Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-4
Canada’s Senior Public Service and the Typology of Bargains: from the Hierarchy of Senior Civil Servants to A Community of ‘‘Controlled’’ Entrepreneurs
New Public Management (NPM) developments have changed the way the Canadian public service works. Specifically, they have changed a number of aspects of the work, role and management of the senior public service and its relationship with politicians. Hood and Lodge have proposed a typology of these relationships, and if their typology is applied to Canada, we find that senior officials used to adopt a hierarchist-type position with respect to political leaders. But has their position changed since the advent of NPM? The evidence shows that senior executive profiles and practices have become managerialized. In terms of the typology, the change has been relatively small, and the push toward entrepreneurship and individualism has been offset by an increasing number of systemic controls.
Aberbach JD, Putnam RD and Rockman BA ( 1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Aucoin P. and Savoie DJ ( 2009) The Politics-administration Dichotomy: Democracy Versus Bureaucracy? in Dwivedi OP, et al. (eds) The Evolving Physiology of Government: Canadian Public Administration in Transition. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp.97-117.
3.
Bourgault J. ( 1997) La satisfaction des ministres des gouvernements Mulroney face à leurs sous-ministres: 1984-1993 (research report no. 22, March 1997). Ottawa : Canadian Centre for Management Development.
4.
Bourgault J. ( 2003) Le rôle et les défis contemporains des sous-ministres du gouvernement du Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
5.
Bourgault J. ( 2007a) Les Facteurs Contributifs Au Leadership Du Greffier Dans La Fonction Publique Du Canada. Administration publique du Canada50(4): 541-572.
6.
Bourgault J. ( 2007b) Corporate Management at Top Level of Governments: TheCanadian Case. International Review of Administrative Sciences73(2): 257-274.
7.
Bourgault J. ( 2010) Les Réformes De Gestion Au Gouvernement Fédéral Du Canada: Un Mouvement Continu. in Bernier R (ed) L’espace canadien: Mythes et réalités . Québec City: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
8.
Bourgault J. (in press a) Les Sous-Ministres Du Gouvernement Fédéral: Statut, Profil Et Roles. in Bourgault J and Dunn C (eds) Deputy Ministers in Canada . Toronto: University of Toronto Press/IPAC.
9.
Bourgault J. (in press b) L’identité et les pratiques professionnelles des sous-ministres canadiens sous l’effet de la NGP: vers une comparaison internationale. Universite catholique de Louvain, Université Libre de Bruxelles/Association universitaire de recherche sur l’action publique.
10.
Bourgault J. and Dion S. ( 1989) Canadian Senior Civil Servants and Transitions of Government: The Whitehall Model Seen From Ottawa. International Review of Administrative Science56: 149-169.
11.
Bourgault J., Dion S. and Lemay M. ( 1993) Performance Appraisals of Top Civil Servants: Creating a Corporate Culture. Public Administration Review53(1): 73-80.
12.
Campbell CJ ( 1989) Review Article: The Political Roles of Senior Government Officials in Advanced Democracies. British Journal of Political Science18: 243-272.
13.
Canada (2010) Fourth Report to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister’s Advisory Committee on the Public Service. Ottawa: Privy Council Office.
14.
Commonwealth of Australia (2010) Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for the Reform of Australian Government Administration, Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration. Canberra: Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
15.
De Visscher C. and Varone F. ( 2004) La Nouvelle Gestion Publique « En Action » . Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée11(2): 177-185.
16.
Government of Canada (2010) Privy Council Office (PCO) website: http://www.pcobcp.gc.ca/docs/secretariats/spsp-psps/dmc-csm/docs/dmcl-csml.pdf .
17.
Gow JI ( 2004) A Canadian Model of Public Administration. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service .
18.
Halliday WED ( 1959) The Executive of the Government in Canada. Canadian Public Administration2: 229-241.
19.
Hay MA ( 1982) Understanding The PCO: the Ultimate Facilitator . Optimum13(1): 10-11.
20.
Heintzman R. ( 1997) Canada and Public Administration,. in Bourgault J, Demers M and Williams C (eds) Administration publique et management public: expériences canadiennes. Quebec City: Publications du Québec, pp.1-23.
21.
Hood C. ( 2001) Relations Entre Ministres/Politiciens Et Fonctionnaires: L’ancien Et Le Nouveau Marchandage. in Peters GB and Savoie DJ (eds) Gouvernance au XXe siècle : revitaliser la fonction publique . Quebec City: Presses de l’Université Laval .
22.
Hood C. and Lodge M. ( 2006) The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty and Blame. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Jarvis MD(2009) The Adoption of the Accounting Officer System in Canada: Changing Relationships ? Canadian Public Administration52(4): 549-568.
24.
Kernaghan K. ( 1976) Politics, Policy and Public Servants: Political Neutrality Revisited. Canadian Public Administration19(3): 432-456.
25.
Mintzberg H. and Bourgault J. ( 2000) Manager en public. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
26.
Savoie DJ ( 1999) Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
Savoie DJ ( 2003) Breaking the Bargain: Public Servants, Ministers, and Parliament. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
28.
Savoie DJ ( 2008) Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
29.
Sossin L. ( 2006) Defining Boundaries: The Constitutional Argument For Bureaucratic Independence and its Implication for the Accountability of the Public Service , in the Commission of Inquiry into The Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities. Restoring Accountability; Research Studies, Volume2. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada , pp.25-72.
30.
Sutherland S. ( 2006) The Clerk of the Privy Council, in the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities. Restoring Accountability; Research Studies, Volume3. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, pp.21-114.
31.
Wilson VS ( 1983) Mandarins and Kibitzers: Men in and Around the Trenches of Political Power in Ottawa. Canadian Public Administration26(3): 447-461.
