The unintended consequences of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pay-for-performance structures on safety-net hospitals and the low-income,medically vulnerable population
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2017
The unintended consequences of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pay-for-performance structures on safety-net hospitals and the low-income,medically vulnerable population
Safety-net hospitals are hospitals with patient mix that is substantially composed of the uninsured, underinsured, and low-income, medically vulnerable patient populations. They are the hospitals of last resort for poor patients. This article examined the impact of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pay-for-performance reimbursement policies on the financial viability of safety-net hospitals. Studies showed that these policies, which are based on the principle of reward and punishment, might have unintentionally placed safety-net hospitals on financial disadvantage compared to other hospital organizations. Several studies implied that these payment structures might have resulted in a situation where safety-net hospitals that are serving poor patient populations become more susceptible to penalties than hospitals that are serving affluent patients.
LewinMEAltmanSH. America's health care safety net: intact but endangered, Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine : National Academy Press, 2000.
2.
JhaAKOravEJEpsteinAM. Low-quality, high-cost hospitals, mainly in south, care for sharply higher shares of elderly black, Hispanic, and Medicaid patients. Health Aff2011; 30: 1904–1911.
3.
NeuhausenKDavisACNeedlemanJ. Disproportionate-share hospital payment reductions may threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood)2014; 33: 988–996.
4.
VazLEKleinmanKPKawaiAT. Impact of Medicare's hospital-acquired condition policy on infections in safety net and non-safety net hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2015; 36: 649–655.
5.
Safety-net hospital systems transformations in the era of health reform. – Blue Shield Safety Net Full Final Report.pdf. Austin, Texas USA: Texas Health Institute, 2015.
6.
KahnHA. What changes are needed to enable the safety net to become a provider of choice? And how does it get done?J Health Polit Policy Law2015; 40: 395–401.
7.
Program NRHR. 59 rural hospital closures: January 2010–present. Sheps Center, University of North Carolina, 2015.
8.
GilmanMHockenberryJMAdamsEK. The Financial effect of value-based purchasing and the hospital readmissions reduction program on safety-net hospitals in 2014: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med2015; 163: 427–436.
9.
GilmanMAdamsEKHockenberryJM. Safety-net hospitals more likely than other hospitals to fare poorly under Medicare's value-based purchasing. Health Aff (Millwood)2015; 34: 398–405.
10.
GilmanMAdamsEKHockenberryJM. California safety-net hospitals likely to be penalized by ACA value, readmission, and meaningful-use programs. Health Aff (Millwood)2014; 33: 1314–1322.
11.
KahnCNAultTPotetzL. Assessing Medicare’s hospital pay-for-performance programs and whether they are achieving their goals. Health Aff2015; 34: 1281–1288.
12.
NeuhausenKKatzMH. Patient satisfaction and safety-net hospitals: carrots, not sticks, are a better approach. Arch Intern Med2012; 172: 1202–1203.
BoccutiCCasillasG. Aiming for fewer hospital U-turns: the Medicare Hospital Readmission Reduction Program, Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2015.
USGAO UGAO. Hospital value-based purchasing: initial results show modest effects on Medicare payments and no apparent change in quality-of-care trends. 2015.
17.
Kind AJH, Jencks S, Brock J, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161: 765–774 10p.
RossJSChaSSEpsteinAJ. Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction at urban safety-net hospitals. Health Aff2007; 26: 238–248.
25.
ReiterKLNolesMPinkGH. Uncompensated care burden may mean financial vulnerability for rural hospitals in states that did not expand Medicaid. Health Aff (Millwood)2015; 34: 1721–1729.
26.
HolmesGMSlifkinRTRandolphRK. The effect of rural hospital closures on community economic health. Health Serv Res2006; 41: 467–85.
27.
BerensonJDotyMMAbramsMK. Achieving better quality of care for low-income populations: the roles of health insurance and the medical home in reducing health inequities. Issue Brief (Commonwealth Fund)2012; 11: 1–18.
28.
BowserDMUtzSGlickD. A systematic review of the relationship of diabetes mellitus, depression, and missed appointments in a low-income uninsured population. Arch Psychiatr Nurs2010; 24: 317–329.
29.
ShiLStevensGD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. J Gen Intern Med2005; 20: 148–154.
30.
GoldmanLEHaneuseSJPAMigliorettiDL. An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations. Med Care2008; 46: 701–708.
31.
BroylesRWNarineLBrandtENJr. Equity concerns with the use of hospital services by the medically vulnerable. J Health Care Poor Underserved2000; 11: 343–360.
32.
BroylesRWMcAuleyWJBaird-HolmesD. The medically vulnerable: their health risks, health status, and use of physician care. J Health Care Poor Underserved1999; 10: 186–200.
