An official whose experience increases over time may overweight old information when making decisions. If the state of nature changes over time, the official’s performance eventually worsens with experience. Though a new official may initially perform worse than his predecessor, maximizing average performance requires that officials are regularly replaced.
AdelmanLBresnikTABlackPKMarvinFFSakSG (1996) Research with Patriot air defense officers: examining information order effects. Human Factors38(2): 250–261.
2.
AimoneJBWilesJGageFH (2009) Computational influence of adult neurogenesis on memory encoding. Neuron61(2): 187–202.
3.
BarronDNWestEHannanMT (1994) A time to grow and a time to die: growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914-1990. American Journal of Sociology100(2): 381–421.
4.
BrayM (1982) Learning, estimation, and the stability of rational expectations equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory26(2): 318–339.
5.
CampbellAWhiteheadJFinkelsteinS (2009) Why good leaders make bad decisions. Harvard Business ReviewFebruary, pp. 60–66.
6.
Di TellaRMacCullochR (2006) Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives20(1): 25–46.
7.
FreyBS (2005) ‘Just forget it’ memory distortions as bounded rationality. Mind & Society4(1): 13–25.
8.
GlazerARobbinsM (1985) How elections matter: a study of US Senators. Public Choice46(2): 163–172.
9.
GlazerAGrofmanBRobbinsM (1987) Partisan and incumbency effects of 1970s congressional redistricting. American Journal of Political Science31(3): 680–707.
10.
GronkePNewmanB (2003) FDR to Clinton, Mueller to ?: a field essay on presidential approval. Political Research Quarterly56(4): 501–512.
11.
HogarthRMEinhornHJ (1992) Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology24(1): 1–55.
12.
KatzR (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly27(1): 81–104.
13.
KrosznerRSStratmannT (1998) Interest-group competition and the organization of Congress: theory and evidence from financial services’ Political Action Committees. American Economic Review88(5): 1163–1187.
14.
KrosznerRSStratmannT (2000) Congressional committees as reputation-building mechanisms. Business and Politics2(1): 35–52.
15.
LodgeMMcGrawKMStrohP (1989) An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review83(2): 399–419.
16.
NisbettRERossL (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Human Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
PietersRGMBijmoltTHA (1997) Consumer memory for television advertising: a field study of duration, serial position, and competition effects. Journal of Consumer Research23(4): 362–372.
18.
RabinMSchragJL (1999) First impressions matter: a model of confirmatory bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics114(1): 37–82.
19.
Ranger-MooreJ (1997) Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. American Sociological Review62(6): 903–921.
20.
RothenbergLSSandersM (2000) Severing the electoral connection: shirking in the contemporary Congress. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 310–319.
21.
SehulsterJR (1989) Content and temporal structure of autobiographical knowledge: remembering twenty-five seasons at the Metropolitan Opera. Memory and Cognition17(5): 590–606.
22.
SkirbekkV (2002) Variations in productivity over the life span: a review and some implications. Interim Report IR-02-061, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
23.
StratmannT (2000) Congressional voting over legislative careers: shifting positions and changing constraints. American Political Science Review94(3): 665–676.
24.
TuckelP (1983) Length of incumbency and the reelection chances of US senators. Legislative Studies Quarterly8(2): 283–288.
