Work interruptions and young women’s career prospects in Germany,Sweden and the US

Abstract

This article assesses the impact of discontinuous work histories on young women’s occupational mobility in Germany, Sweden and the US. Women with continuous work histories are compared with those with gaps due to family leave, unemployment, or other reasons. The German Life History Study, the Swedish Level of Living Survey and the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth are used to estimate Cox regression models of the transition rate to downward or upward occupational mobility. The results indicate that US women face increased downward mobility with increasing duration of both family leave and unemployment. German women with unemployment experience are also more likely to encounter downward mobility, but no such relationship is found for family leave. In Sweden, family leave experience reduces the chances of upward mobility. Results question the human capital approach, according to which skills should deteriorate at the same rate independent of the reason for the leave.

Keywords

employment interruption Germany human capital theory occupational mobility signalling theory social policy Sweden US

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abendroth

Maas

Van der Lippe

(2013) Human capital and the gender gap in authority in European countries. European Sociological Review 29(2): 261–73.

Aisenbrey

Evertsson

Grunow

(2009) Is there a career penalty for mothers’ time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States. Social Forces 88(2): 573–605.

Albrecht

Edin

Sundström

Vroman

(1999) Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: a reexamination using Swedish data. Journal of Human Resources 34(2): 294–311.

Becker

(1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Berggren

(2004) Flexibel föräldrapenning – hur mammor och pappor använder föräldraförsäkringen och hur länge de är föräldralediga. RFV Analyserar 2004: 14. Stockholm: Riksförsäkringsverket.

Breen

(2010) Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Social Forces 89(2): 365–88.

Brückner

Mayer

(1995) Lebensverläufe und gesellschaftlicher Wandel: Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1954–1956 und 1959–61. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.

Cleves

Gould

Gutierrez

Marchenko

(2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata, 3rd Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Daly

(2011) What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics 18(1): 1–23.

10.

DiPrete

Eirich

(2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 271–97.

11.

DiPrete

de Graaf

Luijkx

Tåhlin

Blossfeld

(1997) Collectivist versus individualist mobility regimes? Structural change and job mobility in four countries. American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 318–58.

12.

Ebbinghaus

Eichhorst

(2006) Employment regulation and labor market policy in Germany, 1991–2005. IZA Discussion paper no. 2505. Available (consulted 17 July 2014) at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp2505.pdf

13.

England

(ed.) (1993) Theory on Gender: Feminism on Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

14.

Esping-Andersen

(1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Estévez-Abe

(2005) Gender bias in skills and social policies: the varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation. Social Politics 12(2): 180–215.

16.

Estévez-Abe

(2006) Gendering the varieties of capitalism: a study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies. World Politics 59(1): 142–75.

17.

Estévez-Abe

(2009) Gender, inequality, and capitalism: the ‘varieties of capitalism’ and women. Social Politics 16(2): 182–91.

18.

Gangl

(2006) Scar effects of unemployment: an assessment of institutional complementarities. American Sociological Review 71(6): 986–1013.

19.

Gibbons

Katz

(1991) Layoffs and lemons. Journal of Labor Economics 9(4): 351–80.

20.

Gornick

Meyers

(2003) Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

21.

Grunow

Aisenbrey

Evertsson

(2011) Familienpolitik, Bildung und Berufskarrieren von Müttern in Deutschland, USA und Schweden. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63(3): 395–430.

22.

Hakim

(2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Hall

Soskice

(eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Hofmeister

Blossfeld

Mills

(2006) Globalization, uncertainty and women’s mid-career life courses: a theoretical framework. In: Blossfeld

Hofmeister

(eds) Globalization, Uncertainty, and Women’s Careers: An International Comparison. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 3–31.

25.

Ketsche

Branscomb

(2003) The long-term costs of career interruptions. Journal of Health Care Management 48(1): 30–44.

26.

Klerman

Daley

Pozniak

(2013) Family and Medical Leave in 2012: Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. Available (consulted 22 June 2015) at: http://www.dol.gov/asp/evaluation/fmla/FMLA-2012-Technical-Report.pdf

27.

Korpi

Mertens

(2003) Training systems and labor mobility: a comparison between Germany and Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 105(4): 597–617.

28.

Korpi

Stenberg

SÅ

(2001) Massarbetslöshetens Sverige – arbetslöshetens karaktär och effekter på individers levnadsförhållanden. In: Fritzell

Gähler

Lundberg

(eds) Välfärd och arbete i arbetslöshetens årtionde. Kommittén Välfärdsbokslut/SOU 2001:53. Stockholm: Fritzes, 31–77.

29.

Kunze

(2002) The Timing of Careers and Human Capital Depreciation. IZA Discussion paper No. 509. Bonn: The Institute for Study of Labor (IZA). Available (consulted 17 September 2015) at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=319961

30.

Lister

(1994) ‘She has other duties’: women, citizenship and social security. In: Baldwin

Falkingham

(eds) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. New York: Harvest Wheatsheaf, 31–44.

31.

Mandel

(2009) Configurations of gender inequality: the consequences of ideology and public policy. British Journal of Sociology 60(4): 693–719.

32.

Mandel

Semyonov

(2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review 70(6): 949–67.

33.

Mandel

Shalev

(2009) Gender, class and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics 16(2): 161–81.

34.

Martin

Thelen

(2007) The state and coordinated capitalism: contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics 60(1): 1–36.

35.

Mayer

Grunow

Nitsche

(2010) Mythos Flexibilisierung? Wie instabil sind Berufsbiografien wirklich und als wie instabil werden sie wahrgenommen? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 62(3): 369–402.

36.

Miller

(2011) The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics 24(3): 1071–100.

37.

Mincer

Polachek

(1974) Family investments in human capital: earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy 82: S76–S108.

38.

Nordenmark

Strand

Layte

(2011) The impact of unemployment benefit system on the mental well-being of the unemployed in Sweden Ireland and Great Britain. European Societies 8(1): 83–110.

39.

OECD (1999) Employment Outlook. OECD Publishing. Available (consulted 17 September 2015) at: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-1999_empl_outlook-1999-en#page1

40.

OECD (2011) OECD Indicators of Employment Protection. OECD Publishing. Available (consulted 17 July 2014) at: www.oecd.org/employment/protection

41.

OECD (2013) Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. Available (consulted 17 July 2014) at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en

42.

OECD (2015) OECD Family Database. Paris: OECD. Available (consulted 17 July 2014) at: www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm

43.

OECD Factbook (2013) Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD Publishing. Available (consulted 17 July 2014) at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-factbook-2013_factbook-2013-en

44.

Orloff

(2009) Should feminists aim for gender symmetry? Why the dual-earner/dual-carer model may not be every feminist’s utopia. In: Gornick

Meyers

(eds) Gender Equality, Transforming Family Divisions of Labor. New York: Verso, 129–60.

45.

Österholm

(2010) Unemployment and labour-force participation in Sweden. Economic Letters 106(3): 205–8.

46.

Ostner

(2010) Farewell to the family as we know it: family policy change in Germany. German Policy Studies 6(1): 211–44.

47.

Ruhm

(1991) Are workers permanently scarred by job displacement? American Economic Review 81(1): 319–24.

48.

Saraceno

Keck

(2010) Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies 12(5): 675–96.

49.

Spence

(1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–74.

50.

Treiman

(1977) Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.

51.

Walby

(2004) The European Union and gender equality: emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics 11(1): 4–29.

52.

Waldfogel

(2001) International policies toward parental leave and child care. Future of Children 11(1): 98–111.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB