This article presents research on nurses’ perceptions of the 2005 UK NHS reform ‘Agenda for Change’ (AfC) in order to identify lessons to inform future NHS policy development. Semi-structured interviews (n = 18) were conducted with NHS nurses who were in post prior to the reform and subsequently subjected to the policy reform. Interviews were undertaken by a single researcher and lasted between 40–60 minutes. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to identify key concepts and findings. The article finds that each facet of the Agenda for Change was not perceived to have achieved the policy goals it intended to. The article concludes that repeated political re-organisation of the National Health Service (NHS) in England has been demoralising for hospital staff.
AndersonJE (1975) Public Policy Making, London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.
2.
AndersonGSotir HusseyP (2006) Influencing government policy. In: PencheonDGuestCMelzerDGrayM (eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Health, London: Oxford University Press.
3.
Ball J and Pike G (2006) Impact of Agenda for Change: Results from a Survey of RCN Members Working in the NHS/GP Practices. Hove: Employment Research Limited.
4.
BambraCFoxDScott-SamuelA (2005) Towards a politics of health. Health Promotion International20(2): 187–193.
5.
BowenGA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research8(1): 137–152.
6.
Boydell V and Lander R (2011) Generating political change: examining the role of research-policy linkages in contributing to policy development for sexual and reproductive health. In: Fifth Annual PopPov conference on population, reproductive health and economic development. Marseille, France, 19--21 January, pp. P1–P12.
7.
BrittenN (2007) Qualitative Interviews, in Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
8.
BrymanA (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Buchan J and Evans D (2007) Realising the benefits? Assessing the implementation of agenda for change. Report commissioned by the King’s Fund, London, UK.
10.
BuseKMaysNWaltG (2012) Making Health Policy, 2nd ed. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
11.
CohenMDMarchJGOlsenJP (1972) A garbage can model of organisational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly17: 1–25.
12.
CreswellJW (2007) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
13.
CrosbyBL (1996) Policy implementation: the organizational challenge. World Development24(9): 1403–1415.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Research: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
20.
GlenngardAHMainaTM (2007) Reversing the trend of weak policy implementation in the Kenyan health sector? – a study of budget allocation and spending of health resources versus set priorities. Health Research Policy and Systems5(3): 21–30.
21.
GreenbergDHLinkszDMandellM (2003) Social Experimentation and Public Policy Making, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
22.
GrindleMAThomasJW (1991) Public Choices and Policy Change: the Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries, London: John Hopkins University Press.
23.
HallsworthMParkerSRutterJ (2011) Policy Making in the Real World. Evidence and Analysis, London: Institute for Government.
24.
HamC (2009) Health Policy in Britain, 6th ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
House of Commons (2012) Health and Social Care Act, London: HMSO, 2011.
26.
HunterDJ (2011) Change of Government: One more big band health care reform in England’s National Health Service. International Journal of Health Services41(1): P159–P174.
27.
HunterDJKillornanA (2004) Tackling Health Inequalities: Turning Policy into Practice?, London: Health Development Agency.
28.
Hurst J (2010) Effective ways to realise policy reforms in health systems. OECD Health Working Papers (51) OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmh377l4n9x-en (accessed 8 July 2014).
29.
JumaCClarkN (1995) Policy research in sub-Saharan Africa: An exploration. Public Administration and Development15: 121–137.
30.
KellyB (1998) Preserving moral integrity: a follow-up study with new graduate nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing28(5): 1134–1145.
31.
KingdonJW (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, MA: Brown & Co.
32.
LangleyGJNolanKMNolanTW (2009) The Improvement Guide. A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
33.
LeeKMillsA (1982) Policy-Making and Planning in the Health Sector, London: Croom Helm.
34.
LindblomCE (1959) The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review19(2): 79–88.
35.
LindblomCEWoodhouseEJ (1993) The Policy-Making Process, 2nd ed. London: Prentice-Hall.
36.
McCaffertySWilliamsIHunterDJ (2012) Implementing world class commissioning competencies. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy17: 40–48.
37.
National Audit Office (2009) NHS Pay Modernisation in England: Agenda for Change, London: HMSO.
38.
NaylorCGoodwinN (2010) Building High-quality Commissioning. What Role can External Organisations Play?, London: The King’s Fund.
39.
Nutley S, Davies H and Walter I (2002) Evidence based policy and practice: cross sector lessons from the UK. ESRC Working Paper 9.
40.
PatonC (1996) Health Policy and Management: The Health Care Agenda in a British Political Context, London: Chapman and Hall.
41.
PopeCMaysN (2000) Qualitative Research in Health Care, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books.
42.
SeymourJAlmackKKennedyS (2010) Implementing advance care planning: a qualitative study of community nurses views and experiences. BMC Palliative Care9(4): 9–18.
43.
SmeeC (2005) Speaking Truth to Power, Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
44.
Solesbury W (2001) Evidence based policy: whence it came and where it's going. ESRC, Working Paper 1.
45.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
TrussC (2008) Continuity and change: the role of the HR function in the modern public sector. Public Administration86(4): 1071–1088.
47.
WaltG (1994) Health Policy: An Introduction to Process and Power, London: Zed Books.
48.
Zahariadis N (2008) Ambiguity and Choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15(4), 514–530.
49.
ZahariadisNChristopherSA (1995) Ideas, networks, and policy streams: privatization in Britain and Germany. Policy Studies Review14: 71–98.
