Doing Double Time: Women,Incarceration and Employment Discrimination

Abstract

People who have served prison time experience a higher unemployment rate than other social groups. Australian law stipulates individuals must not face employment discrimination on the basis of criminal record if unrelated to the job’s inherent requirements, but discrimination remains significant. Female ex-offenders are particularly vulnerable to stigma and discrimination. Nicki’s (pseudonym) account airs injustices facing women seeking rehabilitation post-incarceration. Her experiences highlight structural barriers female ex-offenders face when seeking employment and marginalisation hindering social acceptance.

Keywords

discrimination employment incarceration stigma women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albright

Denq

(1996) Employer attitudes toward hiring ex-offenders. The Prison Journal 76: 2118–2137.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2019) Corrective Services, Australia, June, Quarter 2019 (cat. no. 4512.0). Canberra, ACT: ABS.

Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) (2019) Annual Report, 2018–19. Canberra City, ACT: Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission.

Australian Government Productivity Commission Report (2017) Available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2017/justice (accessed 19 October 2020).

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2019) The Health of Australia’s Prisoners 2018 (cat. no. PHE 246). Canberra, ACT: AIHW.

Avery

Hernandez

(2018) Ban the Box: US Cities, Counties and States Adopt Fair Hiring Policies to Reduce Barriers to Employment of People with Conviction Records. National Employment Law Project. Available at: nelp.org/content/uploads/Ban-the-Box-Fair-Chance-State-and-Local-Guide.pdf (accessed 20 January 2020).

Baldry

Maplestone

(2003) Barriers to social and economic inclusion for those leaving prison. Human Rights Defender 12(1): 24–26.

Baldry

Bright

Cale

, et al. (2018) A Future beyond the Wall: Improving Post-Release Employment Outcomes for People Leaving Prison (Final report, UNSW). Available at: http://doi.org/10.26190/5b4fd2de5cfb4 (accessed 10 January 2020).

Blanchette

Taylor

(2010) A review of treatment initiatives for female sexual offenders. In: Gannon

Cortoni

(eds) Female Sexual Offenders: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 119–141.

10.

Blumstein

Nakamura

(2009) Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology 47(2): 327–359.

11.

Braithwaite

(1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Burkart

(1973) Women in Prison. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

13.

Chenou

Radu

(2015) Beyond turf wars in Internet governance: The relationship between Internet organizations and IGOs. In: Fontaine-Skronski

Rioux

(eds) Global Governance Facing Structural Changes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 37–58.

14.

Child Family Community Australia (CFCA) (2017) Age of consent laws CFCA resource sheet, July 2017. Available at: https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/age-consent-laws (accessed 1 October 2020).

15.

Cortoni

Gannon

(2013) What works with female sexual offenders. In: Craig

Dixon

Gannon

(eds) What Works in Offender Rehabilitation: An Evidence-based Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 271–284.

16.

Court Data Australia (2020) Court Data Australia. Available at: https://www.courtdata.com.au/ (accessed 30 November 2020).

17.

CrimTrac (2016) Annual Report, 2015–16. Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. Available at: https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/corporate-documents/annual-reports/crimtrac-annual-report-2015-16 (accessed 30 November 2020).

18.

Croucher

(2018) Righting the relic: towards effective protections for criminal record discrimination. Law Society of NSW Journal 48: 73–75.

19.

Croucher

(2019) ‘Seeking equal dignity without discrimination’ – The Australian Human Rights Commission and the handling of complaints. Australian Labour Journal 93(7): 571–584.

20.

Dodge

Pogrebin

(2001) Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal 81(1): 42–54.

21.

Easteal

(2001) Women in Australian prisons: the cycle of abuse and dysfunctional environments. The Prison Journal 81(1): 87–112.

22.

Erikson

(1953) Growth and crises of the healthy personality. II. Psyche 7(2): 112–139.

23.

Erikson

(1977) Life History and the Historical Moment: Diverse Presentations. New York: WW Norton & Company.

24.

Farrall

(2013) Social capital and offender reintegration: making probation desistance focused. In: Maruna

Immarigeon

(eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton, Devon; Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, 57–82.

25.

Fitzgerald

Cherney

Heybroek

(2016) Recidivism among Prisoners: Who Comes Back? Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 530. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology.

26.

Flake

(2015) When any sentence is a life sentence: employment discrimination against people with criminal histories. Washington University Law Review 93(1): 45–102.

27.

Graffam

Shinkfield

Lavelle

(2014) Recidivism among participants of an employment assistance program for prisoners and offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 58: 348–363.

28.

Herrschaft

Veysey

Tubman-Carbone

, et al. (2009) Gender differences in the transformation narrative: implications for revised reentry strategies for female offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 48(6): 463–482.

29.

Heydon

Naylor

(2017) Criminal record checking and employment: the importance of policy and proximity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 51(3): 372–394.

30.

Heydon

Naylor

Paterson

, et al. (2011) Lawyers on the record: criminal records, employment decisions and lawyers’ counsel. Adelaide Law Review 32(2): 205–225.

31.

McFarlane

(2017) Pathways from care to custody: the criminalisation of kids in care. In: NSW Juvenile Justice Research Seminar, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 17 November 2017.

32.

Metcalf

Anderson

Rolfe

(2001) Barriers to Employment of Offenders and People with Criminal Histories (Research report no. 155). Available at: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep155.html (accessed 2 November 2019).

33.

Minow

(1998) Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

34.

Naylor

(2012) Living down the past: why a criminal record should not be a barrier to successful employment. Employment Law Bulletin 18(8): 115–119.

35.

NYC Human Rights (2015) Fair Chance Act: Legal Enforcement Guidance. Available at: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/cchr/law/fair-chance-act.page (accessed 22 January 2020).

36.

O’Brien

(2001) ‘Just like baking a cake’: women describe the necessary ingredients for successful re-entry after incarceration. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services 82(3): 287–295.

37.

Office of the Correctional Investigator (2015) Federally sentenced women. Annual Report of the Office of the Correctional Investigator 2014–2015. Available at: https://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/rpt/annrpt/annrpt20142015-eng.aspx#s10 (accessed 2 October 2020).

38.

Ooi

(2018) Recent Trends in the NSW Female Prison Population (issue paper no. 130). Available at: https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/BB/2018-Report-Recent-Trends-in-the-NSW-Female-Prison-Population-BB130.pdf (accessed 10 January 2020).

39.

Pijoan

(2014) Legal protections against criminal background checks in Europe. Punishment & Society 16(1): 50–73.

40.

Prison Reform Trust (2012) Women in Prison. Available at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/WomenbriefingAug12small.pdf (accessed 2 October 2020).

41.

Prison Reform Trust (2017) Why Focus on Reducing Women’s Imprisonment in Scotland? Available at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Women/why%20women_Scotland_final.pdf (accessed 2 October 2020).

42.

Rafter

(1985) Gender, prisons, and prison history. Social Science History 9(3): 233–247.

43.

Rodriguez

Emsellem

(2011) 65 million need not apply: the case for reforming criminal background checks for employment. National Employment Law Project. Available at: https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/65_Million_Need_Not_Apply.pdf (accessed 18 November 2019).

44.

Skardhamar

Telle

(2012) Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 28(4): 629–649.

45.

Stacey

(2017) Rehabilitation in the internet age: the Google-effect and the disclosure of criminal records. Probation Journal 64(3): 269–275.

46.

Stathopoulos

Quadara

(2014) Women as offenders, women as victims: the role of corrections in supporting women with histories of sexual abuse. Available at: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/women-offenders-women-victims (accessed 15 October 2020).

47.

Straussner

SLA

Attia

(2002) Women’s addiction and treatment through a historical lens. In: Straussner

SLA

Brown

(eds) The Handbook of Addiction Treatment for Women. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 3–25.

48.

Uggen

Manza

Behrens

(2004) ‘Less than the average citizen’: stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. In: Maruna

Immarigeon

(eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton, Devon; Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, 261–293.

49.

van den Broek

Black

Psillakis

(2020) Female Ex-Offenders, Discrimination and Work: The Role of the Success Works Initiative. Sydney, NSW: The University of Sydney.

50.

Webster

Hedderman

Turnball

, et al. (2001) Building Bridges to Employment for Prisoners (Home Office Research Study no. 226). London: Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.