Despite a wealth of research on working at home, few studies have examined the effects of working at home in relation to its regularity and fewer still have used time use studies to do so. Using data from the 2006 Australian Time Use Survey this article investigates the association between working at home, gender and time use, in relation to amount of time spent in paid work, unpaid work and recreational labour, as well as multi-tasking, fragmentation of time and scheduling flexibility. It examines time use patterns according to whether employees do no work at home or whether they work at home rarely, occasionally or regularly. Results show there is an association between working at home and time in paid and unpaid work and that this differs by the regularity of working at home and gender. Working at home does not create more time for recreational labour, although it may help women juggle work and family.
AmmonsSKMarkhamWT (2004) Working at home: experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociological Spectrum: Mid-South Sociological Association24(2): 191–238.
BaileyDEKurlandNB (2002) A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(4): 383–400.
4.
BainesSGelderU (2003) What is family friendly about the workplace in the home? The case of self-employed parents and their children. New Technology, Work and Employment18(3): 223–34.
5.
BaruchY (2000) Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment15(1): 34–49.
6.
BerkeDL (2003) Coming home again: the challenges and rewards of home-based self-employment. Journal of Family Issues24(4): 513–46.
7.
BianchiSMMilkieMA (2010) Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family72(3): 705–25.
8.
BittmanMWajcmanJ (2000) The rush hour: the character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces79(1): 165–89.
9.
BoulinJLallementMMessengerJMichonF (2006) Decent Working Time: New Trends, New Issues. Geneva: International Labour Office.
10.
CallisterPDixonS (2001) New Zealanders’ Working Time and Home Work Patterns: Evidence from the Time Use Survey, Occasional Papers 2001/5, Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand.
11.
CallisterPSingleySG (2004) A Double Burden or the Best of Both Worlds? A Research Note on Simultaneous Paid Work and Childcare in New Zealand, Callister and Associates Working Paper, Paekakariki, New Zealand.
12.
CraigLMullanK (2013) Parental leisure time: a gender comparison in five countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society20(3): 329–57.
13.
CraigLPowellA (2011) Non-standard work schedules, work-family balance and the gendered division of childcare. Work, Employment and Society25(2): 274–91.
14.
CraigLPowellACortisN (2012) Self-employment, work-family time and the gender division of labour. Work, Employment and Society26(5): 716–34.
15.
DemeroutiEDerksDTen BrummelhuisLBakkerAB (2014) New ways of working: impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. In: KorunkaCHoonakkerP (eds) The Impact of ICT on Quality Working Life. Dordrecht: Springer, 123–41.
16.
FelsteadAJewsonN (2000) In Work, at Home: Towards an Understanding of Homeworking. London: Routledge.
17.
FelsteadAJewsonNPhizackleaAWaltersS (2001) Working at home: statistical evidence for seven key hypotheses. Work, Employment and Society15(2): 215–31.
18.
FelsteadAJewsonNPhizackleaAWaltersS (2002) The option to work at home: another privilege for the favoured few?New Technology, Work and Employment17(3): 204–23.
19.
GamblesRLewisSRapoportR (2006) The Myth of Work-Life: The Challenge of Our Time for Men, Women and Societies. Chichester: John Wiley.
20.
GoldenL (2008) Limited access: disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues29(1): 86–109.
21.
GoldenTDVeigaJF (2005) The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management31(2): 301–18.
22.
HaddonLBryninM (2005) The character of telework and the characteristics of teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment20(1): 34–46.
23.
HalfordS (2006) Collapsing the boundaries? Fatherhood, organization and home-working. Gender, Work and Organization13(4): 383–402.
24.
HilbrechtMShawSMJohnsonLCAndreyJ (2008) ‘I’m home for the kids’: contradictory implications for work-life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work and Organization15(5): 454–76.
25.
HillEJFerrisMMartinsonV (2003) Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior63(2): 220–41.
26.
KelleyCGEKelleySMCEvansMDRKelleyJ (2008) Attitudes toward homebased employment for mothers of young children: Australian evidence. International Journal of Social Welfare19(1): 33–44.
27.
KurlandNBBaileyDE (1999) Telework: the advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics28(2): 53–67.
28.
MannSHoldsworthL (2003) The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment18(3): 196–211.
29.
MaruyamaTHopkinsonPGJamesPW (2009) A multivariate analysis of work-life balance outcomes from a large-scale telework programme. New Technology, Work and Employment24(1): 76–88.
30.
MattinglyMBianchiS (2003) Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: the U.S. experience. Social Forces81(3): 999–1030.
31.
MattinglyMSayerL (2006) Under pressure: gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. Journal of Marriage and the Family68(1): 205–21.
32.
MichelsonWLindenKW (1997) Home and telework in Sweden. Paper presented at the Gender and Teleworking Conference, National Resource Center for Women, Stockholm, Sweden.
33.
MorgansonVJMajorDAObornKLVeriveJMHeelanMP (2010) Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology25(6): 578–95.
34.
NättiJTammelinMAnttilaTOjalaS (2011) Work at home and time use in Finland. New Technology, Work and Employment26(1): 68–77.
35.
OfferSSchneiderB (2010) Multitasking among working families: a strategy for dealing with the time squeeze. In: ChristensenKSchneiderB (eds) Workplace Flexibility: Realigning 20th-Century Jobs for a 21st-Century Workforce. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 43–56.
36.
PetersPVan der LippeT (2007) The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 430–47.
37.
PocockBSkinnerNWilliamsP (2012) Time Bomb: Work, Rest and Play in Australia Today. Sydney, NSW, Australia: New South Publishing.
38.
RansomeP (2007) Conceptualizing boundaries between ‘life’ and ‘work’. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 374–86.
39.
RedmanTSnapeEAshurstC (2009) Location, location, location: does place of work really matter?British Journal of Management20(s1): s171–81.
40.
RubinsteinJSMeyerDSEvansJE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology27(4): 763–97.
41.
SayerL (2007) More work for mothers? Trends and gender differences in multitasking. In: Van der LippeTPetersP (eds) Competing Claims in Work and Family Life. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 41–55.
42.
SchiemanSYoungM (2015) Who engages in work-family multitasking? A study of Canadian and American workers. Social Indicators Research120(3): 741–67.
43.
SilverH (1993) Homework and domestic work. Sociological Forum8(2): 181–204.
44.
SonnentagS (2001) Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: a diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology6(3): 196–210.
45.
SullivanC (2003) What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking. New Technology, Work and Employment18(3): 158–65.
46.
SullivanCLewisS (2001) Home-based telework, gender and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work and Organization8(2): 123–45.
47.
SullivanCSmithsonJ (2007) Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 448–61.
48.
SullivanO (1997) Time waits for no (wo)man: an investigation of the gendered experience of domestic time. Sociology31(2): 221–39.
49.
SullivanOGershunyJ (2013) Domestic outsourcing and multitasking: how much do they really contribute?Social Science Research42(5): 1311–24.
50.
Ten BrummelhuisLVan der LippeT (2010) Effective work-life balance support for various household structures. Human Resource Management49(2): 173–93.
51.
Van den BroekDKeatingE (2011) Rights to a process for the masses or select privileges for the few? Telework policy and labour market inequality in Australia. Policy Studies32(1): 21–33.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
