Across a range of health care systems there is a responsibility placed on meso-level budget holders to set priorities and allocate resources within constrained budgets. The literature suggests that these organizations have typically defaulted to historical and/or political processes for decision making. Whilst the literature on resource allocation in health care attests to the political nature of decision making, this has remained largely under-theorized and therefore priority setters may be unfamiliar with the analytic benefits of applying insights from the broader political sciences. Conversely, policy scientists may know relatively little about existing research on how healthcare organizations make allocative and redistributive decisions. This paper aims to open a dialogue between these solitudes by exploring political effects on health care priority setting, using the interpretive concepts ideas, interests and institutions.
ApollionoDEBeroLA (2007) The creation of industry front groups: The tobacco industry and “Get Government Off Our Back”. American Journal of Public Health97: 419–427.
2.
ArmstrongKMittonCCarletonB (2008) Drug formulary decision-making in two regional health authorities in British Columbia, Canada. Health Policy88: 308–316.
3.
AshtonTCummingJDevlinN (2000) Priority-setting in New Zealand: Translating principles into practice. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy5: 170–175.
4.
AstleyJWake-DysterW (2001) Evidence-based priority setting. Australian Health Review24: 32–39.
5.
BaltussenRNiessenL (2006) Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation4: 1–9.
6.
BambraCFoxDScott-SamuelA (2005) Towards a politics of health. Health Promotion International20: 187–193.
7.
BarnesMNewmanJSullivanH (2004) Power, participation, and political renewal: Theoretical perspectives on public participation under New Labour in Britain. Social Politics11: 267–279.
8.
BateADonaldsonCMurtaghMJ (2007) Managing to manage healthcare resources in the English NHS? What can health economics teach? What can health economics learn?Health Policy84: 249–261.
9.
BelandD (2005) Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy & Administration39: 1–18.
10.
BohmerPPainCWattA (2001) Maximising health gain within available resources in the New Zealand Public Health System. Health Policy55: 37–50.
11.
BuseKMaysNWaltG (2012) Making Health Policy, 3rd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press.
ChecklandKHarrisonSMarshallM (2007) Is the metaphor of ‘barriers to change’ useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy12: 95–100.
14.
ChessieK (2009) Health system regionalization in Canada’s Provincial and Territorial Health Systems: Do citizen governance boards represent, engage, and empower?International Journal of Health Services39: 705–724.
15.
ChurchJSmithN (2006) Health reform and privatization in Alberta. Canadian Public Administration49: 486–505.
16.
ClarkeJ (2004) Changing Welfare, Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy, London: Sage Publications Inc.
17.
ContandriopoulosD (2011) On the nature and strategies of organized interests in health care policy making. Administration & Society43: 45–65.
18.
CulyerAJLomasJ (2006) Deliberative processes and evidence-informed decision making in healthcare: Do they work and how might we know?Evidence & Policy2: 357–371.
19.
DanielsNSabinJ (2002) Setting Limits Fairly: Can We Learn to Share Medical Resources?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
DefechereuxTPaolucciFMirelmanA (2012) Health care priority setting in Norway: A multicriteria decision analysis. BMC Health Services Research12: 1–7.
21.
DionneFMittonCSmithN (2008) Decision maker views on priority setting in the Vancouver Island Health Authority. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation6: 1–8.
22.
DonaldsonCBateAMittonC (2008) Priority setting in the public sector: Turning economics into a management process. In: HartleyJDonaldsonCSkeltcherJ (eds) Managing to Improve Public Services, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88112.
23.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, NY: Harper.
24.
EddamaOCoastJ (2008) A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision making. Health Policy86: 129–141.
25.
ExworthyM (2008) Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: Using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy and Planning23: 318–327.
26.
GibsonJLMartinDKSingerPA (2004) Setting priorities in health care organizations: Criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Services Research4: 1–8.
27.
GibsonJLMartinDKSingerPA (2005) Evidence, economics and ethics: Resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthcare Quarterly8: 50–59.
28.
GibsonJLMittonCMartinDK (2006) Ethics and economics: Does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy11: 32–37.
29.
GoddardMHauckKPrekerA (2006) Priority setting in health – a political economy perspective. Health Economics, Policy and Law1: 79–90.
30.
GreenerIPowellJ (2003) Health authorities, priority-setting and resource allocation: A study in decision-making in New Labour’s NHS. Social Policy and Administration37: 35–48.
31.
HallP (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics25: 275–296.
32.
HallP (1999) The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations. In: LichbachMIZuckermanAS (eds) Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–207.
33.
HallPTaylorR (1996) Political science and the three ‘new institutionalisms’. Political Studies44: 936–957.
34.
HarrisonSSmithC (2003) Neo-bureaucracy and public management: The case of medicine in the National Health Service. Competition & Change7: 243–254.
35.
HartleyJSkelcherC (2008) The agenda for public service improvement. In: HartleyJDonaldsonCSkeltcherJ (eds) Managing to Improve Public Services, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.
36.
HasmanAMcIntoshEHopeT (2008) What reasons do those with practical experience use in deciding on priorities for healthcare resources? A qualitative study. Journal of Medical Ethics34: 658–663.
37.
HayC (2004) Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations. Review of International Political Economy11: 204–226.
38.
HillCLynnL (2005) Is hierarchical governance in decline: Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15: 173–195.
39.
HoodC (1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Administration69: 3–19.
40.
JanSDommersEMooneyG (2003) A politico-economic analysis of decision making in funding health service organizations. Social Science and Medicine57: 427–435.
41.
JoyceP (2001) Governmentality and risk: Setting priorities in the new NHS. Sociology of Health and Illness23: 594–614.
42.
KingCS (2000) Talking beyond the rational. American Review of Public Administration30: 271–291.
43.
KingdonJW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
44.
KleinR (1996) The New Politics of the NHS, Harlow: Longman.
45.
KleinR (2010) Rationing in the fiscal ice age. Health Economics, Policy and Law5: 389–396.
46.
KlijnESkelcherC (2007) Democracy and network governance: Compatible or not?Public Administration85: 587–608.
47.
LavisJLFarrantMSRStoddartGL (2001) Barriers to employment-related healthy public policy in Canada. Health Promotion International16: 9–20.
48.
Lazar H (2009) A cross-provincial comparison of health care reform in Canada: Building blocks and some preliminary findings. Canadian Political Science Review 3: 1–14. Available at: http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr/article/view/190/254 (accessed 2 October 2013).
49.
LecoursA (2005) New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
50.
Le GrandJ (2003) Motivation, Agency and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
LewisSJKouriDEstabrooksCA (2001) Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: An interim report. CMAJ164: 343–347.
52.
LeysC (2001) The British National Health Service in the face of neo-liberalism. In: ArmstrongPArmstrongHCoburnD (eds) Unhealthy Times: Political Economy Perspectives on Health and Care in Canada, Toronto: Oxford University Press, pp. 66–90.
53.
LightDWHughesD (2004) A sociological perspective on rationing: Power, rhetoric and situated practices. In: BuryMGabeJ (eds) The Sociology of Health and Illness: A Reader, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 341–352.
54.
LomasJVeenstraGWoodsJ (1997) Devolving authority for health care in Canada’s provinces: 3. Motivations, attitudes and approaches of board members. CMAJ156: 669–676.
55.
McCaffertySWilliamsIHunterD (2012) Implementing world class commissioning competencies. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy17: 40–48.
56.
MannionRHarrisonSJacobsR (2009) From cultural cohesion to rules and competition: The trajectory of senior management culture in English NHS Hospitals, 2001–2008. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine102: 332–336.
57.
MarchJGOlsenJP (2008) Elaborating the new institutionalism. In: RockmanBABinderSARhodesRAW (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
58.
MartinEPomeyM-PForestP-G (2010) One step forward, one step back: Quebec’s 2003–04 health and social services regionalization policy. Canadian Public Administration53: 467–488.
59.
MehtaJ (2011) The varied role of ideas in politics: From “whether” to “how”. In: BelandDCoxRH (eds) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.
60.
MenonDStafinskiS (2008) Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: Findings from a citizens’ jury. Health Expectations11: 282–293.
61.
MilewaTBarryC (2005) Health policy and the politics of evidence. Social Policy & Administration39: 498–512.
62.
MittonCDonaldsonC (2001) Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974–1999. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy6: 239–248.
63.
MittonCDonaldsonC (2004) Priority Setting Toolkit: A Guide to the Use of Economics in Healthcare Decision Making, London: BMJ Books.
64.
MittonCPattenSDonaldsonC (2005) Priority-setting in health authorities: Moving beyond the barriers. The Calgary experience. Healthcare Quarterly8: 49–55.
65.
MittonCPeacockSDonaldsonC (2003) Using PBMA in health care priority setting: Description, challenges and experience. Applied Health Economics & Health Policy2: 121–127.
66.
MittonCProutS (2004) Setting priorities in the South West of Western Australia: Where are we now?Australian Health Review28: 301–310.
67.
MittonCSmithNPeacockS (2009) Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy91: 219–228.
68.
MittonCSmithNPeacockS (2011) Integrating public input into healthcare priority-setting decisions. Evidence & Policy7: 347–363.
69.
NumeratoDSalvatoreDFattoreG (2012) The impact of management on medical professionalism: A review. Sociology of Health & Illness24: 626–644.
70.
ParkinsonJ (2004) Why deliberate? The encounter between deliberation and new public managers. Public Administration82: 377–395.
71.
PeacockSMittonCRutaD (2010) Priority setting in healthcare: Towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research10: 539–552.
72.
PowerM (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
QuadagnoJ (2010) Institutions, interest groups, and ideology: An agenda for the sociology of health care reform. Journal of Health and Social Behavior51: 125–136.
74.
Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
75.
RobinsonSDickinsonHFreemanT (2012) Structures and processes for priority-setting by health-care funders: A national survey of primary care trusts in England. Health Services Management Research25: 113–130.
76.
RoseN (1993) Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society22: 283–299.
77.
RoseN (1996) The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society25: 327–356.
78.
RyfeD (2005) Does deliberative democracy work?Annual Review of Political Science8: 49–71.
79.
SandersonI (2000) Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation6: 433–454.
80.
SmithNMittonCPeacockS (2009) Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: A collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Services Research9: 1–9.
81.
StewardG (2001) Public Bodies, Private Parts: Surgical Contracts and Conflicts of Interest at the Calgary Regional Health Authority, Edmonton, AB: The Parkland Institute.
82.
StokerG (2006) Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?American Review of Public Administration36: 41–57.
83.
Stone DA (1988) Policy Paradox and Political Reason. New York: HarperCollins.
84.
TenbenselT (2000) Health prioritization as rationalist policy making: Problems, prognoses and prospects. Policy & Politics28: 425–440.
85.
WaddellCLavisJNAbelsonJ (2005) Research use in children’s mental health policy in Canada: Maintaining vigilance amid ambiguity. Social Science and Medicine61: 1649–1657.
86.
WaltGShiffmanJSchneiderH (2008) “Doing” health policy analysis: Methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy and Planning23: 308–317.
87.
WilliamsI (2013) Institutions, cost-effectiveness analysis and healthcare rationing: The example of healthcare coverage in the English National Health Services. Policy & Politics41: 223–239.
88.
WilliamsIPhillipsDNicholsonC (2014) Evaluation of a deliberative approach to citizen involvement in health care priority setting. Leadership in Health Services27: 5–19.
