This article assesses the impact of discontinuous work histories on young women’s occupational mobility in Germany, Sweden and the US. Women with continuous work histories are compared with those with gaps due to family leave, unemployment, or other reasons. The German Life History Study, the Swedish Level of Living Survey and the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth are used to estimate Cox regression models of the transition rate to downward or upward occupational mobility. The results indicate that US women face increased downward mobility with increasing duration of both family leave and unemployment. German women with unemployment experience are also more likely to encounter downward mobility, but no such relationship is found for family leave. In Sweden, family leave experience reduces the chances of upward mobility. Results question the human capital approach, according to which skills should deteriorate at the same rate independent of the reason for the leave.
AbendrothAKMaasIVan der LippeT (2013) Human capital and the gender gap in authority in European countries. European Sociological Review29(2): 261–73.
2.
AisenbreySEvertssonMGrunowD (2009) Is there a career penalty for mothers’ time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States. Social Forces88(2): 573–605.
3.
AlbrechtJWEdinPASundströmMVromanSB (1999) Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: a reexamination using Swedish data. Journal of Human Resources34(2): 294–311.
4.
BeckerGS (1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BerggrenS (2004) Flexibel föräldrapenning – hur mammor och pappor använder föräldraförsäkringen och hur länge de är föräldralediga. RFV Analyserar2004: 14. Stockholm: Riksförsäkringsverket.
6.
BreenR (2010) Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Social Forces89(2): 365–88.
7.
BrücknerHMayerKU (1995) Lebensverläufe und gesellschaftlicher Wandel: Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1954–1956 und 1959–61. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
8.
ClevesMAGouldWWGutierrezRGMarchenkoYV (2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata, 3rd Edition.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
9.
DalyM (2011) What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics18(1): 1–23.
10.
DiPreteTAEirichGM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology32: 271–97.
11.
DiPreteTAde GraafNDLuijkxRTåhlinMBlossfeldHP (1997) Collectivist versus individualist mobility regimes? Structural change and job mobility in four countries. American Journal of Sociology103(2): 318–58.
12.
EbbinghausBEichhorstW (2006) Employment regulation and labor market policy in Germany, 1991–2005. IZA Discussion paper no. 2505. Available (consulted 17July2014) at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp2505.pdf
13.
EnglandP (ed.) (1993) Theory on Gender: Feminism on Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
14.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Estévez-AbeM (2005) Gender bias in skills and social policies: the varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation. Social Politics12(2): 180–215.
16.
Estévez-AbeM (2006) Gendering the varieties of capitalism: a study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies. World Politics59(1): 142–75.
17.
Estévez-AbeM (2009) Gender, inequality, and capitalism: the ‘varieties of capitalism’ and women. Social Politics16(2): 182–91.
18.
GanglM (2006) Scar effects of unemployment: an assessment of institutional complementarities. American Sociological Review71(6): 986–1013.
19.
GibbonsRKatzLF (1991) Layoffs and lemons. Journal of Labor Economics9(4): 351–80.
20.
GornickJCMeyersMK (2003) Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
GrunowDAisenbreySEvertssonM (2011) Familienpolitik, Bildung und Berufskarrieren von Müttern in Deutschland, USA und Schweden. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie63(3): 395–430.
22.
HakimC (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HallPASoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HofmeisterHBlossfeldHPMillsM (2006) Globalization, uncertainty and women’s mid-career life courses: a theoretical framework. In: BlossfeldHPHofmeisterH (eds) Globalization, Uncertainty, and Women’s Careers: An International Comparison. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 3–31.
25.
KetschePGBranscombL (2003) The long-term costs of career interruptions. Journal of Health Care Management48(1): 30–44.
KorpiTMertensA (2003) Training systems and labor mobility: a comparison between Germany and Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics105(4): 597–617.
28.
KorpiTStenbergSÅ (2001) Massarbetslöshetens Sverige – arbetslöshetens karaktär och effekter på individers levnadsförhållanden. In: FritzellJGählerMLundbergO (eds) Välfärd och arbete i arbetslöshetens årtionde. Kommittén Välfärdsbokslut/SOU 2001:53. Stockholm: Fritzes, 31–77.
29.
KunzeA (2002) The Timing of Careers and Human Capital Depreciation. IZA Discussion paper No. 509. Bonn: The Institute for Study of Labor (IZA). Available (consulted 17September2015) at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=319961
30.
ListerR (1994) ‘She has other duties’: women, citizenship and social security. In: BaldwinSFalkinghamJ (eds) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. New York: Harvest Wheatsheaf, 31–44.
31.
MandelH (2009) Configurations of gender inequality: the consequences of ideology and public policy. British Journal of Sociology60(4): 693–719.
32.
MandelHSemyonovM (2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review70(6): 949–67.
33.
MandelHShalevM (2009) Gender, class and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics16(2): 161–81.
34.
MartinCJThelenK (2007) The state and coordinated capitalism: contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics60(1): 1–36.
35.
MayerKUGrunowDNitscheN (2010) Mythos Flexibilisierung? Wie instabil sind Berufsbiografien wirklich und als wie instabil werden sie wahrgenommen?Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie62(3): 369–402.
36.
MillerAR (2011) The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics24(3): 1071–100.
37.
MincerJPolachekS (1974) Family investments in human capital: earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy82: S76–S108.
38.
NordenmarkMStrandMLayteR (2011) The impact of unemployment benefit system on the mental well-being of the unemployed in Sweden Ireland and Great Britain. European Societies8(1): 83–110.
OrloffAS (2009) Should feminists aim for gender symmetry? Why the dual-earner/dual-carer modelmaynot be every feminist’s utopia. In: GornickJMeyersM (eds) Gender Equality, Transforming Family Divisions of Labor. New York: Verso, 129–60.
45.
ÖsterholmP (2010) Unemployment and labour-force participation in Sweden. Economic Letters106(3): 205–8.
46.
OstnerI (2010) Farewell to the family as we know it: family policy change in Germany. German Policy Studies6(1): 211–44.
47.
RuhmCJ (1991) Are workers permanently scarred by job displacement?American Economic Review81(1): 319–24.
48.
SaracenoCKeckW (2010) Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?European Societies12(5): 675–96.
49.
SpenceM (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics87: 355–74.
50.
TreimanDJ (1977) Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
51.
WalbyS (2004) The European Union and gender equality: emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics11(1): 4–29.
52.
WaldfogelJ (2001) International policies toward parental leave and child care. Future of Children11(1): 98–111.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
