ArnoldTVacherA (2023) ‘Woodstock of Degrowth’: Take-aways and resources from EP’s Beyond Growth Conference. In: EU Staff for Climate blog. Available at: www.eustaff4climate.info (accessed 12 December 2024).
2.
AykutSCSchenuitFKlenkeJ, et al. (2022) It’s a performance, not an orchestra! Rethinking soft coordination in global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics22(4): 173–196.
3.
BiermannFKimRE (2020) The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: A critical appraisal of approaches to define a ‘safe operating space’ for humanity. Annual Review of Environment and Resources45: 497–521.
4.
BourdieuP (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BrandUMuracaBPineaultÉ, et al. (2021) From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy17(1): 264–291.
6.
BrulleRJRobertsJTSpencerMC (eds.) (2024) Climate Obstruction across Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
ChakrabartyD (2020) The Human Sciences and Climate Change. Science and Culture86(1–2): 46–48.
8.
EckertEKovalevskaO (2021) Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management14(2): 80.
9.
EkbergKForchtnerBHultmanM, et al. (2022) Climate Obstruction: How Denial, Delay and Inaction Are Heating the Planet. New York: Taylor & Francis.
10.
GengnagelVZimmermannK (2022) The European Green Deal as a moonshot–caring for a climate-neutral yet prospering continent?Historical Social Research47(4): 267–302.
11.
GerstenbergA (2024) Ideas in transition? Policymakers’ ideas of the social dimension of the green transition. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft34, 1–23.
12.
GoughI (2017) Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
GuptaJLivermanDProdaniK, et al. (2023) Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries. Nature Sustainability6(6): 630–638.
14.
HaasTSyrovatkaFJürgenI (2022) The European Green Deal and the limits of ecological modernisation. Culture, Practice & Europeanization7(2): 247–261.
15.
IbrahimYRödderS (2022) Schlüsselwerke der sozialwissenschaftlichen Klimaforschung. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
16.
KallisGMastiniRZografosC (2024) Perceptions of degrowth in the European Parliament. Nature Sustainability7(1): 64–72.
17.
OssewaardeMOssewaarde-LowtooR (2020) The EU’s Green Deal: A third alternative to green growth and degrowth?Sustainability12(23): 9825.
18.
PalssonGSzerszynskiBSörlinS, et al. (2013) Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy28: 3–13.
19.
PlehweDNeujeffskiMHaasT (2024) Climate obstruction in the European Union. In: BrulleRJRobertsJTSpencerMC (eds) Climate Obstruction across Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 320–346.
20.
RaworthK (2018) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
21.
RockströmJGuptaJQinD, et al. (2023) Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature619(7968): 102–111.
22.
RockströmJKotzéLMilutinovićS, et al. (2024) The planetary commons: A new paradigm for safeguarding Earth-regulating systems in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(5): e2301531121.
23.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneK, et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature461(7263): 472–475.
24.
SchepelmannP (2022) Towards a green new deal: lessons after a lost decade. In: Culture, Practice & Europeanization7(2): 275–291.
25.
SchmelzerMEversbergD (2017) Beyond growth, capitalism, and industrialism? Consensus, divisions and currents within the emerging movement for sustainable degrowth. Interface: A Journal on Social Movements9(1): 327–356.
26.
Seeleib-KaiserM (2008) Multiple and multi-dimensional welfare state transformations. In: Seeleib-KaiserM (ed.) Welfare State Transformations: Comparative Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 210–221.
27.
SteffenWRichardsonKRockströmJ, et al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science347(6223): 1259855.
28.
ZimmermannKGengnagelV (2023) Mapping the social dimension of the European Green Deal. European Journal of Social Security25(4): 523–544.