This paper is concerned with optimization of the natural frequency of a vibration neutralizer to minimize the global vibration of a structure at a single frequency. The optimization is carried out using a quadratic minimization technique to determine the dynamic stiffness of the control device that is required, and then the optimum resonance frequency of the neutralizer is determined. It is shown that, with the exception of very low frequencies, an optimally adjusted vibration neutralizer can be as effective as an active device at a single frequency. Simulations are presented with a single neutralizer on a beam to facilitate insight into the mechanisms of control.
GuptaY. P.ChandrasekaranA. R.Absorber systems for earth-quake excitations. In Proceedings of 4th World Conference on Earth-quake Engineering, Santiago, 1969, Part B(3), pp, 139–148.
4.
ShibaK.MaseS.YabeY.TamuraK.Active/passive vibration control for tall buildings. Smart Mater. Struct., 1998, 7(5), 588–598.
5.
KitagawaY.MidorikawaM.Seismic isolation and passive response-control buildings in Japan. Smart Mater. Struct., 1998, 7(5), 581–587.
6.
van DykeJ. D.SchendelJ. W.GundersonC. O.BallardM. R.Cabin noise reduction in DC-9. In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Commercial Aircraft Design Meeting, Los Angeles, June 1967.
7.
LangM. A.LorchD. R.MayD. N.SimpsonM. A.MD-80 aircraft cabin noise control: a case history. NASA/ SAE/DLR 4th Aircraft Interior Noise Workshop, 1992, pp. 13–33.
WalshP. L.LamancusaJ. S.A variable stiffness vibration neutraliser for the minimisation of transient vibration. J. Sound and Vibr., 1992, 158(2), 195–211.
10.
CharetteF.FullerC. R.CarnealJ. P.Control of sound radiation from plates using globally detuned absorbers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1996, 100(4), 2781.
11.
CharetteF.FullerC. R.CarnealJ. P.Adaptive vibration absorbers for control of sound radiation from panels. In 3rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, California, May 1997.
12.
HuangY. M.FullerC. R.The effects of dynamic absorbers on the forced vibration of a cylindrical shell and its coupled interior sound fields. J. Sound and Vibr., 1997, 200(4), 401–418.
13.
HuangY. M.FullerC. R.Vibration and noise control of the fuselage via dynamic absorbers. Trans. ASME, J. Vibr. and Acoust., 1998, 120, 496–502.
14.
BrennanM. J.DayouJ.Global control of vibration using a tunable vibration neutraliser. J. Sound and Vibr., 2000, 232(3), 585–600.
15.
BrennanM. J.Vibration control using a tunable vibration neutraliser. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1997, 211(C2), 91–108.
16.
NelsonP. A.ElliottS. J.Active Control of Sound, 1992 (Academic Press, New York).
17.
KidnerM. R. F.BrennanM. J.Improving the performance of a vibration neutraliser by actively removing damping. J. Sound and Vibr., 1999, 221(4), 587–606.
18.
KidnerM. R. F.BrennanM. J.Tuning a beam-like neutraliser by varying beam cross-section using a fuzzy logic controller. In Proceedings of Active 99, 2-4 December 1999, pp. 283–294.
19.
DayouJ.Global control of flexural vibration of a one-dimensional structure using tuneable vibration neutralisers. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, 1999.
20.
LongT.BrennanM. J.ElliottS. J.Design of smart machinery installations to reduce transmitted vibrations by adaptive modifications of internal forces. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part I, Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 1998, 212(I3), 215–228.
