A modified reactive-extrusion platform was developed to fabricate graphene-reinforced Ecoflex components with reliable deposition, controlled geometry, and functional surface quality. The system enabled continuous mixing and extrusion of a two-part silicone feedstock through dual-syringe delivery, overcoming common issues of premature curing, material backflow, and layer discontinuity. A D-optimal experimental scheme evaluated the influence of graphene loading, nozzle diameter, extrusion multiplier, and print speed on manufacturability and tribological response. All combinations achieved stable filament formation and acceptable dimensional deviation (∼2%–6%), indicating robust printability within the tested operating range. Graphene reinforcement enhanced layer consolidation and reduced surface irregularity, while retaining low processing resistance. Printed samples exhibited lower coefficients of friction and wear compared to neat silicone, without compromising shape fidelity. Independent validation showed prediction deviations below 2%, confirming consistent process behaviour. The results demonstrate that reactive extrusion can produce functionally enhanced elastomer parts with predictable form accuracy and durable sliding surfaces.
OvySAIStanoGPercocoG, et al. Inexpensive monolithic additive manufacturing of silicone structures for bio-inspired soft robotic systems. Eng Res Express2023; 5: 015016.
4.
PeekeLMLiuWPeriyasamyM, et al. Material extrusion additive manufacturing of dual-material composite thermoset silicone components. Polym Eng Sci2024; 64: 218–230.
JosephVSCalaisTStalinT, et al. Silicone/epoxy hybrid resins with tunable mechanical and interfacial properties for additive manufacture of soft robots. Appl Mater Today2021; 22: 100979.
7.
DarbyDRCaiZMasonCR, et al. Modulus and adhesion of Sylgard 184, Solaris and Ecoflex 00-30 silicone elastomers with varied mixing ratios. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139: e52412.
8.
GharaieSZolfagharianAMoghadamAAA, et al. Direct 3D printing of a two-part silicone resin to fabricate highly stretchable structures. Prog Addit Manuf2023; 8: 1555–1571.
9.
KulkarniSSBayreNMKhanKA. Modelling visco-hyperelastic response of silicone-based elastomers for soft robotics and foldable structure applications. Int J Eng Sci2025; 211: 104253.
10.
ProkopchukAEwertAMenningJD, et al. Manufacturing of soft capacitive strain sensor based on dielectric elastomer material for an elastic element of a jaw coupling. Eng Res Express2024; 6: 015403.
11.
ZhangJLuoS. A novel pellet-based 3D printing of high stretchable elastomer. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2025; 239(5): 660–668.
12.
GaoYShengBXiaL, et al. High quality 3D printing of low-density polyethylene blends considering the softening effect of polyolefin elastomer. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2025; 239(8): 1181–1190.
13.
LvJ. Mechanical, thermal, and microstructure analysis of 3D printed polyolefin elastomer-acrylonitrile butadiene styrene blends for tunable mechanical properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2025; 239(13): 1950–1959.
14.
KouediatoukaANLiuQMawignonFJ, et al. Sensing characterization of an amorphous PDMS/Ecoflex blend composite with improved interfacial bonding and rubbing performance. Appl Surf Sci2023; 635: 157675.
HaoTXiaoHLiuY, et al. Gripping performance of soft grippers with fingerprint-like surface texture for slippery objects. Tribol Int2023; 189: 108992.
17.
BertholdRBurgner-KahrsJWangenheimM, et al. Investigating frictional contact behavior for soft material robot simulations. Meccanica2023; 58: 2165–2176.
18.
SuJZhangTFKeLL. Fretting wear behavior of silicone rubber under quartz sand abrasives. Wear2025; 564: 205721.
19.
ShindeASivaIMundeY, et al. Impacts of graphene dosage on the friction and wear performance of a graphene-reinforced silicone rubber nanocomposite. J Mater Res Technol2022; 21: 1570–1580.
20.
SarathPSPrasadVPahovnikD, et al. Effect of fumed silica on the mechanical, thermal and tribological properties of silicone rubber nanocomposites. J Polym Res2022; 29: 53.
21.
AtkinsDJChauALRosasJM, et al. Silicone implant surface roughness, friction and wear. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop2023; 11: 014010.
22.
GaoYWangY. Research on the dynamic behaviors in the sliding friction of silicone. Tribol Lett2023; 71: 15.
23.
SarathPSReghunathRThomasS, et al. Tribological and mechanical properties of silicone rubber/graphite composites. J Compos Mater2021; 55: 3827–3838.
24.
HanRShaoYQuanX, et al. Study on friction behavior of fabric–silicone rubber composites under dry/wet sliding environment. Polym Eng Sci2021; 61: 2023–2032.
25.
GowdaMSHemavathiABSrinivasS, et al. Physico-mechanical, thermal and tribological studies of PTFE-filled POM/silicone composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35: 846–859.
26.
KhanIAl RashidAKoçM. Integration of machine learning and digital twin in additive manufacturing of polymeric-based materials and products. Prog Addit Manuf2025; 10: 10685–10737.
27.
RajRMahatoSMoharanaAP, et al. Predicting dimensional accuracy in 3D-printed PDMS–carbon nanotube composites via machine learning. Polym Compos2024; 45: 2965–2980.
28.
GuoWTLeiYZhaoXH, et al. Printed-scalable microstructure BaTiO3/Ecoflex nanocomposite for high-performance triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered human–machine interaction. Nano Energy2024; 131: 110324.
29.
ShuSWangZChenP, et al. Machine-learning-assisted electronic skins capable of proprioception and exteroception in soft robotics. Adv Mater2023; 35: 2211385.
30.
SarathPSMaheshTYPandeyMK, et al. Tribological performance of ionic-liquid-modified graphene oxide/silicone rubber composite and correlation of properties using machine learning methods. Polym Eng Sci2022; 62: 1473–1484.
31.
IbrahimMAÇamurHSavaşMA, et al. Hybrid artificial intelligence models with multi-objective optimization for prediction of tribological behavior of PTFE matrix composites. Appl Sci2022; 12: 8671.
