This study examines whether working long hours alters the motherhood earnings penalty in the context of the United States. The author uses data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1979–2014) to model the annual earnings penalty mothers incur per child in the United States. The results support that working long hours (50+ hours per week) reduces the negative effect of motherhood on earnings for white women. Once we control for human capital and labour supply, however, there is no difference in the effect of children on earnings between full-time workers and overworkers. For Black full-time workers and overworkers, having an additional child has little effect on earnings. The findings suggest that although overwork appears to attenuate the earnings penalty for white mothers, white mothers who work long hours exhibit a smaller penalty because they already have high levels of human capital and supply a great amount of labour.
AughinbaughAPierretCRRothsteinDS (2017) Attrition and Its Implications in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
3.
BeckerG (1985) Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics3(1): 33–58.
4.
BenardSCorrellSJ (2010) Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society24(5): 616–646.
5.
BergPBoschGCharestJ (2014) Working-time configurations: a framework for analyzing diversity across countries. Industrial and Labor Relations Review67(3): 805–837.
6.
BianchiSMMilkieMA (2010) Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family72(3): 705–725.
7.
BianchiSMSayerLCMilkieMA, et al. (2012) Housework: who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter?Social Forces91(1): 55–63.
8.
Blair-LoyM (2003) Competing Devotions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Blair-LoyM (2009) Work without end? Scheduling flexibility and work-to-family conflict among stockbrokers. Work and Occupations36(4): 279–317.
10.
BuchmanCMcDanielA (2016) Motherhood and the wages of women in professional occupations. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4): 128–150.
11.
BudigMJEnglandP (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review66(2): 204–225.
12.
BudigMJHodgesMJ (2010) Differences in disadvantage: variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review75(5): 705–728.
13.
BudigMJMisraJBoeckmannI (2016) Work–family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and Occupations43(2): 119–177.
14.
BurgerAS (2018) Extreme work hours in Western Europe and North America: diverging trends since the 1970s. Socio-Economic Review18(4): 1–23.
15.
CasperLMBianchiSM (2002) Change and Continuity in the American Family. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
CechEABlair-LoyM (2019) The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(10): 4182–4187.
17.
ChaY (2013) Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & Society27(2): 158–184.
18.
ChaYWeedenK (2014) Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. American Sociological Review79(3): 457–484.
19.
CloggCCPetkovaEHaritouA (1995) Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology100(5): 1261–1293.
20.
CookeLP (2014) Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review30(3): 360–372.
21.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1297–1339.
22.
CraigLMullanK (2010) Parenthood, gender and work–family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family72(5): 1344–1361.
23.
CraigLMullanK (2011) How mothers and fathers share childcare: a cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review76(6): 834–861.
24.
DowDM (2016) Integrated motherhood: beyond hegemonic ideologies of motherhood. Journal of Marriage and Family78(1): 180–196.
25.
EnglandPBearakJBudigMJ, et al. (2016) Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty?American Sociological Review81(6): 1161–1189.
26.
FlorianSM (2018) Motherhood and employment among whites, Hispanics, and blacks: a life course approach. Journal of Marriage and Family80(1): 134–149.
27.
FullerSHirshCE (2018) ‘Family-friendly’ jobs and motherhood pay penalties: the impact of flexible work arrangements across the educational spectrum. Work and Occupations46(1): 1–42.
28.
GanglMZiefleA (2009) Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s career: an empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography46(2): 341–369.
29.
GerstelNClawsonD (2015) Class advantage and the gender divide: flexibility on the job and at home. American Journal of Sociology120(2): 395–431.
30.
GiesselmannMSchmidt-CatranA (2018) Interactions in Fixed Effects Regression Models. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research, DIW Berlin.
31.
GlauberR (2007) Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Marriage and Family69(4): 951–961.
32.
GlauberR (2008) Race and gender in families and at work. Gender & Society22(1): 8–30.
33.
GornickJCMeyersM (2003) Families That Work. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
34.
HookJL (2017) Women’s housework: new tests of time and money. Journal of Marriage and Family79(1): 179–198.
35.
KillewaldA (2011) Opting out and buying out: wives’ earnings and housework time. Journal of Marriage and Family73(2): 459–471.
36.
KillewaldAZhuoX (2019) U.S. mothers’ long-term employment patterns. Demography56(1): 285–320.
37.
KmecJA (2011) Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Social Science Research40(2): 444–459.
38.
KornrichSRobertsA (2018) Household income, women’s earnings, and spending on household services, 1980–2010. Journal of Marriage and Family80(1): 150–165.
39.
LindsayJMaherJ (2014) The intersections of work time and care time: nurses’ and builders’ family time economies. Work, Employment and Society28(2): 189–205.
40.
MaumeDJHoustonP (2001) Job segregation and gender differences in work–family spillover among white-collar workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues22(2): 171–189.
41.
MeyerPBOsborneAM (2005) Proposed category system for 1960–2000 Census occupations. BLS Working Papers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
42.
MoenPLamJAmmonsS, et al. (2013) Time work by overworked professionals: strategies in response to the stress of higher status. Work and Occupations40(2): 79–114.
43.
MullanKWajcmanJ (2019) Have mobile devices changed working patterns in the 21st century? A time-diary analysis of work extension in the UK. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 3–20.
44.
NeelyMT (2020) The portfolio ideal worker: insecurity and inequality in the new economy. Qualitative Sociology43(2): 271–296.
45.
NiemistöCHearnJKehnC, et al. (2021) Motherhood 2.0: slow progress for career women and motherhood within the ‘Finnish Dream’. Work, Employment and Society35(4): 696–715.
46.
PasBPetersPEisingaR, et al. (2011) Explaining career motivation among female doctors in the Netherlands: the effects of children, views on motherhood and work–home cultures. Work, Employment and Society25(3): 487–505.
47.
PercheskiC (2008) Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005. American Sociological Review73(3): 497–517.
48.
ReynoldsJ (2003) You can’t always get the hours you want: work hours in the U.S. Social Forces81(4): 1171–1199.
49.
RoetersALippeTVan Der KluwerE (2010) Work characteristics and parent–child relationship quality: the mediating role of temporal involvement. Journal of Marriage and Family72(5): 1317–1328.
50.
SharoneO (2004) Engineering overwork: bell-curve management at a high-tech firm. In: EpsteinCFKallebergAL (eds) Fighting for Time. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 191–218.
51.
StierHLewin-EpsteinN (2003) Time to work: a comparative analysis of preferences for working hours. Work and Occupations30(3): 302–326.
52.
StierHLewin-EpsteinNBraunM (2012) Work–family conflict in comparative perspective: the role of social policies. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility30(3): 265–279.
53.
StoneP (2007) Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
54.
SturgesJ (2013) A matter of time: young professionals’ experiences of long work hours. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 343–359.
55.
TurcoCJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism: evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. American Sociological Review75(6): 894–913.
56.
Van WinkleZFasangAE (2020) Parenthood wage gaps across the life course: a comparison by gender and race. Journal of Marriage and Family82(5): 1515–1533.
57.
VoydanoffP (2004) Demands and resources on the effects of work conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family66(1): 398–412.
58.
WeedenKAChaYBuccacM (2016) Long work hours, part-time work, and trends in the gender gap in pay, the motherhood wage penalty, and the fatherhood wage premium. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4): 71–102.
59.
WrightT (2014) Gender, sexuality and male-dominated work: the intersection of long-hours working and domestic life. Work, Employment and Society28(6): 985–1002.
60.
YuWKuoJC (2017) The motherhood wage penalty by work conditions: how do occupational characteristics hinder or empower mothers?American Sociological Review82(4): 744–769.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
