This article analyses how Czech mothers perceive the consequences for their careers of interruptions in their employment due to childcare and how their perceptions are affected by whether they had their children prior to or after the fall of the socialist regime. The analysis reveals that women’s perceptions of interruptions in employment due to childcare have changed over time and depend on the institutional and legal context; in particular, the fall of the socialist regime had a significant impact on the perceptions of mothers. The analysis indicates that women who had children after 1989 exhibit more negative perceptions of how engaging in childcare influenced their careers compared to mothers who interrupted their careers due to childcare before the fall of the state socialist regime.
BerridgeDPennRGanjaliM (2009) Changing attitudes to gender roles: a longitudinal analysis of ordinal response data from the British Household Panel study. International Sociology24(346): 346–67.
2.
CaldwellJCSchindlmayerT (2003) Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities. Population Studies57(3): 241–63.
3.
ČermákováM (1997) Postavení žen na trhu práce. Sociologický časopis33(3): 389–404.
4.
ChiplinBSloanePJ (1976) Personal characteristics and sex differentials in professional employment. The Economic Journal86(344): 729–45.
5.
CromptonRLyonetteC (2005) The new gender essentialism: domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. The British Journal of Sociology56(4): 601–20.
6.
CromptonRBrockmannMLyonetteC (2005) Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: a cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment and Society19(2): 213–33.
7.
Council of Europe (2005) Parental Leave in Council of Europe Member States. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
8.
DesaiSWaiteL (1991) Women’s Employment during Pregnancy and after the First Birth: Occupational Characteristics and Work Commitment. Rand Note N-33-53-NICHD. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
9.
European Commission (2008) Report on Equality between Women and Men – 2008. Brussels: DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Unit G1, European Commission.
10.
HaasBSteiberNHartelMWallaceC (2006) Household employment patterns in an enlarged European Union. Work, Employment and Society20(4): 751–71.
11.
HakimC (2002) Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labour market careers. Work and Occupations29(4): 428–59.
HardarsonO (2006) People outside the Labour Force: Declining Inactivity Rates. Statistics in Focus: Population and Social Conditions. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
15.
JacobsS (2002) Reliability and recall of unemployment events using retrospective data. Work, Employment and Society16(3): 537–48.
16.
KangasORostgaardT (2007) Preferences or care context? Predictors for working life opportunities in seven European countries. Journal of European Social Policy17(8): 240–56.
17.
KilkeyMBradshawJ (1996) Lone mothers, economic well-being and politics. In: SainsburyD (ed.) Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–84.
18.
KalmijnM (2003) Country differences in sex-role attitudes: cultural and economic explanations. In: ArtsW. (eds) The Cultural Diversity of European Unity. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
19.
KřížkováA (1999) The division of labour in Czech households in the 1990s. Czech Sociological Review7(2): 205–14.
20.
LangT (2008) Communist legacies, gender and the impact on job satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations14(327): 327–46.
21.
LuckD (2006) Cross-National Comparison of Gender Role Attitudes and their Impact on Women’s Life Courses. Globalife Working Paper 67, Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg, Bamberg.
22.
LuckDHofackerD (2003) Rejection and Acceptance of the Male Breadwinner Model: Which Preferences do Women Have under Which Circumstances?Globalife Working Paper 60, Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg, Bamberg: Globalife.
23.
ManningN (2004) Diversity and change in re-accession Central and Eastern Europe since 1989. Journal of European Social Policy14(3): 211–32.
24.
MathAMeillandC (2004) Family Related Leave and Industrial Relations. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, European Industrial Relations Observatory. Available (consulted 5 September 2008) at: http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/about/2004/study/tn0403101s.html
25.
OECD (2005) Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
26.
PascallGKwakA (2005) Gender Regimes in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Bristol: Policy Press.
27.
PascallGLewisJ (2004) Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy33(3): 373–94.
28.
PascallGManningN (2000) Gender and social policy: comparing welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Journal of European Social Policy10(3): 240–66.
PollertA (2003) Women, work and equal opportunities in post-Communist transition. Work, Employment and Society17(2): 331–57.
31.
RabušicL (2001) Kde ty všechny děti jsou? Porodnost v sociologické perspektivě. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
32.
RostgaardT (2004) Early Childhood Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Decade and Half of Transition. Early Childhood and Family Policy Series 8. Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research. Available (consulted 23 March 2009) at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001337/133733e.pdf
33.
RuhmCJ (1998) The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lesson from Europe. The Quarterly Journal of Economics113(1): 285–317.
34.
SaxonbergSSirovátkaT (2006) Failing family policy in post-communist Central Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis8(2): 185–202.
35.
SzelevaDPolakowskiMP (2008) Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy18(2): 115–31.
36.
VečerníkJ (2007) Work values and job attitudes in the Czech Republic between 1997 and 2005. Czech Sociological Review42(6): 1195–1219.
