Improvement of material flow in tube hydroforming by advanced sealing methods

Abstract

In this paper, two advanced sealing methods are proposed to enhance the formability of aluminium alloys in the tube hydroforming process. These methods are aimed at omitting friction force at the contact area between the tube and the die in the feed region and facilitating the material flow to the deformation region. The advanced sealing methods are numerically and experimentally examined against the conventional sealing method by conducting the free bulge test on AA6063 aluminium tubes. The deformation mechanics are deeply analysed in the principal strain space to identify the influence of the sealing methods on deformation paths. In addition, the effectiveness of the advanced sealing methods is evaluated under different lubrication conditions and contact lengths in the feed region. Results show that in the advanced sealing methods compared to the conventional one, the thickness in the feed region does not increase and the necking occurs in larger in-plane strains, leading to a higher bulge height. Results also allow concluding that a higher bulge height is formed using the second advanced sealing method, in which the tube is pressurized from both sides in the feed region. Thus, the advanced sealing methods are recommended for tube hydroforming of aluminium alloys with low formability.

Keywords

Tube hydroforming advanced sealing method friction formability aluminium alloys

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Scattina

Avalle

Analysis of the mechanical expansion process of thin-walled tubes for air heat-exchanger production. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2022; 236(11): 1453–1465.

Zhang

Chu

, et al. Experimental research on deformation and dimensional accuracy of rectangular-section tubular part during open die hydro-pressing process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2021; 235(4): 705–714.

Pourhamid

Shirazi

A comprehensive damage criterion in tube hydroforming. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2021; 235(3): 417–430.

Barfeh

Hashemi

Safdarian

, et al. Predicting the forming limit diagram of the fine-grained AA 1050 sheet using GTN damage model with experimental verifications. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2022. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221138900.

Magrinho

Silva

Centeno

, et al. Formability limits by local buckling in thin-walled tubes. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. Epub ahead of print 16 December 2022. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221138181.

Rigas

Jäckisch

Merklein

Effect of elevated tool temperatures on the properties of high-strength aluminum alloys during tailor quench forming (TQF). Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2022. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221135114.

Hashemi

Naeini

Liaghat

, et al. Forming limit diagram of aluminum AA6063 tubes at high temperatures by bulge tests. J Mech Sci Technol 2014; 28(11): 4745–4752.

Ngaile

Jaeger

Altan

. Lubrication in tube hydroforming (THF): part I. Lubrication mechanisms and development of model tests to evaluate lubricants and die coatings in the transition and expansion zones. J Mater Process Technol 2004; 146(1): 108–115.

Ngaile

Jaeger

Altan

. Lubrication in tube hydroforming (THF): part II. Performance evaluation of lubricants using LDH test and pear-shaped tube expansion test. J Mater Process Technol 2004; 146(1): 116–123.

10.

Orban

SJ.

Analytical modeling of wall thinning during corner filling in structural tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 2007; 194(1–3): 7–14.

11.

Zhang

, et al. Study of tube hydroforming in a trapezoid-sectional die. Thin-Walled Struct 2009; 47(11): 1397–1403.

12.

Yuan

, et al. Reduction of friction in the guiding zone during tube hydroforming. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2012; 226(7): 1275–1280.

13.

Kasaei

Shahbazi Karami

Abbaszadeh

, et al. Effect of sealing position on bulge height in hydroforming of aluminum tubes. J Appl Comput Sci Mech 2018; 29(1): 81–96.

14.

Zhang

Wang

Cui

, et al. Analysis of corner filling behavior during tube hydro-forming of rectangular section based on Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman ductile damage model. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2015; 229(9): 1566–1574.

15.

Kasaei

Oliveira

MC.

Influence of the contact with friction on the deformation behavior of advanced high strength steels in the Nakajima test. J Strain Anal Eng Des 2022; 57(3): 193–207.

16.

Park

Han

Jeong

, et al. Advanced sealing system to prevent leakage in hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 2017; 247: 103–110.

17.

, et al. A novel lubrication method for hydroforming of thin-walled aluminum alloy T-shaped tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019; 102(5–8): 2265–2273.

18.

Ktari

Abdelkefi

Guermazi

, et al. Numerical investigation of plastic flow and residual stresses generated in hydroformed tubes. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications 2021; 235(5): 1100–1111.

19.

Kasaei

Naeini

Liaghat

, et al. Revisiting the wrinkling limits in flexible roll forming. J Strain Anal Eng Des 2015; 50(7): 528–541.

20.

Rossard

Mise en forme des métaux et alliages. Paris: CNRS, 1976.

21.

International Organization for Standardization. Metallic materials—sheet and strip—determination of forming limit curves—part 2: determination of forming limit curves in the laboratory. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2008, p.12004-2.

22.

Altan

Tekkaya

AE.

Sheet metal forming: fundamentals. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2012.

23.

Martins

PAF

Bay

Tekkaya

, et al. Characterization of fracture loci in metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 2014; 83: 112–123.