To what extent and in what ways do welfare state policies and cultural values affect the employment patterns of mid-life women with care responsibilities toward a frail parent? The study draws on Eurobarometer micro-data integrated with country-level information to respond to this question. Performing a multilevel analysis across 21 European countries, it considers macro factors that influence the decisions of mid-life women to give up or reduce paid work in order to care for a frail elderly parent. The results show that, while the overall level of expenditure on long-term care is not influential, settings characterized by limited formal care services, and strong norms with regard to intergenerational obligations, have a negative impact on women’s attachment to the labour market. Policies and cultural factors also influence the extent to which women are polarized: in more defamilialized countries, regardless of their level of education, female carers rarely reduce their level of employment.
AnttonenASipiläJ (1996) European social care services: is it possible to identify models?Journal of European Social Policy6(2): 87–100.
2.
AnttonenABaldockJSipiläJ (2003) The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
3.
BoeckmannIMisraJBudigM (2015) Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces93(4): 1301–33.
4.
BolinKBjornLLundborgP (2008) Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. Journal of Health Economics27(3): 718–38.
5.
CarmichaelFConnellGHulmeCSheppardS (2005) Who cares and at what cost? The incidence and the opportunity costs of informal care. Working Paper 209/05. Salford: Salford University, Management & Management Science Research Institute.
6.
CortiLLaurieHDexS (1994) Caring and Employment. Colchester: University of Essex.
7.
CrespoL (2006) Caring for Parents and Employment Status of European Mid-Life Women. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI), Working Paper No. 0615.
8.
CrouchC (2015) Governing Social Risks in Post Crisis Europe. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
9.
DalyMLewisJ (1998) Introduction: conceptualising social care in the context of welfare state restructuring. In: LewisJ (ed.) Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, 86–103.
10.
Da RoitBLe BihanB (2010) Similar and yet so different: cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. Milbank Quarterly88(3): 286–309.
11.
Da RoitBNaldiniM (2010) Should I stay or should I go? Combining work and care for an older parent in Italy. South European Society and Politics15(4): 531–51.
12.
Da RoitBSabatinelliS (2013) Nothing on the move or just going private? Understanding the freeze on child- and eldercare policies and the development of care markets in Italy. Social Politics20(3): 430–53.
13.
ElderG (1995) The life course paradigm: social change and individual development. In: MoenPElderGLusherK (eds) Examining Lives in Context: Perspective on the Ecology of Human Development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 101–39.
14.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New York: Polity Press.
15.
Eurobarometer (2007) Health and long term care in the European Union (Special Eurobarometer no. 283). Brussels: European Commission.
16.
European Commission (2012) The 2012 Aging Report. Brussels: European Commission.
17.
FinchJMasonJ (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.
18.
GashV (2008) Preference or constraint? Part-time workers’ transitions in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom. Work, Employment and Society22(4): 655–74.
19.
GeistC (2005) The welfare state and the home: regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review21(1): 23–41.
20.
HeitmuellerA (2007) The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England. Journal of Health Economics26(3): 536–59.
21.
HeitmuellerAMichaudP (2006) Informal care and employment in England: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. IZA Discussion Paper2010. Bonn: IZA.
22.
KnijnTMartinCLe BihanB (2013) Workers under pressure and social care arrangements: a research framework. In: Le BihanBMartinCKnijnT (eds) Work and Care under Pressure: Care Arrangements across Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 7–31.
23.
KotsadamA (2011) Does informal eldercare impede women’s employment? The case of European Welfare States. Feminist Economics17(2): 121–44.
24.
KrogerTYeandleS (2013) Reconciling work and care: an international analysis. In: KrogerTYeandleS (eds) Combining Paid Work and Family Care: Policies and Experiences in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, 3–21.
25.
LechnerVNealM (eds) (1999) Working and Caring for the Elderly: International Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
26.
MillarJWarmanA (1996) Family Obligations in Europe. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
27.
MisraJBudigMJMollerS (2007) Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice9(2): 135–55.
28.
MoenPRobisonJFieldsV (1994) Women’s work and caregiving roles: a life-course approach. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences49(4): 176–86.
29.
MorganKJZippelK (2003) Paid to care: the origins and effects of care leave policies in Western Europe. Social Politics10(1): 49–85.
30.
NaldiniM (2003) The Family in Mediterranean Welfare States. London, New York: Frank Cass.
31.
O’ReillyJ (2006) Framing comparisons: gendering perspectives on cross-national comparative research on work and welfare. Work, Employment and Society20(4): 731–50.
32.
PavalkoEKArtisJE (1997) Women’s caregiving and paid work: causal relationships in late midlife. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences52(4): 170–9.
33.
Pfau-EffingerB (2005) Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies7(3): 321–41.
34.
Pfau-EffingerB (2010) Cultural and institutional contexts. In: TreasJDrobnicS (eds) Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women, and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 125–46.
35.
SaracenoC (2010) Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy20(1): 32–44.
36.
SaracenoCKeckW (2010) Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes. European Societies12(5): 675–96.
37.
SarasaS (2008) Do welfare benefits affect women’s choices of adult caregiving. European Sociological Review24(1): 37–51.
38.
SarasaSBillingsleyS (2008) Personal and household caregiving from adult children to parents and social stratification. In: SaracenoC (ed.) Families, Ageing and Social Policy: Intergenerational Solidarity in European Welfare States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 123–46.
39.
SoleraCBettioF (2013) Women’s continuous careers in Italy: the education and public sector divide. Population Review52(1): 129–48.
40.
SpiessCKSchneiderU (2003) Interactions between care-giving and paid work hours among European midlife women, 1994 to 1996. Ageing and Society23(1): 41–68.
41.
SteiberNHaasB (2012) State of the art. Advances in explaining women’s employment patterns. Socio-Economic Review10(2): 343–67.
42.
StierHLewin-EpsteinN (2001) Welfare regimes, family-supportive policies, and women’s employment along the life-course. American Journal of Sociology106(6): 1731–60.
43.
SzinovaczMDaveyA (eds) (2008) Caregiving Contexts, Cultural, Familial and Societal Implications. New York: Springer.
44.
UngersonCYeandleS (2007) Conclusion: dilemmas, contradiction and changes. In: UngersonCYeandleS (eds) Cash for Care in Developed Welfare State. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 187–206.
45.
Van der LippeTde RuijterJde RuijterERaubW (2011) Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: a detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies, and culture. European Sociological Review27(2): 164–79.
46.
VlasbomJShippersJ (2006) Changing dynamics in female employment around childbirth: evidence from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. Work, Employment and Society20(2): 329–47.
