How does presidentialism affect various forms of representation? All else being equal, presidentialism is likely to impede the prospects for ‘mandate’ representation but enhance the prospects for ‘accountability’ representation. The degree of mandate or accountability representation is a function of the balance of powers and the degree of separation of purpose between the branches. Strong presidentialism works against mandate representation by freeing the president from his/her legislative copartisans and promoting ‘policy switching’. In contrast, a high ‘separation of purpose’, defined primarily by a country’s electoral institutions, clarifies for voters the responsibility of each branch for policy. Thus presidentialism - under certain common institutional configurations - provides accountability representation to a degree overlooked by existing research.
Adsera, Alicia
, Carles Boix and Mark Payne (2000) ‘Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government’, Working Paper 438. New York: Inter-American Development Bank Research Department.
2.
Anderson, Christopher J.
(1995) ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for Coalition Governments’, Comparative Political Studies28(3): 350-383.
3.
Anderson, Christopher J.
(2000) ‘Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective’, Electoral Studies19(2-3): 151-170.
4.
Archer, Ron
and Matthew S. Shugart (1997) ‘The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Dominance in Colombia’, in Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart (eds) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, pp. 110-159. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cantú, María Elena (2001) ‘Juicio Ciudadano a Legisladores’, Reforma (Mexico City): 25 November.
6.
Carey, John
(1996) Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Carey, John
and Matthew S. Shugart (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank-Ordering of Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies14(4): 417-439.
8.
Chappell, Henry
and Linda Veiga (2000) ‘Economics and Elections in Western Europe: 1960-97’, Electoral Studies19: 183-197.
9.
Cox, Gary
(1987) The Efficient Secret. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cox, Gary
and Mathew McCubbins (2001) ‘The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy’, in Stephan Haggard and Mathew McCubbins (eds) Presidents, Parliaments and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Cox, Gary W.
and Scott Morgenstern (2001) ‘Latin America’s Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents’, Comparative Politics33(2): 171-189, 251.
12.
Crisp, Brian F.
(2000) Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Interest Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Fiorina, Morris
(1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter
, Richard Hofferbert and Ian Budge (1994) Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
Lewis-Beck, Michael
and Mary Stegmaier (2000) ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science3: 183-219.
16.
Linz, Juan
(1990) ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’, Journal of Democracy1: 51-69.
17.
Linz, Juan
(1994) ‘Democracy, Presidential or Parliamentary: Does it Make a Difference?’ in Juan Linz and Arturo Valenzuela (eds) The Failure of Presidential Government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Mainwaring, Scott
(1993) ‘Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination’, Comparative Political Studies26: 198-228.
19.
Mainwaring, Scott
and Matthew S. Shugart (1997) ‘Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal’, Comparative Politics (Jul.): 449-471.
20.
Manin, Bernard
, Adam Przeworski and Susan C. Stokes (1999) ‘Elections and Representation’, in Adam Przeworskiet al. (eds) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, pp. 29-54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Pacek, Alex
and Benjamin Radcliff (1995) ‘Economic Voting and the Welfare State: A Cross National Analysis’, Journal of Politics57: 44-61.
22.
Paldam, Martin
(1991) ‘How Robust is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades’, in Helmut Norpoth, Michael S. Lewis-Beck and Jean-Dominique Lafay (eds) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Persson, Torsten
, Gerard Roland and Guido Tsebellini (1997) ‘Separation of Powers and Political Accountability’, Quarterly Journal of Economics112(4): 1163-1203.
24.
Philip, G.
(1998) ‘The New Populism, Presidentialism and Market-Orientated Reform in Spanish South America’, Government and Opposition33(1): 81-97.
25.
Pitkin, Hannah
(1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
Powell, G. Bingham
(2001) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Powell, G. Bingham
, and Guy D. Whitten (1993) ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science37: 391-414.
28.
Przeworski, Adamet al.
(eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Remmer, Karen
(1991) ‘The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s’, American Political Science Review85: 777-800.
30.
Remmer, Karen
(2001) ‘Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin America’, Paper presented at the 2001 Latin American Studies Association Meeting, Washington.
31.
Roberts, Kenneth M.
(1995) ‘Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case’, World Politics48(1): 82.
32.
Samuels, David
(2002) ‘Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Behavior’, Comparative Political Studies35(4): 461-483.
33.
Samuels, David
and Richard Snyder (2001) ‘The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective’, British Journal of Political Science31(3): 651-671.
34.
Schattschneider, E. E.
(1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart and Co.
35.
Shugart, Matthew. S.
(1995) ‘The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government’, American Political Science Review89(2): 327-343.
36.
Shugart, Matthew S.
(1999) ‘Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and the Provision of Collective Goods in Less-Developed Countries’, Constitutional Political Economy10(1): 53-88.
37.
Shugart, Matthew S.
(2001) ‘“Extreme” Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative’, in Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Shugart, Matthew S.
and John M. Carey (1992) Presidents and Assemblies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Shugart, Matthew S.
and Stephan Haggard (2001) ‘Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems’, in Stephan Haggard and Mathew McCubbins (eds) Presidents, Parliaments and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Siavelis, Peter M.
(2000) ‘Disconnected Fire Alarms and Ineffective Police Patrols: Legislative Oversight in Postauthoritarian Chile’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs42(1): 71-98.
41.
Stepan, Alfred
and Cindy Skach (1994) ‘Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism’, World Politics46(Oct.): 1-22.
42.
Stokes, Susan
(1999) ‘What do Policy Switches Tell us About Democracy?’ in Adam Przeworskiet al. (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, pp. 98-130. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Sundquist, James L.
(1992) Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
44.
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle
(1996) ‘When Electoral and Party Institutions Interact to Produce Caudillo Politics: The Case of Honduras’, Electoral Studies15(3): 327-337.
45.
Weyland, Kurt
(2001) ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’, Comparative Politics34(1): 1-22.
46.
Wilkin, Samet al.
(1997) ‘From Argentina to Zambia: a World-Wide Test of Economic Voting’, Electoral Studies16: 301-316.
47.
Wilson, Bruce M.
(1998) Costa Rica: Politics, Economics, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
