To date, there have been a number of studies that have examined how policies move from one jurisdiction to another. However, few of these studies have examined the micro-interactive effects of actors. This is necessary to understand how actors shape outcomes over time. The aim of this paper is to engage with this micro-level literature through an empirical study of policy transfer in the field of architectural norms in hospital construction in post-Soviet states. To do this, we generate several theoretical assumptions to link the transfer literature to wider debates in the governance framework. The goal is to discover how the power of actors interacts in the policymaking processes to influence outcomes over time and in light of learning. What we hope to do is bring the interactive and dynamic effects that occur between agents attempting to shape the transfer process back into the transfer picture. The aim is to show that power flows and that these flows alter the shape and outcome of the transfer process.
AllalA (2010) Les configurations développementistes internationales au Maroc et en Tunisie: des policy transfers à portée limitée. Critique Internationale (48): 97–116.
3.
AnceloviciMJensonJ (2012) La standardisation et les mécanismes du transfert transnational. Gouvernement et action publique1(1): 37–58.
4.
AndersG (2007) Redimensionner la fonction publique au Malawi: préceptes des organisations internationales et réalités administratives. Critique Internationale (35): 85–99.
5.
BeachDPedersenRB (2013) Process-Tracing Methods. Foundations and Guidelines, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
6.
BlatterJHaverlandM (2012) Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BulmerS (2009) Politics in Time meets the politics of time: Historical institutionalism and the EU timescape. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 307–324.
8.
BulmerSDolowitzDHumphriesP, et al.(2007) Policy Transfer in European Union Governance, Oxon: Routledge.
9.
ChristensenTLishengDPainterM (2008) La réforme administrative au sein de l'administration centrale chinoise – L'importance de « l'inspiration occidentale. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives74(3): 371–394.
10.
DelpeuchTVassilevaM (2009) Contribution à une sociologie politique des entrepreneurs internationaux de transferts de réformes judiciaires. L'Année sociologique59(2): 371–402.
11.
DelpeuchTVassilevaM (2017) Judicial Reforms as Political Enterprise. American transfer entrepreneurs in Post-communist Bulgaria. In: HadjiiskyMPalLAWalkerC (eds) Public Policy Transfer: Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects, Chltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 29–50.
12.
DimitrovaALSteunenbergB (2016) The power of implementers: A three-level game model of compliance with EU policy and its application to cultural heritage. Journal of European Public Policy24(8): 1–22.
13.
DobbinFSimmonsBGarrettG (2008) The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?The Annual Review of Sociology33: 449–472.
14.
DolowitzDPMarshD (1996) Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies44(2): 343–357.
15.
DolowitzDPMedearisD (2009) Considerations of the obstacles and opportunities to formalizing cross-national policy transfer to the United States. Environment and Planning C27(4): 684–697.
16.
DolowitzD (2009) Learning by observing. Policy and Politics37(3): 317–334.
17.
Dolowitz DP (2017) Afterword: policy transfer 2.0. In: Hadjinski, M Pal LA and Walker C (eds) Public Policy Transfer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
18.
DolowitzD (2018) Learning in the transfer process. In: HoppeRColebatchH (eds) Handbook of the Policy Process, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19.
DolowitzDPMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance13(1): 5–24.
20.
DysonT (2010) Growing regional variation: Demographic change and its implications. In: HeathAFJefferyR (eds) Diversity and Change in Modern India: Economic Social and Political Approaches, Oxford: Oxford University Press/British Academy, pp. 19–46.
21.
Favarel-GarriguesGStartsevJ (2007) La combinaison des héritages et des emprunts dans la transformation de l’administration russe. Critique internationale (35): 69–84.
22.
Gilardi F (2012) Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In: Carlsnaes W, Risse T and Simmons B Handbook of international relations, 2nd edition, London: Sage.
23.
GrahamERShipanCEVoldenC (2013) The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science43(3): 673–701.
24.
GrahamERShipanCEVoldenC (2014) The communication of ideas across subfields in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics47(2): 468–476.
25.
GoetzK (2009) How does the EU tick? Five propositions on political time. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 202–220.
26.
Hadjiisky M, Pal LA and Walker C (eds) (2017) Public Policy Transfer: Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
HuréM (2014) La différenciation des modèles standards urbains. Le cas de la réception d’un système de vélos en libre-service à Barcelone. Gouvernement et action publique3(4): 115–144.
28.
KesaK (2014) Le partage de l'expérience balte envers les pays du voisinage oriental de l'Union européenne. Politique européenne46: 86–116.
29.
LadiS (2011) Policy change and soft Europeanization. Public Administration89(4): 1643–1663.
30.
LlaciSDibraSTabakuJ (2010) International and national actors role in skills development policy transfer or policy learning – The case of Albania. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences9(2): 49–67.
31.
LavenexSSchimmelfennigF (2009) EU rules beyond EU borders: Theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy16(6): 791–812.
32.
MaggettiMGilardiF (2016) Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy36(1): 87–107.
33.
MavrotC (2017) Concerted horizontal policy transfer. How local action can drive national compliance to international norms. In: HadjiiskyMPalLAWalkerC (eds) Public Policy Transfer: Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 101–124.
34.
MokhtarKHaronM (2007) Lesson drawing the congruence of policy transfer and benchmarking. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review7(1): 65–76.
35.
MossbergerKWolmanH (2003) Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation. Public Administration Review63(4): 428–440.
36.
Peck J (2011) Creative moments: Working culture, through municipal socialism and neoliberal urbanism. In: McCann E and Ward K (eds) Mobile Urbanism: Cities & Policy-Making in the Global Age. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University Press.
37.
PeckJ (2002) Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography78(3): 331–360.
38.
PlugaruR (2014) Le pouvoir des acteurs internationaux dans les processus de transfert de normes techniques: le cas des organisations internationales et des entreprises privés dans la modernisation des hôpitaux en Ukraine et en Moldavie. Politique européenne46: 60–85.
39.
Plugaru R (2013) Transferts internationaux et changements institutionnels dans les anciens pays soviétiques: l’évolution des normes techniques de construction des hôpitaux en Ukraine et en Moldavie (1991–2011). PhD Thesis, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
40.
Powell M and DiMaggio P (eds) (1991) New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
41.
PrinceR (2010) Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A42(1): 169–186.
42.
RadaelliC (2000) Policy transfer in the European Union. Governance13(1): 25–43.
43.
RoseR (1991) What is lesson drawing?Journal of Public Policy11(1): 3–30.
44.
SabatierPJenkins-SmithH (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
SauruggerS (2014) Europeanisation in times of crisis. Political Studies Review49(2): 81–92.
46.
SauruggerS (2013) Constructivism and public policy approaches in the EU. From ideas to power games. Journal of European Public Policy20(6): 888–906.
47.
SauruggerSSurelY (2006) Lélargissement de l'Union européenne: un processus de transfert institutionnel? Introduction. Revue internationale de politique comparée2(13): 177–178.
48.
ScharpfF (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO: Westview.
49.
Simmons BA, Dobbin F and Garrett G. (eds.). (2008) The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
StoneD (2017) Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy & Politics45(1): 55–70.
51.
StoneD (2010) Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the open society institute. Policy & Politics38(2): 269–287.
52.
StoneD (2000) Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance13(1): 45–70.
53.
Shipan CR and Volden C (2008) The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American journal of political science 52(4): 840–857.
54.
WalkerCK (2018) Policy transfer in a corporatist context: Agents, adjustments and continued innovation. Public Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 30 January 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718754617.
55.
WolmanH (1992) Understanding cross-national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the United States. Governance5(1): 27–45.
56.
WoodA (2015a) Multiple temporalities of policy circulation: Gradual, repetitive and delayed processes of BRT adoption in South African cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(3): 568–580.
57.
WoodA (2015b) The politics of policy circulation: Unpacking the relationship between South African and South American cities in the adoption of bus rapid transit. Antipode47(4): 1062–1079.
58.
ZahariadisN (2014) Ambiguity and multiple streams. In: SabatierPWeibleC (eds) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 25–58.
59.
ZitoA (2009) European agencies as agents of governance and EU learning. Journal of European Public Policy16(8): 1224–1243.
