This study uses multiple waves of the HILDA survey to examine how partnered women’s relative working hours affect life satisfaction, accounting for unpaid domestic labour. Women who work more hours than their male partners report significantly lower life satisfaction, primarily due to non-conformity to prevailing gender role expectations in paid work. The decline is greatest among women who also shoulder a disproportionate share of unpaid labour, with well-being losses stemming almost equally from norm non-conformity and time pressures. These findings highlight the enduring impact of gender norms and underscore the need for policies that address both labour market inequality and unequal domestic responsibilities.
AkerlofGAKrantonRE (2000) Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3): 715–753.
2.
AkerlofGAKrantonRE (2010) Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AlesinaAGiulianoP (2014) Family ties. In: AghionPDurlaufSN (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 177–215.
4.
AlesinaAGiulianoPNunnN (2013) On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics128(2): 469–530.
5.
AshrafNBauNNunnN, et al. (2020) Bride price and female education. Journal of Political Economy128(2): 591–641.
6.
BaxterJHewittB (2013) Negotiating domestic labor: women’s earnings and housework time in Australia. Feminist Economics19(1): 29–53.
7.
BerkSF (2012) The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. New York: Springer.
8.
BertrandM (2018) Coase lecture – the glass ceiling. Economica85(337): 205–231.
9.
BertrandM (2020) Gender in the twenty-first century. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings110: 1–24.
10.
BertrandMKamenicaEPanJ (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics130(2): 571–614.
11.
BinderAJLamD (2022) Is there a male-breadwinner norm? The hazards of inferring preferences from marriage market outcomes. Journal of Human Resources57(6): 1885–1914.
12.
BisinAVerdierT (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory97(2): 298–319.
13.
BittmanMEnglandPSayerL, et al. (2003) When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology109(1): 186–214.
14.
BlairSLJohnsonMP (1992) Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: the intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family54(3): 570–581.
15.
BlanchflowerDGOswaldAJ (2008) Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?Social Science & Medicine66(8): 1733–1749.
16.
BlauFDKahnLM (2017) The gender wage gap: extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature55(3): 789–865.
17.
BlauFDKahnLMLiuAYH, et al. (2013) The transmission of women’s fertility, human capital, and work orientation across immigrant generations. Journal of Population Economics26: 405–435.
18.
BlomNHewittB (2020) Becoming a female-breadwinner household in Australia: changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family82(4): 1340–1357.
19.
BoothALVan OursJC (2009) Hours of work and gender identity: does part-time work make the family happier?Economica76(301): 176–196.
20.
BoserupE (1970) Woman’s Role in Economic Development. London: George Allen and Unwin.
21.
BowlegL (2012) The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health102(7): 1267–1273.
22.
BudgeSLOroveczJJOwenJJ, et al. (2018) The relationship between conformity to gender norms, sexual orientation, and gender identity for sexual minorities. Counselling Psychology Quarterly31(1): 79–97.
23.
BurnsLOliveLTurnerA, et al. (2025) The role of gender norm conformity in men’s psychological help-seeking and treatment engagement: a scoping review. Journal of Mental Health. Epub ahead of print 3 June 2025. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2512304.
24.
BussDMSchmittDP (2019) Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology70(1): 77–110.
25.
CarterMFFranzTMGruschowJL, et al. (2019) The gender conformity conundrum: the effects of irrelevant gender norms on public conformity. The Journal of Social Psychology159(6): 761–765.
26.
CollinsPH (2015) Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology41(1): 1–20.
27.
CookeLP (2006) “Doing” gender in context: household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United State. American Journal of Sociology112(2): 442–472.
28.
CraigLMullanK (2012) Australian fathers’ work and family time in comparative and temporal perspective. Journal of Family Studies18(2–3): 165–174.
29.
DragoRBlackDWoodenM (2005) Female breadwinner families: their existence, persistence and sources. Journal of Sociology41(4): 343–362.
30.
EaglyAHWoodW (2012) Social role theory. In: Van LangePAMKruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2. London: Sage, 458–476.
31.
EydalGBGíslasonIVRostgaardT, et al. (2015) Trends in parental leave in the Nordic countries: has the forward March of gender equality halted?Community, Work & Family18(2): 167–181.
32.
FegleyTIsraelKF (2020) The disutility of labor. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics23(2): 171–179.
33.
FernándezR (2013) Cultural change as learning: the evolution of female labor force participation over a century. American Economic Review103(1): 472–500.
34.
FernándezRFogliAOlivettiC (2004) Mothers and sons: preference formation and female labor force dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1249–1299.
35.
FlècheSLepinteurAPowdthaveeN (2020) Gender norms, fairness and relative working hours within households. Labour Economics65: 101866.
36.
FortinNM (2005) Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy21(3): 416–438.
37.
GalorOÖzakÖSaridA (2020) Linguistic traits and human capital formation. AEA Papers and Proceedings110: 309–313.
38.
GashVPlagnolAC (2021) The partner pay gap: associations between spouses’ relative earnings and life satisfaction among UK couples. Work, Employment and Society35(3): 563–582.
39.
GayVSantacreu-VasutEShohamA (2013) The grammatical origins of gender roles. BEHL Working Paper Series WP2013-03.
40.
GiulianoP (2020) Gender and culture. Oxford Review of Economic Policy36(4): 944–961.
41.
GneezyULeonardKLListJA (2009) Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica77(5): 1637–1664.
42.
GoldinC (2014) A grand gender convergence: its last chapter. American Economic Review104(4): 1091–1119.
43.
GoldinC (2024) Nobel lecture: an evolving economic force. American Economic Review114(6): 1515–1539.
44.
Gonalons-PonsPGanglM (2021) Marriage and masculinity: male-breadwinner culture, unemployment, and separation risk in 29 countries. American Sociological Review86(3): 465–502.
45.
GrosjeanPKhattarR (2019) It’s raining men! Hallelujah? The long-run consequences of male-biased sex ratios. The Review of Economic Studies86(2): 723–754.
46.
HalabyCN (2004) Panel models in sociological research: theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology30(1): 507–544.
47.
HtunMWeldonSL (2012) The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review106(3): 548–569.
48.
JohnstonDWSchurerSShieldsMA (2014) Maternal gender role attitudes, human capital investment, and labour supply of sons and daughters. Oxford Economic Papers66(3): 631–659.
49.
KaruMTremblayDG (2018) Fathers on parental leave: an analysis of rights and take-up in 29 countries. Community, Work & Family21(3): 344–362.
50.
KillewaldA (2016) Money, work, and marital stability: assessing change in the gendered determinants of divorce. American Sociological Review81(4): 696–719.
51.
KlevenHLandaisCSøgaardJE (2019) Children and gender inequality: evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics11(4): 181–209.
52.
LennonMCRosenfieldS (1994) Relative fairness and the division of housework: the importance of options. American Journal of Sociology100(2): 506–531.
53.
LowesS (2022) Kinship structure and the family: Evidence from the Matrilineal Belt. National Bureau of Economic Research No. w30509.
54.
LuhmannMHofmannWEidM, et al. (2012) Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(3): 592–615.
55.
LyngstadTHNoackTTuftePA (2011) Pooling of economic resources: a comparison of Norwegian married and cohabiting couples. European Sociological Review27(5): 624–635.
56.
LyonetteCCromptonR (2015) Sharing the load? Partners’ relative earnings and the division of domestic labour. Work, Employment and Society29(1): 23–40.
57.
McMunnABirdLWebbE, et al. (2020) Gender divisions of paid and unpaid work in contemporary UK couples. Work, Employment and Society34(2): 155–173.
58.
MorganSLWinshipC (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
NielsonMGSchroederKMMartinCL, et al. (2020) Investigating the relation between gender typicality and pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles83(9): 523–535.
60.
OlivettiCPetrongoloB (2017) The economic consequences of family policies: lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1): 205–230.
61.
PearseRConnellR (2016) Gender norms and the economy: insights from social research. Feminist Economics22(1): 30–53.
62.
Pleck JH and National Council on Family Relations (1985) Working Wives, Working Husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
63.
RätzelS (2012) Labour supply, life satisfaction, and the (dis)utility of work. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics114(4): 1160–1181.
64.
RismanBJ (2004) Gender as a social structure: theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society18(4): 429–450.
65.
RogersSJDeBoerDD (2001) Changes in wives’ income: effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family63(2): 458–472.
66.
RossCEMirowskyJHuberJ (1983) Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review48(6): 809–823.
67.
SallandJ (2018) Income comparison, gender roles and life satisfaction. Applied Economics Letters25(20): 1436–1439.
68.
SchmittDPRealoAVoracekM, et al. (2008) Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(1): 168–182.
69.
StoetGGearyDC (2018) The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science29(4): 581–593.
70.
SyrdaJ (2023) Gendered housework: spousal relative income, parenthood and traditional gender identity norms. Work, Employment and Society37(3): 794–813.
71.
ThompsonL (1991) Family work: women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues12(2): 181–196.
72.
ValentovaM (2025) How do parents care together? Dyadic parental leave take-up strategies, wages and workplace characteristics. Work, Employment and Society39(1): 91–114.
WestbrookLSchiltK (2014) Doing gender, determining gender: transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society28(1): 32–57.
75.
WestmoreB (2024) Fully realising the economic potential of women in Australia. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1793.
76.
WoodWEaglyAH (2015) Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles73(11–12): 461–473.
77.
WoodenMHahnM (2014) Female breadwinner families. Families, Incomes and Jobs9(57): 57–60.
78.
YogevSBrettJ (1985) Perceptions of the division of housework and child care and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family47(3): 609–618.
79.
ZinovyevaNTverdostupM (2021) Gender identity, coworking spouses, and relative income within households. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics13(4): 258–284.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
