoulosA. Surface roughness prediction for the milling of Ti–6Al–4V ELI alloy with the use of statistical and soft computing techniques. Measurement2016; 90: 25–35.
8.
DrouilletCKarandikarJNathC, et al.Tool life predictions in milling using spindle power with the neural network technique. J Manuf Process2016; 22: 161–168.
9.
KaraFAslantaşKCicekA. Prediction of cutting temperature in orthogonal machining of AISI 316L using artificial neural network. Appl Soft Comput2016; 38: 64–74.
10.
MiaMDharNR. Response surface and neural network based predictive models of cutting temperature in hard turning. J Adv Res2016; 7: 1035–1044.
11.
BouachaKTerrabA. Hard turning behavior improvement using NSGA-II and PSO-NN hybrid model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 86: 3527–3546.
12.
JurkovicZCukorGBrezocnikM, et al.A comparison of machine learning methods for cutting parameters prediction in high speed turning process. J Intell Manuf2018; 29: 1683–1693.
13.
RaoKVVidhuKKumarTA, et al.An artificial neural network approach to investigate surface roughness and vibration of workpiece in boring of AISI1040 steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 83: 919–927.
14.
PatraKJhaASzalayT, et al.Artificial neural network based tool condition monitoring in micro mechanical peck drilling using thrust force signals. Precis Eng2017; 48: 279–291.
15.
KamruzzamanMRahmanSSAshrafMZI, et al.Modeling of chip–tool interface temperature using response surface methodology and artificial neural network in HPC-assisted turning and tool life investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 90: 1547–1568.
16.
KhorasaniAYazdiMRS. Development of a dynamic surface roughness monitoring system based on artificial neural networks (ANN) in milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 93: 141–151.
17.
MiaMRaziMHAhmadI, et al.Effect of time-controlled MQL pulsing on surface roughness in hard turning by statistical analysis and artificial neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 91: 3211–3223.
18.
PimenovDYBustilloAMikolajczykT. Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth. J Intell Manuf2018; 29(5): 1045–1061.
19.
ParidaAKMaityK. Modeling of machining parameters affecting flank wear and surface roughness in hot turning of Monel-400 using response surface methodology (RSM). Measurement2019; 137: 375–381.
20.
PatelVDGandhiAH. Analysis and modeling of surface roughness based on cutting parameters and tool nose radius in turning of AISI D2 steel using CBN tool. Measurement2019; 138: 34–38.
21.
KeneAPChoudhurySK. Analytical modeling of tool health monitoring system using multiple sensor data fusion approach in hard machining. Measurement2019; 145: 118–129.
22.
KahaniMAhmadiMHTatarA, et al.Development of multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) models to predict Nusselt number and pressure drop of TiO2/water nanofluid flows through non-straight pathways. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A2018; 74: 1190–1206.
23.
MaddahHAghayariRAhmadiMHRahimzadehM, et al.Prediction and modeling of MWCNT/Carbon (60/40)/SAE 10 W 40/SAE 85 W 90 (50/50) nanofluid viscosity using artificial neural network (ANN) and self-organizing map (SOM). J Therm Anal Calorim2018; 134: 2275–2286.
24.
AhmadiMHTatarANazariMA, et al.Applicability of connectionist methods to predict thermal resistance of pulsating heat pipes with ethanol by using neural networks. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2018; 126: 1079–1086.
25.
BaghbanAKahaniMNazariMA, et al.Sensitivity analysis and application of machine learning methods to predict the heat transfer performance of CNT/water nanofluid flows through coils. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2019; 128: 825–835.
26.
PatelVDGandhiAH. Modeling of cutting forces considering progressive flank wear in finish turning of hardened AISI D2 steel with CBN tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019.
27.
AhmadiMHMohseni-GharyehsafaBFarzaneh-GordM, et al.Applicability of connectionist methods to predict dynamic viscosity of silver/water nanofluid by using ANN-MLP, MARS and MPR algorithms. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2019; 13: 220–228.
28.
MaddahHGhazviniMAhmadiMH. Predicting the efficiency of CuO/water nanofluid in heat pipe heat exchanger using neural network. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2019; 104: 33–40.
29.
KumarRSahooAKMishraPC, et al.ANN modeling of cutting performances in spray cooling assisted hard turning. Mater Today Proc2018; 5: 18482–18488.
30.
DeshpandeYVAndhareABPadolePM. Application of ANN to estimate surface roughness using cutting parameters, force, sound and vibration in turning of Inconel 718. SN Appl Sci2018; 1: 104.
31.
MeddourIYalleseMABensouilahH, et al.Prediction of surface roughness and cutting forces using RSM, ANN, and NSGA-II in finish turning of AISI 4140 hardened steel with mixed ceramic tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 97: 1931–1949.
32.
SahuNKAndhareABAndhaleS, et al.Prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti-6Al-4V using cutting parameters, forces and tool vibration. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2018; 346: 012037.
33.
LabidiATebassiHBelhadiS, et al.Cutting conditions modeling and optimization in hard turning using RSM, ANN and desirability function. J Fail Anal Prev2018; 18: 1017–1033.
34.
LaouissiAYalleseMABelbahA, et al.Investigation, modeling, and optimization of cutting parameters in turning of gray cast iron using coated and uncoated silicon nitride ceramic tools. Based on ANN, RSM, and GA optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 101: 523–548.
35.
BouachaKYalleseMAMabroukiT, et al.Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater2010; 28: 349–361.
36.
Abhang LB and Hameedullah M. Modeling and analysis of tool wear based on cutting force and chip-tool interface temperatures in turning. In: Antony K and Davim JP (eds) Advanced manufacturing and materials science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp.411–420.
37.
FanYHaoZZhengM, et al.Wear characteristics of cemented carbide tool in dry-machining Ti-6Al-4V. Mach Sci Technol2016; 20: 249–261.
38.
BhuiyanMSHChoudhuryIA. Investigation of tool wear and surface finish by analyzing vibration signals in turning Assab-705 steel. Mach Sci Technol2015; 19: 236–261.
39.
KacalAYıldırımF. Application of grey relational analysis in high-speed machining of hardened AISI D6 steel. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2013; 227: 1566–1576.
40.
ZertiAYalleseMAZertiO, et al.Prediction of machining performance using RSM and ANN models in hard turning of martensitic stainless steel AISI 420. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233(13).
41.
PandaADasSRDhupalD, et al.Hard turning of HSLA steel with coated ceramic tool based on evaluation of surface roughness, tool wear, chip morphology and economic analysis. J Manuf Technol Res2018; 10: 113–141.
42.
YücelEGünayM. Modelling and optimization of the cutting conditions in hard turning of high-alloy white cast iron (Ni-Hard). Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2013; 227: 2280–2290.
43.
GünayMKorkutIAslanE, et al.Experimental investigation of the effect of cutting tool rake angle on main cutting force. J Mater Process Technol2005; 166: 44–49.
44.
KountanyaRAl-ZkeriIAltanT. Effect of tool edge geometry and cutting conditions on experimental and simulated chip morphology in orthogonal hard turning of 100Cr6 steel. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5068–5076.
45.
ShankarSThangarasuSMohanrajT, et al.Prediction of cutting force in turning process: an experimental and fuzzy approach. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2015; 28(4): 1785–1793.
46.
ThangarasuSShankarSThomasAT, et al.Prediction of cutting force in turning process – an experimental approach. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2018, pp. 012119.
47.
ShankarSMohanrajTRajasekarR. Prediction of cutting tool wear during milling process using artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Comput Integr Manuf2019; 32: 174–182.
48.
TeimouriRAminiS. Forward and reverse mapping of multiresponses turning process using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and simulated annealing algorithm. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232: 1746–1758.
49.
MiaMMorshedMSKharshiduzzamanM, et al.Prediction and optimization of surface roughness in minimum quantity coolant lubrication applied turning of high hardness steel. Measurement2018; 118: 43–51.
50.
ShankarSMohanrajTThangarasuSK. Multi-response milling process optimization using the Taguchi method coupled to grey relational analysis. Mater Test2016; 58: 462–470.
51.
KumarNSShettyAShettyA, et al.Effect of spindle speed and feed rate on surface roughness of carbon steels in CNC turning. Procedia Eng2012; 38: 691–697.
