Dynamic analysis of a mechanism with clearance joints and flexible links is a research focus in the field of multibody dynamics. In this study, a general modular dynamic modeling approach based on Lagrange multiplier method for planar closed-loop mechanisms is proposed in order to improve the modeling efficiency and reusability of a structure having same topology. With this approach, dynamic analysis considering clearance joints and flexible links can be performed conveniently. A novel mathematical model to determine the relative motion modes between the two components of a clearance joint is developed based on the previous contact detection method. A complete dynamic effect evaluation system, which measures the influence of clearance joints and flexible links on the dynamic performances more conveniently and intuitively, is established. A planar 3-RRR parallel mechanism that is a closed-loop system including imperfect joints and flexible links is studied as an example. The dynamic model of this mechanism is established and its dynamic characteristics are investigated. The couple effects of clearance joints and flexible links for a parallel mechanism are investigated first. The contact forces existing in the clearance joints can cause system vibration and thus reduces the dynamic stability of the whole mechanical system. Meanwhile, the simulation results indicate that the flexible links can damp the vibration of the moving platform caused by clearance joints is certain.
KüblerRSchiehlenW. Modular simulation in multibody system dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn2000; 4: 107–127.
2.
SahaSKSchiehlenWO. Recursive kinematics and dynamics for parallel structured closed-loop multibody systems. Mech Struct Mach2001; 29: 143–175.
3.
KhanWAKroviVNSahaSK. Modular and recursive kinematics and dynamics for parallel manipulators. Multibody Syst Dyn2005; 14: 419–455.
4.
HaoWGenliangCZhongqinL. Forward dynamics analysis of the 6-PUS mechanism based on platform-legs composite simulation. Chin J Mech Eng2009; 22: 496–504.
5.
SeneviratneLDEarlesSFennerDN. Analysis of a four-bar mechanism with a radially compliant clearance joint. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science1996; 210: 215–223.
6.
YanSGuoP. Kinematic accuracy analysis of flexible mechanisms with uncertain link lengths and joint clearances. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2011; 225: 1973–1983.
7.
ZhaoBZhangZDaiX. Modeling and prediction of wear at revolute clearance joints in flexible multibody systems. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2014; 228: 317–329.
8.
TianQZhangYChenL. Simulation of planar flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated revolute joints. Nonlinear Dyn2010; 60: 489–511.
9.
ZhengEZhouX. Modeling and simulation of flexible slider-crank mechanism with clearance for a closed high speed press system. Mech Mach Theory2014; 74: 10–30.
10.
SadeqYMortezaDHamidrezaMD. Nonlinear dynamics and control of crank–slider mechanism with link flexibility and joint clearance. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015. DOI: 10.1177/0954406215593773.
11.
ErkayaSDoğanSUlusŞ. Effects of joint clearance on the dynamics of a partly compliant mechanism: numerical and experimental studies. Mech Mach Theory2015; 88: 125–140.
12.
ErkayaSDoğanS. A comparative analysis of joint clearance effects on articulated and partly compliant mechanisms. Nonlinear Dyn2015; 81: 323–341.
13.
VarediSMDanialiHMDardelM. Optimal dynamic design of a planar slider-crank mechanism with a joint clearance. Mech Mach Theory2015; 86: 191–200.
14.
FloresP. Modeling and simulation of wear in revolute clearance joints in multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory2009; 44: 1211–1222.
15.
MachadoMCostaJSeabraE. The effect of the lubricated revolute joint parameters and hydrodynamic force models on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn2012; 69: 635–654.
TianQLiuCMachadoM. A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn2011; 64: 25–47.
18.
ErkayaSUzmayI. Experimental investigation of joint clearance effects on the dynamics of a slider-crank mechanism. Multibody Syst Dyn2010; 24: 81–102.
19.
ErkayaSUzmayI. Effects of balancing and link flexibility on dynamics of a planar mechanism having joint clearance. Sci Iran2012; 19: 483–490.
20.
YuABonevIAZsombor-MurrayP. Geometric approach to the accuracy analysis of a class of 3-DOF planar parallel robots. Mech Mach Theory2008; 43: 364–375.
ZhangXZhangXChenZ. Dynamic analysis of a 3-RRR parallel mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Mech Mach Theory2014; 78: 105–115.
23.
BayoELedesmaR. Augmented lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn1996; 9: 113–130.
24.
NikraveshPE. Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1988.
25.
ShabanaAA. Computational dynamics, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
26.
BatheK. Finite element procedures, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1996.
27.
ChungJHulbertGM. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-α method. J Appl Mech1993; 60: 371–375.
28.
FloresPAmbrósioJ. On the contact detection for contact-impact analysis in multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn2010; 24: 103–122.
29.
OrdenJ. Analysis of joint clearances in multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn2005; 13: 401–420.
30.
AlvesJPeixinhoNDa SilvaMT. A comparative study of the viscoelastic constitutive models for frictionless contact interfaces in solids. Mech Mach Theory2015; 85: 172–188.
31.
KoshyCSFloresPLankaraniHM. Study of the effect of contact force model on the dynamic response of mechanical systems with dry clearance joints: computational and experimental approaches. Nonlinear Dyn2013; 73: 325–338.
32.
ReisVLDanielGBCavalcaKL. Dynamic analysis of a lubricated planar slider–crank mechanism considering friction and Hertz contact effects. Mech Mach Theory2014; 74: 257–273.
33.
LankaraniHMNikraveshPE. A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Des1990; 112: 369–376.
34.
FloresPAmbrósioJClaroJP. Dynamic analysis for planar multibody mechanical systems with lubricated joints. Multibody Syst Dyn2004; 12: 47–74.
35.
LiuYFLiJZhangZM. Experimental comparison of five friction models on the same test-bed of the micro stick-slip motion system. Mech Sci2015; 6: 15–28.
36.
AmbrósioJImpact of rigid and flexible multibody systems: deformation description and contact models. In: SchiehlenWPragueMV (eds). Virtual nonlinear multibody systems, Springer, 2003, pp. 57–81.
DufvaKESopanenJTMikkolaAM. A two-dimensional shear deformable beam element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J Sound Vib2005; 280: 719–738.
39.
OmarMAShabanaAA. A two-dimensional shear deformable beam for large rotation and deformation problems. J Sound Vib2001; 243: 565–576.
40.
ShabanaAA. Dynamics of multibody systems, Chicago: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
41.
García-VallejoDMayoJEscalonaJL. Efficient evaluation of the elastic forces and the Jacobian in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn2004; 35: 313–329.
