Customer friendliness in tax systems typically characterized by control and enforcement appears to be a contradiction in terms. But many tax agencies, like other types of public organizations, have become more customer-oriented in the last few decades. This article, comparing the administration of tax systems in Norway and the USA, describes and analyzes the driving forces behind the consumer orientation movement in tax administration in the two nations and the dilemmas and effects of trying to balance control and service. Using a broad transformative perspective, we analyze structural and cultural changes in tax administration that are related to the increase in customer orientation and also consider the symbolic aspects of catering more to taxpayers. Norway and the USA have experienced similar structural reforms, but the two countries deviate rather sharply in other respects, particularly in the much larger impact of consumer-oriented reforms in the USA.
Aberbach, J.D. and Christensen, T. (2005) `Citizens and Consumers: An NPM Dilemma', Public Management Review7(2): 225—46.
2.
Aberbach, J.D. and Rockman, B.A. (2000) In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
3.
Ballard, T.N. (2002) `IRS' 10 Deadly Sins to Remain Deadly', GovEXEC.com (April), URL (consulted July 2005): http://www.govexec.com
4.
Boin, A. (2001) Crafting Public Institutions: Leadership in Two Prison Systems. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
5.
Brunsson, N. (1989) The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.
6.
Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (1993) The Reforming Organization. London and New York : Routledge.
7.
Cappelen, A.W. and Von Simson, K. (2004) `Notat om Ungdommers Holdninger til Arbeid' [Report on the Attitudes of Young People towards Work], memo, Directorate of Taxes, Oslo.
8.
Christensen, T. (2003) `Narratives of Norwegian Governance: Elaborating the Strong State', Public Administration81(1): 163—90.
9.
Christensen, T. (2006) `Smart Policy?', in M. Moran, M. Rein and R.E. Goodin (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 129—35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2001a) `A Transformative Perspective on Administrative Reforms', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, pp. 93—119. Aldershot : Ashgate.
11.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2001b) `New Public Management: Undermining Political Control?', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
12.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2003) `Administrative Reform Policy: The Challenges of Turning Symbols into Practice', Public Organization Review3(1): 3—27.
13.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2004) `Governmental Autonomization and Control: The Norwegian Way', Public Administration and Development24(2): 129—35.
14.
Christensen, T. and Peters, B.G. (1999) Structure, Culture and Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Norway and the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
Crenshaw, A.B. (2004) `IRS Reshapes Workforce: Focus on Tax Enforcement: Focus on Tax Enforcment, Electronic Filing Prompts Move', Washington Post (8 January), URL (consulted January 2004): http://www.washingtonpost.com
16.
Crenshaw, A.B. (2005) `Bigger IRS Enforcement Budget Sought', Washington Post (2 February), URL (consulted February 2005): http://www.washingtonpost.com
17.
Cropper, C.M. (1998) `Tangled Tale of the Oilman vs. the I.R.S.: What a Senate Panel Didn't Hear', New York Times (2 August), URL (consulted November 1999): http://www.nytimes.com
18.
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Directorate of Taxes (1999) ` Rapport fra Brukerundersøkelse: Skattebetalernes syn på Skattemyndighetene ' [Report from a User Survey: The Tax Payers' Views on the Tax Authorities]. Oslo: Feedback Research & Consulting.
20.
Directorate of Taxes (2002) ` Rapport fra Brukerundersøkelse: Selvangivelsen for 2001' [Report from a User Survey: Tax Return 2001]. Oslo: The Empower Group.
21.
Directorate of Taxes (2003) ` Næringslivets syn på Skatteetaten: Rapport fra en Undersøkelse Gjennomført for Skattedirektoratet' [The Business Community's Views on the Tax Authorities: Report from a Survey made for the Directorate of Taxes]. Oslo: Sentio Analyse og Rådgivning AS.
22.
Edelman, M. (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
Egeberg, M. (2003) `How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective', in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration , pp. 116—26. London: Sage.
24.
GovEXEC.com (1999) `10 Deadly Sins', URL (consulted July 2005): http://www.govexec.com
25.
Halligan, J. (2004) `Advocacy & Innovation in Inter-Agency Management: The Case of Centrelink', paper presented at the 20th Anniversary Conference of the Structure and Organization of Government Research Committee of the International Political Science Association, Vancouver, 15—17 June.
26.
Hersey, R.D. (1997) `I.R.S. Admits Taxpayers' Rights Are Abused by Improper Tactics', New York Times (13 December), URL (consulted November 1999): http://www.nytimes.com
27.
Internal Revenue Service IRS.gov (2004) `IRS Strategic Plan Focuses on Service, Compliance, Modernization', IR-2004—95 (15 July), URL (consulted June 2005): http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/
28.
IRS Stategic Plan (2005—9), URL (consulted June 2005): http://www.irs.gov
29.
Johnston, D.C. (2002) `Departing Chief Says I.R.S. Losing War on Tax Cheats', New York Times (5 November), URL (consulted November 2002): http://www.nytimes.com
30.
Johnston, D.C. (2003) Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich — and Cheat Everyone Else. New York: Portfolio/Penguin Group.
31.
Kettl, D.F. (2000) The Global Public Management Revolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32.
Krasner, S.D. (1988) `Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective', Comparative Political Studies21(1): 66—94.
33.
Kristof, K.M. (2003) `After IRS Revamp, Focus Is on Tax Cheats', Business Section, Los Angeles Times (9 November): C3.
34.
Lægreid, P. and Roness, P.G. (1999) `Administrative Reform as Organized Attention', in M. Egeberg and P. Lægreid (eds) Organizing Political Institutions, pp. 301—30. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
35.
MacFarland, M. (2003) `IRS Nominee Pledges to Step Up Enforcement, Modernization' , GovExec.com Daily Briefing (18 March), URL (consulted March 2003): http://www.govexec.com
36.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1983) `Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us About Government', American Political Science Review77(2): 281—97.
37.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
38.
Melhus, O.C. (2003) `Offentlige Servicekontorer: Hvordan Reagerer Statlige Etater på et Moderniseringsprosjekt Initiert av Sentrale Myndigheter' [Public One-stop Shops: How to get Public Agencies to React Towards a Modernization Project Initiated by Central Authorities?], MA thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo .
39.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) `Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340—63.
40.
National Performance Review (1993) ` From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less'. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41.
Norges Offentlige Utredninger (NOU) (1993) `Reorganisering av Skatte- og Avgiftsadministrasjonen' [Reorganizing the Tax- and Customs Administration], Report No. 1. Oslo : Ministry of Finance.
42.
Peters, B.G. (1991) The Politics of Taxation: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Peters, B.G. (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London and New York: Pinter.
44.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
45.
Pulliam, D. (2004) `Agencies reach all-time High in Customer Satisfaction' , GovExecu.com, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.govexec.com
46.
Rossotti, C.O. (2005) Many Unhappy Returns: One Man's Quest to Turn Around the Most Unpopular Organization in America. Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
47.
Røvik, K.A. (1996) `Deinstitutionalization and the Logic of Fashion ', in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds) Translating Organizational Change, pp. 139—72. New York: De Gruyter .
48.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001) `National, International and Transnational Construction of New Public Management', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, pp. 43—72. Aldershot: Ashgate.
49.
Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.
50.
Steinmo, S. (1993) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
51.
the Federal Government: the IRS Model. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government (http://www.businessofgovernment.org).
52.
Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) ( 2005) `IRS at Work: IRS History', Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse, URL (consulted July 2005): http://trac.syr.edu
53.
United States General Accounting Office (GAO) ( 1997) `High-Risk Series: An Overview', GAO/HR-97—1 (February). Washington DC: United States Government General Accounting Office.
54.
United States Senate, Committee on Finance ( 1997) `Practices and Procedures of the Internal Revenue Service' , S. Hrg. 105—190, 105th Cong., 1st sess . (25 September). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
55.
United States Senate, Committee on Finance ( 1998a) `IRS Restructuring', S. Hrg. 105—529, 105th Cong., 2nd sess. (28 January). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
56.
United States Senate, Committee on Finance ( 1998b) `IRS Oversight', S. Hrg. 105—598, 105th Cong., 2nd sess. (29 April). Washington, DC: U.S. Governmnt Printing Office.
57.
White, J.R. (2003) `Answers to Questions from a 20 May 2003 Joint Committee on Taxation Oversight Hearing on the Internal Revenue Service' (27 June), GAO-03—962R IRS Oversight. Washington DC: United States Government General Accounting Office.
58.
White J.R. and Dacey, R.F. (2004) `Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight, House Ways and Means Committee: Internal Revenue Service: Assessment of Fiscal Year 2005 Budget Request and 2004 Filing Season Performance' (30 March), GAO-04—560T. Washington DC: United States Government General Accounting Office.
