Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The significance of investigating innovation in academic medical centers has been underscored, as they are recognized as leaders in frontline innovation and accelerators of healthcare advancement. The factors that contribute to innovation success, particularly those associated with benefits, can be identified by examining innovation attributes in relation to innovation process stages. This study aimed to understanding the innovation process by identifying the key factors that characterize innovation and their outcomes in academic medical centers. The central research questions were: what are the main attributes of innovation in an academic medical center? and which innovation attributes influence the outcomes of innovation in an academic medical center? Clinical directors from one academic medical center in Italy, Careggi University Hospital, responded to a questionnaire. Exploratory factor and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data. The findings highlighted the crucial role of middle managers in promoting and developing significant high-quality innovations. Our study deepens the innovation attribute framework and enables a better understanding of the relationship between attributes and benefits in the healthcare context. From a practical perspective, our study equips academic medical center administrators with a tool to evaluate innovation attributes and their relationship with outcomes, enabling better leverage of the potential benefits.

Keywords

innovation attributes innovation benefits academic medical centers Italy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thune

Mina

. Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: a literature review and research agenda. Res Policy 2016; 45(8): 1545–1557.

Schultz

Zippel-Schultz

Salomo

. Hospital innovation portfolios: key determinants of size and innovativeness. Health Care Manage Rev 2012; 37(2): 132–143.

Hsieh

. Hospital innovation and its impact on customer-perceived quality of care: a process-based evaluation approach. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 2015; 26(1-2): 46–61.

Meer

Ezzeddine

Chao

, et al. Pursuing innovation in academic medical centers: models, activities, and influential factors. Health Care Manage Rev 2023; 48(2): 161–174.

Cresswell

Williams

Carlile

, et al. Accelerating innovation in health care: insights from a qualitative inquiry into United Kingdom and United States innovation centers. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(9): e19644.

Rogers

. Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, 2003.

Adams

Tranfield

Denyer

. A taxonomy of innovation: configurations of attributes in healthcare innovations. Int J Innov Mgt 2011; 15(2): 359–392.

Adams

. Perceptions of innovations: exploring and developing innovation classification. PhD Thesis, University of Cranfield, UK, 2003.

Syeed

Poudel

Ngorsuraches

, et al. Characterizing attributes of innovation of technologies for healthcare: a systematic review. J Med Econ 2022; 25(1): 1158–1166.

10.

Moreira

MRA

Gherman

Sousa

PSA

. Does innovation influence the performance of healthcare organizations? Innov 2017; 19(3): 335–352.

11.

Adams

Tranfield

Denyer

. Process antecedents of challenging, under‐cover and readily‐adopted innovations. J Health Organ Manag 2013; 27(1): 42–63.

12.

Greenhalgh

Robert

Macfarlane

, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004; 82(4): 581–629.

13.

Huybrechts

Declercq

Verté

, et al. Will the implementation process for goal-oriented primary care succeed? A qualitative study investigating five perceived attributes of goal-oriented care. Soc Sci Med 2023; 331: 116048.

14.

Cranley

Cummings

Profetto-McGrath

, et al. Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e014384.

15.

Légére

Ratté

Gravel

, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73(1): 526–535.

16.

Urquhart

Porter

Sargeant

, et al. Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting. Implement Sci 2014; 9(1): 121.

17.

Panichakarn

, et al. Exploring the adoption intention of long-term care regulatory systems in Guangxi, China: the role of innovation attributes and perceived risk. 2025; 14(3): 575–586.

18.

Reynolds

O'Dochartaigh

Secchi

, et al. Framing innovation success, failure, and transformation: systematic literature review. J Prod Innovat Manag 2023; 42(1): 1–26.

19.

Mariello

. The five stages of successful innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 2007; 48(3): 8.

20.

Rajapathirana

RPJ

Hui

. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. J Innov Knowl 2018; 3(1): 44–55.

21.

Nembhard

Alexander

Hoff

, et al. Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? Insights from management research. Acad Manag Perspect 2009; 23(1): 24–42.

22.

Tucker

Nembhard

Edmondson

. Implementing new practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Manage Sci 2007; 53(6): 894–907.

23.

Porzsolt

Ghosh

Kaplan

. Qualitative assessment of innovations in healthcare provision. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9(50): 50–57.

24.

Rautakivi

. Organizational intelligence, efficacy and adaptability in changing environments. In: Taraseina

Siriprasertchok

Pijitbandan

, et al. (eds). Public Administration in the time of regional change, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Public Management 2013, pp. 1–7. paper no. 63.

25.

Hayes

Eljiz

Dadich

, et al. Trialability, observability and risk reduction accelerating individual innovation adoption decisions. J Health Organ Manag 2015; 29(2): 271–294.

26.

Brewster

Curry

Cherlin

, et al. Integrating new practices: a qualitative study of how hospital innovations become routine. Implement Sci 2015; 10: 168–212.

27.

French

Ferlie

Fulop

. The international spread of academic health science centres: a scoping review and the case of policy transfer to England. Health Policy 2014; 117(3): 382–391.

28.

Ovseiko

Davies

Buchan

. Organizational models of emerging academic health science centers in England. Acad Med 2010; 85(8): 1282–1289.

29.

Liu

Zhang

Jiraporn

. Firm risk-taking and CEO visibility. Q J Financ 2016; 06(3): 1650010.

30.

Dukerich

Golden

Shortell

. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: the impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Adm Sci Q 2002; 47(3): 507–533.

31.

Gioia

Schultz

Corley

. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad Manag Rev 2000; 25(1): 63–81.

32.

Malik

Kabiraj

Lestan

. Prestige of the decision ecology and risk-taking in R&D project in the biopharmaceutical sector. Glob Bus Rev 2022; 0: 1–27.

33.

Ronay

Hippel

. The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physical risk taking in young men. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2010; 1: 57–64.

34.

Palm

Persson Fischier

. What managers find important for implementation of innovations in the healthcare sector–practice through six management perspectives. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11(10): 2261–2271.

35.

Leal-Rodríguez

Roldán

Leal

, et al. Knowledge management, relational learning, and the effectiveness of innovation outcomes. Serv Ind J 2013; 33(13-14): 1294–1311.

36.

Jerome-D’Emilia

Begun

. Diffusion of breast conserving surgery in medical communities. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60(1): 143–151.

37.

Field

. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. : Sage, 2013.

38.

Tabachnick

Fidell

. Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon, 2001.

39.

Hair

Black

Babin

, et al. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. 7th ed. Pearson, 2010.

40.

Nunnally

. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1978.

41.

Bikmoradi

Brommels

Shoghli

, et al. Requirements for effective academic leadership in Iran: a nominal group technique exercise. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 24–27.

42.

Brandt

Znotka

. Influencing factors and outcomes of entrepreneurial activities in German healthcare organizations, a qualitative study. Int J Healthc Manag 2021; 14(3): 805–812.

43.

Weick

Quinn

. Organizational change and development. Annu Rev Psychol 1999; 50: 361–386.

44.

Del Vecchio

Giacomelli

Sartirana

. Professionals in public services: profiles and regulatory governance. In: Ongaro

Barbati

Mascio

, et al. (eds). Public Administration in Italy: The Science and the Profession. Palgrave Macmillan, 2025.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.49 MB

An exploratory study on attributes and benefits of innovation in academic medical centers: Evidence from Careggi University Hospital

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material